July 29, 2020

1307: 3 Keys to Supply Path Optimization in Programmatic Advertising w/ Dan Greenberg

Apple Podcasts podcast player icon
Spotify podcast player icon
YouTube Channel podcast player icon
Google Podcasts podcast player icon
Castro podcast player icon
RSS Feed podcast player icon

In this episode we talk to Dan Greenberg, Founder & CEO at Sharethrough.


Are you getting every B2B Growth episode in your favorite podcast player?

If not, you can easily subscribe & search past episodes here.

You can also find us on Apple Podcasts or Spotify.

Transcript
WEBVTT 1 00:00:05.679 --> 00:00:08.910 Welcome back to be tob growth. I'm Logan liles with sweet fish media. 2 00:00:09.109 --> 00:00:12.830 I'm join to day by Dan Greenberg, founder and CEO edge share through. 3 00:00:12.869 --> 00:00:15.830 Dan, how's it going today? Good. Thanks for having me. Absolutely 4 00:00:15.910 --> 00:00:20.390 man. We're going to be talking about optimizing your supply path in about fifteen 5 00:00:20.429 --> 00:00:25.379 minutes. There are some very quick wins that you're regularly consulting customers on. 6 00:00:25.780 --> 00:00:28.780 For some context, tell us a little bit about the world that you guys 7 00:00:28.899 --> 00:00:32.859 live in. A share through, what you guys do for some context to 8 00:00:33.020 --> 00:00:36.689 the conversation today? Sure, thank you. Yeah, good to get the 9 00:00:36.729 --> 00:00:39.530 sense of where I'm coming from so you can see the the context that this 10 00:00:39.609 --> 00:00:45.609 advice is coming from. What share through is is a programmatic add exchange of 11 00:00:45.729 --> 00:00:49.289 a new type. So programma ad exchanges have existed for I don't know, 12 00:00:49.369 --> 00:00:53.880 fifteen years or so, with Google addets being the biggest one, and there's 13 00:00:53.920 --> 00:00:57.799 others like Rubicon and pumatic and index and a few others. If you're a 14 00:00:57.840 --> 00:01:00.320 marketer, I'm sure you're familiar with them, because that's where you spend your 15 00:01:00.320 --> 00:01:03.719 money on programmatic advertising on the web. What share through is is a new 16 00:01:03.799 --> 00:01:08.629 type of add exchange. Design specifically for human centric advertising. So human centric 17 00:01:08.629 --> 00:01:17.510 advertising meaning not like overlays and page takeovers and pop unders and popups and ads 18 00:01:17.549 --> 00:01:22.260 in the corners and the adds that everybody looks to block and delete and mute, 19 00:01:22.780 --> 00:01:25.859 but the types of ads that are integrated. So what share through does 20 00:01:25.900 --> 00:01:29.780 is, first and foremost native advertising, adds that fit into the page, 21 00:01:29.859 --> 00:01:32.859 that are integrated to the user experience, so as you're scrolling through, it 22 00:01:32.930 --> 00:01:37.489 feels like another piece of content in the mix of content, as well as 23 00:01:37.530 --> 00:01:41.769 video and traditional display banner ads to but done in a really respectful, human 24 00:01:41.890 --> 00:01:47.799 centric way. And our market positioning and our technology stack is really designed about, 25 00:01:48.920 --> 00:01:53.560 designed to auto enhance every single ad that runs through our pipes. So 26 00:01:53.680 --> 00:01:57.439 as a supply path ourselves, meaning a buyer, runs ads through our supply 27 00:01:57.560 --> 00:02:00.920 path to arrive at a publisher site like CNN or rolling stone or whatever, 28 00:02:00.709 --> 00:02:05.790 when share through is the path, we auto enhance the impression to render a 29 00:02:05.989 --> 00:02:08.550 more respectful, better looking, higher performing to add in any placement on any 30 00:02:08.590 --> 00:02:13.229 site. If I level it up. The reason we do this and care 31 00:02:13.469 --> 00:02:16.419 is because advertising has gotten to a spot where people just are really offended by 32 00:02:16.460 --> 00:02:22.219 it at the worst and maybe at best ignore it, except when it's on 33 00:02:22.300 --> 00:02:27.139 facebook or instagram or maybe Youtube skippable ads, where they actually feel like they're 34 00:02:27.139 --> 00:02:30.330 kind of integrated and they feel like maybe it's a product that you're interested in. 35 00:02:30.449 --> 00:02:34.169 And sometimes it's too targeted or it's too integrated, but overall, like 36 00:02:34.250 --> 00:02:37.569 give an ad, can Pindad can present itself in a way that's helpful. 