Transcript
WEBVTT
1
00:00:08.240 --> 00:00:12.880
Conversations from the front lines of marketing. This is B two B Growth.
2
00:00:17.640 --> 00:00:21.600
Welcome to the journey here on B
two B Growth, where we're documenting our
3
00:00:21.679 --> 00:00:25.559
journey of turning B two B growth. This show into every B two B
4
00:00:25.640 --> 00:00:30.800
marketers favorite media brand and how you
can do the same for your market I'm
5
00:00:30.839 --> 00:00:36.479
joined today by Dan Sanchez, our
executive producer, and my name is James
6
00:00:36.520 --> 00:00:40.719
Carberry. I'm the founder of sweet
Fish, and today we're gonna be talking
7
00:00:40.759 --> 00:00:45.920
about a post that I actually put
up on LinkedIn on Saturday. So one
8
00:00:45.960 --> 00:00:48.799
of the posts I think had over
a hundred and thirty or a hundred and
9
00:00:48.799 --> 00:00:52.479
forty different engagements, lots of comments, and so I'm just gonna kick it
10
00:00:52.520 --> 00:00:55.880
off by reading what the post was
that I posted on Saturday, and then
11
00:00:56.399 --> 00:01:00.240
Dan, have you kind of chime
in with your thoughts Looking through of the
12
00:01:00.280 --> 00:01:03.880
comments, We've got some really affirming
comments in this thing. So here's how
13
00:01:03.920 --> 00:01:07.480
it starts, and said, the
next evolution of marketing is media, which
14
00:01:07.519 --> 00:01:11.239
means the next evolution of the VP
of marketing role is the role of the
15
00:01:11.239 --> 00:01:15.799
executive producer. Modern marketing teams needs
someone that can architect the media brand that
16
00:01:15.840 --> 00:01:21.760
becomes your markets favorite source of information
on the Internet, developed compelling concepts and
17
00:01:21.799 --> 00:01:26.640
formats for the content franchises within that
media brand, so newsletters, podcast,
18
00:01:26.719 --> 00:01:30.640
YouTube channels, etcetera. We've in
the company's points of view into the stories
19
00:01:30.680 --> 00:01:37.680
being told inside the various content franchises, connect the media being created to the
20
00:01:37.719 --> 00:01:42.400
business objectives that need to be achieved. The executive producer is ultimately responsible for
21
00:01:42.439 --> 00:01:47.280
creating an irrational bias towards your brand, a bias so strong that your competition
22
00:01:47.280 --> 00:01:52.599
doesn't matter because the media you produce
creates an affinity that can't be beaten.
23
00:01:53.079 --> 00:01:57.200
Dan, why do you think this
kind of point of view? This post
24
00:01:57.359 --> 00:02:00.640
did as well as it did?
Man, that's soon as I saw it,
25
00:02:00.680 --> 00:02:04.040
I was like, yes, this
is it essentially is it's a baby
26
00:02:04.079 --> 00:02:07.319
step towards flushing out our hypothesis abound
building a media brand. You're like,
27
00:02:07.400 --> 00:02:12.479
yes, let's define the roles within
a media brand, like who's the new
28
00:02:12.560 --> 00:02:15.439
this? How does it all work? And of course I think the post
29
00:02:15.520 --> 00:02:17.719
did well because there were some people
who freaking loved it. They're like,
30
00:02:17.960 --> 00:02:23.599
Oh, I've been looking for this, Like I've been wrestling with my role
31
00:02:23.680 --> 00:02:27.039
on how to define it and clearly
articulated. Then there's some others that are
32
00:02:27.080 --> 00:02:30.800
like, is this just the new
thing for marketing? Is this the new
33
00:02:30.800 --> 00:02:35.000
black? Like, what are we
talking about? We're just throwing around terms.
34
00:02:35.560 --> 00:02:37.759
So there's a kind of a lot
of people on both sides of the
35
00:02:37.800 --> 00:02:42.759
aisle saying yes or no, and
those are what posts usually do well.