37 00:02:38.090 --> 00:02:39.530 That is the future of advertising. And so what we do is try to 38 00:02:39.569 --> 00:02:43.729 bring that same sort of methodology to the rest of the web so that a 39 00:02:43.889 --> 00:02:47.400 marketer like a Coker Pepsi or a Nike or a full, good example, 40 00:02:47.919 --> 00:02:52.240 when apple runs ads, they're not trying to run pop ups and takeovers or 41 00:02:52.280 --> 00:02:54.400 trying to run things that are respectful and integrated and fits sort of the apple 42 00:02:54.960 --> 00:02:59.469 vibe. And so what share through does is act as a supply partner at 43 00:02:59.509 --> 00:03:04.710 exchange that helps marketers run ads across the web on open web content sites, 44 00:03:04.710 --> 00:03:07.750 again, like see an Rollin Stone Hurst and at etc. But done the 45 00:03:07.789 --> 00:03:13.460 way that's respectful, human centric and just high quality and, as a result, 46 00:03:13.819 --> 00:03:17.819 performant and often higher performance than just a standard supply path like Google addicts. 47 00:03:19.259 --> 00:03:22.900 Yeah, absolutely, and so I know that there are really three key 48 00:03:22.979 --> 00:03:27.569 tips that you wanted to share with listeners today about optimizing their supply path between 49 00:03:27.610 --> 00:03:30.610 them and the publishing sites where their ads are going to be displayed. You 50 00:03:30.689 --> 00:03:35.569 already alluded to the first one, and that is being human centric in your 51 00:03:35.569 --> 00:03:38.729 advertising. I love that you guys, as a platform, are focusing on 52 00:03:38.090 --> 00:03:40.840 that taking it a step further. You want to make sure that, as 53 00:03:40.960 --> 00:03:46.319 a brand, you are advertising with being human centric in mind from the get 54 00:03:46.360 --> 00:03:50.000 go, from the type of ads you're running, the copy, all of 55 00:03:50.080 --> 00:03:53.000 that sort of stuff. The antithesis to this is kind of what you've already 56 00:03:53.000 --> 00:03:57.949 been talking about, the new sites that you just can't even get to the 57 00:03:58.030 --> 00:04:01.469 content. It's like you're waiting through all the junk to try and see what 58 00:04:01.629 --> 00:04:04.990 you thought you were promised by clicking that link, you were going to get 59 00:04:05.030 --> 00:04:10.259 to see right and that just that's kind of the horrible end of the spectrum 60 00:04:10.379 --> 00:04:14.939 that I feel as as a user and consumer of content. Tell us a 61 00:04:14.979 --> 00:04:17.180 little bit about that. You mentioned the way that you guys approach it, 62 00:04:17.259 --> 00:04:21.740 being human centric as that supply path. Where are you advising brands where you 63 00:04:21.860 --> 00:04:26.569 see them messing up? What should what should they stop doing when it comes 64 00:04:26.649 --> 00:04:30.170 to being more human centric in the ads that they are developing to get to 65 00:04:30.250 --> 00:04:33.649 those folks. Cool. Well, you touched on something that's really cool to 66 00:04:33.769 --> 00:04:38.129 my heart and really cool to the really mission of the company, which is 67 00:04:38.209 --> 00:04:41.720 when you go to a site intending to read an article written by a journalist 68 00:04:41.759 --> 00:04:45.480 with so much thought and care and