36
00:02:43.280 --> 00:02:46.039
James, you actually approached this topic
a while ago, even just a few
37
00:02:46.039 --> 00:02:51.080
weeks ago talking to me about it. What triggered in your mind when you
38
00:02:51.159 --> 00:02:58.120
first thought about changing marketing titles over
to media titles. Yeah, so as
39
00:02:58.159 --> 00:03:02.199
of a few weeks ago, we
really made the decision that our marketing that
40
00:03:02.280 --> 00:03:07.479
sweet Fish is marketing would become we
were putting all of our chips into B
41
00:03:07.479 --> 00:03:13.319
two B growth and so having Benji, Emily and you all focused on B
42
00:03:13.360 --> 00:03:17.800
two B growth and that was really
our marketing spent was are we growing B
43
00:03:17.879 --> 00:03:23.159
two B growth? Are we tying
the business objectives of the company to the
44
00:03:23.240 --> 00:03:29.560
results of BtoB growth? Is BDB
growth tangibly doing the work that it needs
45
00:03:29.599 --> 00:03:32.680
to do to actually drive revenue for
Sweet Fish? Now we're starting more and
46
00:03:32.719 --> 00:03:38.360
more to think about like monetizing B
two B growth as a standalone asset.
47
00:03:38.439 --> 00:03:44.199
So because knowing that affinity takes time
to convert to revenue, but affinity is
48
00:03:44.240 --> 00:03:49.000
absolutely the best path toward revenue.
It doesn't show up on a spreadsheet quickly,
49
00:03:49.520 --> 00:03:53.240
and even when it does convert to
revenue, it's sometimes often hard to
50
00:03:53.120 --> 00:03:59.000
attribute it to the work you did
with the media brand, because the media
51
00:03:59.039 --> 00:04:00.680
brand is kind of the tip of
spear, and it's how somebody starts to
52
00:04:00.719 --> 00:04:05.159
get acclimated to your ecosystem in your
world. But then it could be a
53
00:04:05.159 --> 00:04:09.879
blog post that they read three weeks
after getting introduced to the show that really
54
00:04:09.960 --> 00:04:12.680
put them over the top. Or
it could be a conversation that they had
55
00:04:12.759 --> 00:04:15.399
with somebody one of our people on
LinkedIn, so they attributed it to LinkedIn
56
00:04:15.480 --> 00:04:19.000
instead of it being attributed to they
found B TWOB growth first. And so
57
00:04:19.600 --> 00:04:26.240
I think the more I've thought about
our own marketing being really dumped into B
58
00:04:26.319 --> 00:04:30.040
two B growth, the more I
thought, and this is how modern marketing
59
00:04:30.519 --> 00:04:34.480
is going to work. I think
traditionally you've had a lot of marketers that
60
00:04:34.480 --> 00:04:40.240
have focused on funnels and focused on
conversion metrics, and I think that is
61
00:04:40.279 --> 00:04:44.759
still needed. This post wasn't intended
to say that everything that the VP of
62
00:04:44.800 --> 00:04:48.319
marketing was doing before isn't necessary.
And I think some people kind of took
63
00:04:48.319 --> 00:04:53.040
it that way by saying, Okay, is this just the next fad?