intellectual energy put into it, the fact 69 00:04:45.519 --> 00:04:47.839 they have to wade through garbage to arrive at that and sometimes even just go 70 00:04:48.000 --> 00:04:51.720 back and just give up and go back to facebook or go back to youtube 71 00:04:51.759 --> 00:05:00.230 or whatever, is undermining the whole open, accessible content based Internet in some 72 00:05:00.350 --> 00:05:03.990 ways, like undermining journalism. It's not their fault, it's not the fault 73 00:05:04.029 --> 00:05:06.579 of the publisher sites that they do this. They're trying to make money to 74 00:05:06.660 --> 00:05:12.899 survive and that's that is the current standard in a lot of cases. But 75 00:05:12.980 --> 00:05:15.060 there is a better way and there's a better way that's been established on twitter 76 00:05:15.139 --> 00:05:19.180 and facebook and pinterest and instagram and every close platform, and that better way 77 00:05:19.220 --> 00:05:25.129 or it integrated native style human centric content based ads, and so we're bringing 78 00:05:25.209 --> 00:05:28.850 that to these sites and really the mission of this company by it's kind of 79 00:05:28.850 --> 00:05:30.769 a mouthful, but I would say it's really to ensure the preservation of the 80 00:05:30.850 --> 00:05:35.600 open Internet with independent and accessible content that can be funded by quality advertising and 81 00:05:36.639 --> 00:05:40.720 and I really do believe that. So how that translates to a buyer? 82 00:05:41.399 --> 00:05:45.920 It's out. If you're taking a humid human centric approach to advertising, it's 83 00:05:46.000 --> 00:05:49.189 saying even asking yourself this, like, if I would never email this to 84 00:05:49.310 --> 00:05:54.389 a customer, don't put it in an add if I would never post this 85 00:05:54.509 --> 00:05:58.629 to my facebook page, don't put in an ad. Like if you're looking 86 00:05:58.709 --> 00:06:03.069 to prospect new customers or introduce new customers to your brand through advertising, you 87 00:06:03.189 --> 00:06:08.220 need to be as respectful to those people as you are to your existing customers. 88 00:06:08.699 --> 00:06:11.220 If you look at an add and you're like, I would never post 89 00:06:11.220 --> 00:06:13.899 out to my facebook page, what are you talking about? Why are you 90 00:06:13.939 --> 00:06:16.620 spending money advertising that ad on the Internet to try to persuade people to come 91 00:06:16.699 --> 00:06:20.810 join you? If you make a video add and you watch it for thirty 92 00:06:20.850 --> 00:06:25.290 seconds, you're like, I would never want to watch that. Why are 93 00:06:25.290 --> 00:06:28.689 you making other people watch it? So to me human centric is just sort 94 00:06:28.689 --> 00:06:32.079 of checking yourself and saying like look, this is not cocacola doing advertising, 95 00:06:33.040 --> 00:06:40.759 this is a human on the internet seeing a piece of content. If you 96 00:06:40.839 --> 00:06:43.519 look at it from the human centric Lens. First, I'm scrolling through the 97 00:06:43.560 --> 00:06:46.079 Internet and I see a piece of content. It's happens to be an add 98 00:06:46.240 --> 00:06:49.829 great, happens to be from COCACOLA. Great. Is it interesting, amazing? 99 00:06:50.509 --> 00:06:55.350 Is it offensive, terrible? Is it getting in my way? It's 100 00:06:56.230 --> 00:06:59.870 maybe effective to hold someone's eyes open and force them to watch your ads, 101 00:07:00.509 --> 00:07:03.259 but in most cases there's a better way. Sometimes I even like that's ackwork 102 00:07:03.500 --> 00:07:08.379 engine alogy, like holding their eyes open. Yeah, really, we have 103 00:07:08.420 --> 00:07:10.899 video right now, so I'll do it. But like it's the clockwork orange, 104 00:07:10.939 --> 00:07:13.060 you know, hold your eyes open to make you watch the ADS. 105 00:07:13.540 --> 00:07:15.209 There is persuasion that can happen that way. If you hold some of these 106 00:07:15.250 --> 00:07:18.410 eyes open in a movie theater and you watch them watch trailers, that's a 107 00:07:18.649 --> 00:07:21.769 that is an effective form of advertising. You know, if you continue to 108 00:07:21.850 --> 00:07:25.930 bombard somebody with TV ads that they say this, see the same ad fifty 109 00:07:26.009 --> 00:07:29.649 times, they have no choice but to watch it. You might get through 110 00:07:29.649 --> 00:07:31.519 to them. But there is a better way, and to me the better 111 00:07:31.600 --> 00:07:36.600 way for most people who you don't want to interrupt or force is to approach 112 00:07:36.639 --> 00:07:41.759 them as a human and deliver content. Even if you're spending money to advertise 113 00:07:41.879 --> 00:07:46.029 that content, deliver content that actually a normal human being might be interested in. 114 00:07:46.550 --> 00:07:48.670 Yeah, I imagine, you know, because the people behind these ad 115 00:07:48.870 --> 00:07:53.949 campaigns are not, you know, there's not stupid people, they're not horrible 116 00:07:54.029 --> 00:08:00.100 people, but I think oftentimes there's just we kind of went here and we 117 00:08:00.180 --> 00:08:03.660 didn't really think about it from the other side it without, you know, 118 00:08:03.019 --> 00:08:07.420 throwing anyone under the bus or naming any names. Are there any examples you 119 00:08:07.500 --> 00:08:11.300 could share, Dan, where someone was like yeah, that seems fine, 120 00:08:11.620 --> 00:08:13.769 and then you guys kind of pushed back and said, well, hold on 121 00:08:13.889 --> 00:08:16.730 a second, think about it this way, and they were like, oh, 122 00:08:16.769 --> 00:08:20.810 yeah, that really is kind of going in this direction that we've always 123 00:08:20.970 --> 00:08:26.050 said we'd never want to go. Yeah, sometimes what happens here, I 124 00:08:26.129 --> 00:08:28.600 think this is like perfect metaphor for what you're asking. Sometimes what happens is, 125 00:08:28.639 --> 00:08:31.879 in a sales pitch or sales meetian or strategy session, will sit down 126 00:08:31.919 --> 00:08:35.639 with a brand and say here's your page full of all your banners. I've 127 00:08:35.679 --> 00:08:39.279 just found them. I went to motecom and search for Um, I just 128 00:08:39.360 --> 00:08:43.029 found some of your banners on the Internet. Let's look at them together and 129 00:08:43.149 --> 00:08:46.750 let's look at these banners and look at the words inside the banners and type 130 00:08:46.830 --> 00:08:50.750 those words out on the screen. So not inside the banner and all the 131 00:08:50.830 --> 00:08:54.230 colorful fonts and everything, but just take the words out and just put them 132 00:08:54.269 --> 00:08:56.419 on the page. Maybe make them in the form of a headline, like 133 00:08:56.539 --> 00:09:00.899 put those words under the banner in a font that looks like a headline, 134 00:09:00.940 --> 00:09:03.139 like a normal person might actually read it. Often what happens is the buyer 135 00:09:03.179 --> 00:09:07.419 goes wait, I don't want people to read that sentence. That sounds make 136 00:09:07.500 --> 00:09:11.049 no sense, that sends is nonsense, that it might have made sense in 137 00:09:11.129 --> 00:09:15.490 our ad, but also, like did it really maybe it didn't even make 138 00:09:15.529 --> 00:09:18.730 a sense in our ad at all. And so sometimes if you just squint 139 00:09:18.730 --> 00:09:22.009 at your ads and you actually look at them with a different mindset of the 140 00:09:22.009 --> 00:09:26.240 human and then you just read your own ads, read the words. I'm 141 00:09:26.279 --> 00:09:31.000 looking at a page here, just like, I don't know, don't forget 142 00:09:31.200 --> 00:09:35.000 these is some text, I see, and an ad for wine here or 143 