64
00:04:53.399 --> 00:04:57.240
Is this just us kind of giving
marketing another name yet again. I think
65
00:04:57.319 --> 00:05:00.160
there's certainly some tiredness to that,
with all the talk around strategic narrative,
66
00:05:00.199 --> 00:05:05.399
old game, new game, category
creation. I think marketers in particularly are
67
00:05:05.399 --> 00:05:09.199
getting a little bit iy rolly about
that stuff because it's like, Okay,
68
00:05:09.240 --> 00:05:13.560
sure, tell me that marketing is
completely changed yet again. But I think
69
00:05:13.639 --> 00:05:18.600
that this approach to marketing really focusing
on the media is actually what content marketing
70
00:05:18.639 --> 00:05:23.519
intended to do. I think when
you look at Joe Politici and what he
71
00:05:23.600 --> 00:05:29.240
intended to build whenever he built the
content marketing category was that you would put
72
00:05:29.279 --> 00:05:33.079
so much effort into the content and
making the content so good that it would
73
00:05:33.120 --> 00:05:36.800
give you that a rational bias,
It would give someone that affinity towards your
74
00:05:36.839 --> 00:05:42.800
brand. But I think a lot
of marketers kind of bastardized that, and
75
00:05:43.240 --> 00:05:46.399
not always because being their own fault, because they've got senior executives that are
76
00:05:46.439 --> 00:05:50.319
breathing down their their neck about needing
m q L s and and needing to
77
00:05:50.399 --> 00:05:55.800
justify what we're doing with this quote
unquote content marketing thing. We need revenue,
78
00:05:56.279 --> 00:06:00.720
and so content marketing started to resemble
more and more product marketing. It's
79
00:06:00.759 --> 00:06:02.560
just like, how can we figure
out how to talk about our product in
80
00:06:02.600 --> 00:06:08.279
a disguised way? And this is
really a retreat from that and saying no,
81
00:06:08.399 --> 00:06:12.680
let's go back to the original intent
of what content marketing should be.
82
00:06:13.279 --> 00:06:15.360
And do we name it something different? I don't know, but one of
83
00:06:15.399 --> 00:06:19.639
the things that I'm thinking about is
like starts by roll definition and if you're
84
00:06:19.639 --> 00:06:25.680
going to treat a media property differently
than how we've traditionally been treating content marketing,
85
00:06:25.800 --> 00:06:29.800
it's way more than just blog posts
that rank for keywords. It's funny
86
00:06:30.079 --> 00:06:35.199
the original I remember watching um that
content marketing documentary. Right, it's a
87
00:06:35.959 --> 00:06:39.879
if you haven't seen it, like
just google content marketing documentary. It's a
88
00:06:39.920 --> 00:06:43.079
great little video about like the origin
of it, and it goes all the
89
00:06:43.120 --> 00:06:46.480
way back to like John Deere rolling
out their magazine The Furrow. Right,
90
00:06:47.120 --> 00:06:50.680
it's over a hundred years old,
and they weren't even talking about John Deer
91
00:06:50.720 --> 00:06:55.199
detractors they were, or good equipment. They were just talking about stuff farmers
92
00:06:55.240 --> 00:06:59.079
found relatively useful they knew, like
John Deere put it out, but it
93
00:06:59.199 --> 00:07:01.600
wasn't a product thing. It was
a media brand. It was a magazine
94
00:07:01.639 --> 00:07:05.160
in and of itself. And that's
ultimately where we want to bring it back.
95
00:07:05.160 --> 00:07:09.240
And I think you're right in that
it's a lot of content marketing has
96
00:07:09.279 --> 00:07:12.360
become product marketing. But even when
it's not, even when it's a how
97
00:07:12.399 --> 00:07:15.959
to list that's broader than the product
that they sell, it still has this
98
00:07:16.240 --> 00:07:21.639
flavor of marketing in it, right. It still has marketing in its goal,
99
00:07:21.680 --> 00:07:26.920
and you can feel it by the
five pop ups that jump out.
100
00:07:27.160 --> 00:07:30.399
You know, it's kind of like
and it's on the company blog and it's
101
00:07:30.399 --> 00:07:34.240
branded across the top and a big
footer, and it's written by somebody who's
102
00:07:34.279 --> 00:07:38.920
not actually a subject matter expert and
what the customer cares about. It's written
103
00:07:38.920 --> 00:07:42.920
by a content person that the company
hired to put this out so that they
104
00:07:42.959 --> 00:07:46.560
could get traffic to their website.