00:09:35.120 --> 00:09:41.029 like explore our selection. Okay, but like that's the most boring sense I've 144 00:09:41.070 --> 00:09:45.149 ever heard. Explore our selection. How about, like explore our new selection 145 00:09:45.389 --> 00:09:50.269 of discounted wines from France, and even that's pretty boring, but at least 146 00:09:50.269 --> 00:09:54.860 it's a human sentence. There's so many examples where somebody will say, like 147 00:09:54.860 --> 00:09:58.299 here's my ad, here's my banner. Share through says cool, let his 148 00:09:58.340 --> 00:10:01.740 help you pull the text out of the banner, make it a headline and 149 00:10:01.820 --> 00:10:05.059 make it sort of fit into the page, and at that point the buyer 150 00:10:05.100 --> 00:10:07.889 goes Woa, right, I don't want to put those words on the page. 151 00:10:07.210 --> 00:10:09.809 It's like, if you don't want the words on the page, why 152 00:10:09.809 --> 00:10:13.809 are they in the banner? Yeah, they're. So remove the copy from 153 00:10:13.850 --> 00:10:16.649 from the context of the creative and just look at that, because it's got 154 00:10:16.769 --> 00:10:20.929 a start with the copy. It's going to be get like the creative is 155 00:10:20.090 --> 00:10:24.960 going to help it succeed or fail. But there's only so much lipstick you 156 00:10:24.000 --> 00:10:28.600 can put on a pig right to borrow and and old phrase. So yeah, 157 00:10:28.600 --> 00:10:31.960 I think what happens here sometimes, just sorry to flow on that, 158 00:10:31.000 --> 00:10:33.840 I think sometimes it happens is that the buyer says, look, I got 159 00:10:33.919 --> 00:10:37.190 to run a bad campaign and I need to make a square ad and it's 160 00:10:37.190 --> 00:10:39.629 got to have our picture, of our logo and a button inside of it, 161 00:10:39.750 --> 00:10:43.590 and okay, well, what word should be there? Let's put the 162 00:10:43.669 --> 00:10:46.870 word original and fresh. Okay, fine, what does that mean to a 163 00:10:46.870 --> 00:10:48.909 human? I don't know, like what are you trying to tell me? 164 00:10:50.820 --> 00:10:52.419 Like the way to think about it best is like if you were to write 165 00:10:52.419 --> 00:11:01.539 this as a email subject line or calendar meeting header or just a text message 166 00:11:01.539 --> 00:11:05.850 you might send to someone. It's so and so brand has a new X 167 00:11:05.929 --> 00:11:11.769 Y Z that does something interesting period or apple launches the new I phone. 168 00:11:11.809 --> 00:11:16.970 Eleven. Fine, you know, Nike releases the New Lebron James Shoe. 169 00:11:16.330 --> 00:11:20.639 Cool. Like treat it as news, almost, like not like silicious news, 170 00:11:20.679 --> 00:11:24.480 but just simple sentences with a noun and a verb and predicate, just 171 00:11:24.600 --> 00:11:28.320 like what is this that age trying to say? Eleven year old? That 172 00:11:28.399 --> 00:11:31.639 are just going through parts of the sentence and stuff like that right now. 173 00:11:31.320 --> 00:11:37.549 I love one separating the copy from the creative, and then also something that 174 00:11:37.629 --> 00:11:39.789 you just mentioned. I think a lot of people would. It would cause 175 00:11:39.830 --> 00:11:43.870 them an unlock taking the copy, separating it from the creative, typing it 176 00:11:43.950 --> 00:11:46.820 out in a Google doc and, like you said, maybe formatting it like 177 00:11:46.860 --> 00:11:50.419 a headline. And then you said, like what I text a friend this, 178 00:11:50.620 --> 00:11:54.620 would they know what I'm saying. Would they find this weird? Would 179 00:11:54.620 --> 00:11:58.179 they find this confusing? Literally, take the copy and type it out on 180 00:11:58.299 --> 00:12:03.090 your phone into a Google doc or into a blank text message and see how 181 00:12:03.129 --> 00:12:07.889 that feels, because it's interesting the way you remove the context and you change 182 00:12:07.009 --> 00:12:11.330 channels. Then you're in a mode of like this is how I communicate with 183 00:12:11.450 --> 00:12:16.240 my buddies or my mom or my significant other, and all of a sudden 184 00:12:16.279 --> 00:12:20.279 you look at the words differently. Right. Absolutely, and I love what 185 00:12:20.360 --> 00:12:24.879 you just said. Changing the medium just changes the way that your your brain 186 00:12:26.000 --> 00:12:28.440 processes the text. Maybe a text message is a little too far, but 187 00:12:28.519 --> 00:12:31.710 even just an email subject line, write it as an email subject line. 188 00:12:33.710 --> 00:12:37.230 If that email subject line is nonsensical and you would never want to send that 189 00:12:37.309 --> 00:12:41.669 to a customer prospect, don't put into an add yeah, absolutely, man. 190 00:12:41.990 --> 00:12:43.820 So number one is being more human centric. I think we got to 191 00:12:43.940 --> 00:12:50.179 some knitty gritty examples there. Your second tip is making sure that your ads 192 00:12:50.179 --> 00:12:56.179 are actually getting to the best endpoint, and this seems like kind of rudimentary 193 00:12:56.220 --> 00:13:00.970 advice, but you see this as a misstep for a lot of brands that 194 00:13:01.049 --> 00:13:03.090 are advertising right now. Right. Yeah, yeah, so this might get 195 00:13:03.129 --> 00:13:07.210 a little bit programmatic Geeky, maybe not technical, but just sort of programmatic 196 00:13:07.289 --> 00:13:11.330 inside baseball. So if you're listening and you're like I don't know what our 197 00:13:11.409 --> 00:13:16.320 TV is or what a DSP is or even what programmatic advertising is, this 198 00:13:16.480 --> 00:13:18.360 next section may not make sense. But if you're like yeah, of course 199 00:13:18.360 --> 00:13:22.080 I know how to do programmatic advertising. I use the trade desk or I 200 00:13:22.120 --> 00:13:24.960 use D be three hundred and sixty or media math or adobe and I run 201 00:13:26.039 --> 00:13:28.870 my ads across addicts and cheer through an index and Rubekon grade, I think 202 00:13:28.909 --> 00:13:31.870 this will be helpful advice. Even if you don't, maybe this is still 203 00:13:31.870 --> 00:13:35.710 helpful in the abstract. The advice here's to be really purposeful and deliberate about 204 00:13:35.750 --> 00:13:39.590 your supply path. So if you use the trade desk as your DSP and 205 00:13:39.750 --> 00:13:43.259 you just say I'm going to target all adds on the Internet, are all 206 00:13:43.259 --> 00:13:46.259 supply site, are all supply partners, or even a site list I want 207 00:13:46.259 --> 00:13:48.779 to run on these six hundred sites, but you don't choose which supply path 208 00:13:48.860 --> 00:13:54.740 you're taking, meaning you don't choose the specific exchanges that act does the conduit 209 00:13:54.779 --> 00:13:58.610 to get you to those sites. Well, we'll usually have that happening is 210 00:13:58.690 --> 00:14:01.769 that most of your budget will flow to Google, most of your budget, 211 00:14:01.809 --> 00:14:07.970 just because Google supply path is a black hole of size. The gravity well 212 00:14:07.049 --> 00:14:11.240 of Google's black hole just sucks in every marketing dollar that comes near it. 213 00:14:11.639 --> 00:14:16.320 So unless you say I want to spend seventy percent on Google and thirty percent 214 00:14:16.360 --> 00:14:20.200 elsewhere, you'll usually end up spending ninety percent on Google. Maybe you want 215 00:14:20.200 --> 00:14:24.669 to spend twenty percent on Google. You know, depends on your campaign strategy. 