And the whole thing has a flavor to
105
00:07:46.639 --> 00:07:50.720
it that just feels like marketing,
right, and it's not even as helpful
106
00:07:50.720 --> 00:07:54.839
as it needs to be. So
I think by repositioning it a little bit
107
00:07:54.920 --> 00:07:57.240
is actually useful, and that's our
take on it. Of course, some
108
00:07:57.279 --> 00:08:01.199
people there's always, like you said, I rolls when you trying to change
109
00:08:01.240 --> 00:08:03.639
the way people talk about things.
Because marketers are good at that, we
110
00:08:03.680 --> 00:08:07.920
do it a lot um, sometimes
more successful in others. Some of the
111
00:08:07.920 --> 00:08:11.480
pushback that I've heard in other posts
whenever I talk about companies needing to become
112
00:08:11.480 --> 00:08:15.600
media companies. One of the guys
I'm thinking of right now is I think
113
00:08:15.600 --> 00:08:18.879
a friend of yours Dan, But
he's basically pushing back on that because media
114
00:08:18.920 --> 00:08:24.160
companies are a really hard business model, like creating content that is so good
115
00:08:24.199 --> 00:08:31.120
that other companies trying to reach your
target audience are willing to pay you to
116
00:08:31.240 --> 00:08:35.879
get talked about or to get in
front of the exact people that your content
117
00:08:35.279 --> 00:08:39.919
reaches because of how good it is. And so the investment that you have
118
00:08:41.000 --> 00:08:45.200
to make in making that content and
then what you can actually sell in terms
119
00:08:45.200 --> 00:08:48.960
of what people are willing to pay
to get in front of that audience,
120
00:08:48.440 --> 00:08:52.600
that business model is. It can
be very challenging, but I think it's
121
00:08:52.600 --> 00:08:56.000
actually helpful at least since we've started
having these conversations with B two B growth
122
00:08:56.039 --> 00:08:58.720
and thinking about how we can start
doing this for our client shows. I
123
00:08:58.799 --> 00:09:03.639
think gets actually helpful to think about
how can you monetize the media itself,
124
00:09:03.679 --> 00:09:07.519
because it's a forcing function for you
to make sure that that content is good
125
00:09:07.600 --> 00:09:11.759
in and of itself. Curious to
get your thoughts. Do you think that
126
00:09:11.759 --> 00:09:18.360
that departure of trying to tie your
media brand directly to revenue is like do
127
00:09:18.399 --> 00:09:20.480
you think I've swung too far the
other way and trying to make the media
128
00:09:20.519 --> 00:09:26.360
brand pay for itself? No?
No, I think that should be everybody's
129
00:09:26.399 --> 00:09:30.960
goal. Not everybody will get there, and that's okay because it will still
130
00:09:30.960 --> 00:09:35.480
work and generate revenue for your business. But if you can make it big
131
00:09:35.600 --> 00:09:39.039
enough and attractive enough for other people
to sponsor and essentially create like a perpetual
132
00:09:39.759 --> 00:09:43.759
marketing machine, I think of like
perpetual emotion. I'm a nerd. I
133
00:09:43.159 --> 00:09:48.480
love studying how people have made perpetual
emotion machines, and even though it's technically
134
00:09:48.519 --> 00:09:50.440
like impossible, right, but still, I just love the idea of it
135
00:09:50.480 --> 00:09:54.159
in physics, of something that just
never stops. I'm like, man,
136
00:09:54.200 --> 00:09:58.759
I want that in marketing. It's
also impossible marketing for the long term,
137
00:09:58.840 --> 00:10:01.200
like eventually like you have to put
massive effort or things into it to make
138
00:10:01.240 --> 00:10:03.799
it go again. But like,
if I can get it to the point
139
00:10:03.799 --> 00:10:09.919
where a marketing channel that's making revenue
for my company pays for itself, I
140
00:10:09.919 --> 00:10:13.279
want to call out a few things
here, Dan some comments that popped up
141
00:10:13.279 --> 00:10:18.519
on this post. One was really
really encouraging to me from Tyler Lossard,
142
00:10:18.600 --> 00:10:24.039
who, in my opinion, might
be executing this whole media brand strategy that
143
00:10:24.080 --> 00:10:28.320
we're advocating for better than anyone and
B two B right now through a media
144
00:10:28.360 --> 00:10:33.879
brand called sales Feed. Now,
Tyler Lessard is the CMO of Vidyard,
145
00:10:35.039 --> 00:10:39.720
so like a video email platform,
and they've created a separate media brand called
146
00:10:39.759 --> 00:10:43.799
sales Feed. They've staffed it with
I thinks Will Aikin was actually a sales
147
00:10:43.879 --> 00:10:48.000
influencer and so his comment on the
post was, Oh my gosh, I've
148
00:10:48.000 --> 00:10:52.240
been trying to figure out how to
articulate the evolution of my role and this
149
00:10:52.320 --> 00:10:56.879
is it off to update my LinkedIn
profile. Another comment my friend Obed Dorani.