216 00:14:24.269 --> 00:14:28.070 But really it's just about being purposeful and deliberate about the supply path. 217 00:14:28.110 --> 00:14:31.230 And if you log into your DSP, the trade desk or dv through sixty, 218 00:14:31.269 --> 00:14:33.750 or ask your trading team or your account rep, they're what supply paths, 219 00:14:33.909 --> 00:14:37.269 or even just simply white exchanges am I buying and what's the mix of 220 00:14:39.379 --> 00:14:43.019 spend across exchanges? And you'll often be surprised that most of your spend is 221 00:14:43.059 --> 00:14:46.779 going through the add supply path and then the little bits going elsewhere. And 222 00:14:46.899 --> 00:14:50.460 I would just tie that to maybe the point that can bring this home is 223 00:14:50.580 --> 00:14:54.370 that if Google and ADDEX is your highest performing supply path, all good. 224 00:14:56.409 --> 00:15:00.289 If Google and adds is not your highest performing supply path and you see higher 225 00:15:00.289 --> 00:15:05.370 performance through another path, through the Yahoo supply path, through share, through 226 00:15:05.409 --> 00:15:11.399 through index exchange, through fill in the blank. There's ten other spot x 227 00:15:11.519 --> 00:15:16.960 whatever. If it performs better through another supply path to the same sites with 228 00:15:16.080 --> 00:15:20.919 the same cookie users, with the same targeting, same creatives, so just 229 00:15:20.000 --> 00:15:24.110 different path, but to the same site. If it performs better elsewhere, 230 00:15:24.509 --> 00:15:28.590 spend your money where your performance is ultimately, spend your programmatic marketing dollars through 231 00:15:28.710 --> 00:15:33.629 the supply path that are the highest performance. And even saying that out loud 232 00:15:33.669 --> 00:15:35.779 a little bit silly, but the ecosystem was set up in such a way 233 00:15:35.820 --> 00:15:39.980 that it rewards volume more than performance, and so it's just something that I 234 00:15:41.100 --> 00:15:43.259 think eventually, over the next three or four years, the dsps, maybe 235 00:15:43.340 --> 00:15:50.370 sooner, will start to do more automated automization of supply paths and automated pushing 236 00:15:50.450 --> 00:15:52.570 of your budgets through the supply paths that are the most efficient and the most 237 00:15:52.570 --> 00:15:58.289 performant and the most cost effective from like a cost per click, cost per 238 00:15:58.289 --> 00:16:03.169 view, cost per completed view, costper lead standpoint. But today it's more 239 00:16:03.210 --> 00:16:08.360 actually optimizing across different vectors. So DSP's optimize across the vector of audience or 240 00:16:08.399 --> 00:16:12.399 day parts or sites or whatever, which is also good. But you need 241 00:16:12.440 --> 00:16:18.159 to add in a more purposeful, deliberate approach to optimizing on the vector of 242 00:16:18.240 --> 00:16:21.350 supply path, which, if I say the word supply path and up, 243 00:16:21.350 --> 00:16:25.230 it's going to become meaningless here. But supply path meaning you're running your ad 244 00:16:25.350 --> 00:16:29.149 through your DSP. It's gonna ultimately arrive on CNNCOM, but the path that 245 00:16:29.269 --> 00:16:32.470 you take to get there will inform how the human being at the end of 246 00:16:32.509 --> 00:16:36.659 it actually sees your ad and will inform the performance of that Ad. And 247 00:16:36.779 --> 00:16:40.460 so of one supply path outperforms another. Just be deliberate about where you spend 248 00:16:40.460 --> 00:16:44.500 your money. Yeah, absolutely. I mean I think we we went through 249 00:16:44.500 --> 00:16:47.690 it very, very sequentially here, Dan. You know, looking at your 250 00:16:47.730 --> 00:16:52.049 copy, looking at the creative looking at where it's being presented and looking at 251 00:16:52.409 --> 00:16:56.529 how it's getting there, because that's going to change how it's actually presented to 252 00:16:56.690 --> 00:17:00.090 the end user. If you have all of those keys in mind, you're 253 00:17:00.129 --> 00:17:03.319 going to be more successful with your ad campaigns. Dan, if anybody listening 254 00:17:03.359 --> 00:17:07.440 to this is going to take one thing away from this episode and and going 255 00:17:07.559 --> 00:17:12.240 implement today, what's that one key takeaway? You want them to walk away 256 00:17:12.240 --> 00:17:18.750 with. Today, if you are programmatic buyer who's really thinking about programmic advertising, 257 00:17:19.430 --> 00:17:25.829 it's spend your programmatic marketing dollars through the paths that are the highest performance. 