150
00:10:58.120 --> 00:11:00.879
He said, easy dream job,
Where do I sign up? Oh?
151
00:11:00.919 --> 00:11:03.480
Oh? Bet is the living embodiment
of thinking about content this way?
152
00:11:03.600 --> 00:11:09.120
Him him, Todd Klausser Emily Brady, you know, from our team,
153
00:11:09.200 --> 00:11:11.600
is kind of in that crew.
They hang out with Will Aching a lot
154
00:11:11.639 --> 00:11:15.840
too, so they're living and breathing
this. There was one comment here from
155
00:11:15.960 --> 00:11:20.080
David Uraguay. He said, it
sounds about right to me. Head of
156
00:11:20.120 --> 00:11:24.600
brand strategy times head of product marketing
equals modern VP of marketing. I struggle
157
00:11:26.080 --> 00:11:31.320
with that common a little bit in
terms of like brand strategy times head of
158
00:11:31.399 --> 00:11:35.759
product marketing, that's a lot of
product marketing in the mix there. I
159
00:11:35.759 --> 00:11:39.159
mean, you're basically just saying it's
a combo of brand strategy and product marketing.
160
00:11:39.440 --> 00:11:43.440
I think the product marketing has to
be lesser. I think that's the
161
00:11:43.480 --> 00:11:48.399
mistake we've made traditionally, is making
product marketing too much a part of the
162
00:11:48.440 --> 00:11:52.639
media brand, and it ends up
breaking trust with the audience because people can
163
00:11:52.679 --> 00:11:56.279
see that, oh, you're just
really trying to sling a product, and
164
00:11:56.360 --> 00:12:00.360
I think there's a line there.
You don't want to pretend to become copletely
165
00:12:00.399 --> 00:12:03.919
unbiased. We talk on Sweet Fish
a lot about how like we're not mother
166
00:12:03.039 --> 00:12:09.159
Teresa, We're not just doing this
because we've got this altruistic heart to try
167
00:12:09.159 --> 00:12:11.720
to help marketers get better at their
job. No, we know that if
168
00:12:11.720 --> 00:12:16.240
we help marketers create an unfair advantage
in their work, then that affinity towards
169
00:12:16.240 --> 00:12:18.960
sweet Fish is going to result in
dollars for our business. And so that's
170
00:12:20.000 --> 00:12:24.519
my one issue with that comment from
David is a man. Maybe it's brand
171
00:12:24.600 --> 00:12:31.279
strategy, it's strategic editorial meets you
know, a light version. Maybe it's
172
00:12:31.679 --> 00:12:35.600
head of product marketing divided by two
would be the closer to the equation that
173
00:12:35.679 --> 00:12:39.720
I'm thinking of there. And then
another comment from Asher Matthew. He says,
174
00:12:39.799 --> 00:12:43.840
is this another case of what's old
is new? Was this true for
175
00:12:43.960 --> 00:12:46.320
vps of marketing before demand gen became
such a focus for them? I think
176
00:12:46.320 --> 00:12:52.440
the way I responded to Asher's comment
was, I actually think that by executing
177
00:12:52.480 --> 00:12:58.600
a media brand strategy, well,
I think it's still demand gen, but
178
00:12:58.080 --> 00:13:03.440
it is. I think you first
got to create demand for your media,
179
00:13:03.720 --> 00:13:09.919
and then once you've created a raving
desire for your media, then it expedites
180
00:13:09.960 --> 00:13:13.200
the effectiveness of the demand that you're
going to create for your product when you
181
00:13:13.360 --> 00:13:18.279
do strategically figure out how to integrate
your product into that media. What are
182
00:13:18.279 --> 00:13:22.639
your thoughts there, Dan, I
think you're writing that you're setting up a
183
00:13:22.679 --> 00:13:26.480
separate brand. It is a separate
brand, Should it tie it nicely to
184
00:13:26.519 --> 00:13:28.399
your other brand? Yes, but
it doesn't even need to be like a
185
00:13:28.440 --> 00:13:33.080
sub brand necessarily of your brand and
like creatively all fit together a nice package.