258 00:17:26.869 --> 00:17:29.950 If it's a low performing path, maybe you want to spend money there, 259 00:17:30.299 --> 00:17:33.019 but at least be aware of it, be deliberate about it, and 260 00:17:33.099 --> 00:17:34.539 it's really easy. That's not some complex thing. You could just go into 261 00:17:34.539 --> 00:17:38.500 your DSP and run the report or ask your trading team or even ask your 262 00:17:38.500 --> 00:17:41.940 DSP account Rep and they'll tell you where you spent your money. Second if 263 00:17:41.980 --> 00:17:45.809 you're not in the world of programmatic and you're really just a marketer thinking about 264 00:17:45.809 --> 00:17:49.490 navigating the landscape, especially this new landscape of the Open Web, my simple 265 00:17:49.490 --> 00:17:53.490 advice is be human with your ads. If you would never email to customer, 266 00:17:53.650 --> 00:17:56.690 don't put in an ad. If you would never post it to your 267 00:17:56.730 --> 00:18:00.000 facebook page, don't put in the AD. If you read it and scratch 268 00:18:00.000 --> 00:18:02.720 your head and say, what the heck does that even mean? Don't put 269 00:18:02.759 --> 00:18:06.319 in the AD. Make the AD sensible, make it comprehensible, make it 270 00:18:06.400 --> 00:18:08.880 respectful and make it human. I love it. Dan. If anybody listening 271 00:18:08.880 --> 00:18:12.150 to this would like to Ping you with a follow up question or two or 272 00:18:12.390 --> 00:18:15.470 stay in touch with you and the team at share through. What's the best 273 00:18:15.509 --> 00:18:18.910 way for them to reach out or stay connected? Man Dan at share throughcom 274 00:18:19.670 --> 00:18:22.789 easy enough. All right. Well, Dan, this has been super useful 275 00:18:22.829 --> 00:18:26.220 stuff. I appreciate you bringing some value to listeners today. Thank you so 276 00:18:26.380 --> 00:18:30.819 much for being our guests on the podcast today. Absolutely thank you for having 277 00:18:30.819 --> 00:18:37.180 me. Are you on Lincoln? That's a stupid question. Of course you're 278 00:18:37.220 --> 00:18:40.660 on Linkedin. Here's so we fish. We've gone all in on the platform. 279 00:18:40.660 --> 00:18:45.049 Multiple people from our team are creating content there. Sometimes it's a funny 280 00:18:45.089 --> 00:18:48.529 gift for me, other times it's a micro video or a slide deck, 281 00:18:48.809 --> 00:18:52.329 and sometimes it's just a regular old status update that shares their unique point of 282 00:18:52.329 --> 00:18:57.480 view on BB marketing leadership or their job function. We're posting this content through 283 00:18:57.519 --> 00:19:03.000 their personal profile, not our company page, and it would warm my heart 284 00:19:03.160 --> 00:19:07.480 and soul if you connected with each of our evangelists. will be adding more 285 00:19:07.720 --> 00:19:11.230 down the road, but for now you should connect with bill read, our 286 00:19:11.309 --> 00:19:15.150 COO, Kelsey Montgomery, our creative director, Dan Sanchez, our director of 287 00:19:15.190 --> 00:19:19.990 audience growth, Logan Lyles are director of partnerships, and me, James Carberry. 288 00:19:21.190 --> 00:19:23.339 We are having a whole lot of fun on Linkedin pretty much every single 289 00:19:23.420 --> 00:19:26.299 day, and we'd love for you to be a part of it