186
00:13:33.080 --> 00:13:37.279
You can just needs to be a
separate brand to create separations so you
187
00:13:37.320 --> 00:13:41.240
can position it differently than your other
brand. Right, the positioning on these
188
00:13:41.279 --> 00:13:43.440
two things are probably going to be
different once. Probably your media brand is
189
00:13:43.440 --> 00:13:46.960
gonna be broader, right because you
should have tooken a niche positioning within whatever
190
00:13:48.000 --> 00:13:50.039
industry you're playing in. Yours is
going to be brought. The media brand
191
00:13:50.039 --> 00:13:56.600
is gonna be all encompassing for everything
your buyers love. So you're actually creating
192
00:13:56.639 --> 00:14:00.639
marketing for your media and treating it
like its own little mini copenny within your
193
00:14:00.639 --> 00:14:03.240
company. And I think you can
do that with just a few employees,
194
00:14:03.279 --> 00:14:07.759
like it doesn't take a huge media
team. That's the other pushback we got
195
00:14:07.799 --> 00:14:09.039
is, oh, this is too
expensive. It's too expensive. I don't
196
00:14:09.039 --> 00:14:11.360
think it needs to be. I
mean, we're executing this with B two
197
00:14:11.360 --> 00:14:16.240
B growth, with a three person
team. We're gonna wind this one down.
198
00:14:16.759 --> 00:14:18.960
But I love having these conversations I
love kind of giving a peek behind
199
00:14:18.960 --> 00:14:22.919
the curtain of how we're thinking about
this at sweet Fish and how B TWOB
200
00:14:24.000 --> 00:14:28.720
growth is playing into too our company
strategy. It's not just this kind of
201
00:14:28.759 --> 00:14:31.679
side piece that so many companies look
at their podcast. It's just like this
202
00:14:31.720 --> 00:14:35.559
little tactical thing over on the side. Now, this is central to our
203
00:14:35.600 --> 00:14:39.000
company's growth strategy, and I think
that should be how other marketing leaders are
204
00:14:39.039 --> 00:14:43.240
looking at their media brand as well. So thank you all so much for
205
00:14:43.279 --> 00:14:46.679
listening. Um Dan, thanks for
jumping on here and talking through this.
206
00:14:48.360 --> 00:14:50.759
That's it for today's episode of the
Journey. Remember there are a lot of
207
00:14:50.879 --> 00:14:56.360
ways to win in B two B
marketing, but commodity content is the enemy.
208
00:14:56.639 --> 00:15:01.120
Focus on affinity over awareness. Don't
just be this able, be memorable
209
00:15:01.200 --> 00:15:05.559
for all things GDP growth. Visit
GDP Growth Show dot com and connect with
210
00:15:05.639 --> 00:15:07.440
us over on LinkedIn. We're out.