Every Friday we share one non-obvious insight from your favorite creators in our newsletter.
Nov. 18, 2022

How To Scale a Media Company Within B2B | The Journey

This is the Journey on B2B Growth, where we document our journey of turning B2B Growth into every B2B marketers’ favorite media brand…and how you can do the same for your market. Today James and Dan discuss the role of an Executive Producer as the...

The player is loading ...
B2B Growth
This is the Journey on B2B Growth, where we document our journey of turning B2B Growth into every B2B marketers’ favorite media brand…and how you can do the same for your market. Today James and Dan discuss the role of an Executive Producer as the next evolution for modern B2B marketing teams.  
Sponsors:  
If you’re hiring, you need Indeed.
Sign up and get a $75 credit to sponsor your first job for better visibility, more applications and quicker hiring times. Stay in control with payment billing options, no long term contracts, pay for only what you need and pause spending at any time.* 
Claim Your Credit 
*Sponsored Job credit offers available only for new U.S. accounts posting a job that expires one year after account creation. Upon expiration of credits, users are charged based on their Sponsored Job budget. Terms, conditions, and quality standards apply.
Transcript
WEBVTT 1 00:00:08.240 --> 00:00:12.880 Conversations from the front lines of marketing. This is B two B Growth. 2 00:00:17.640 --> 00:00:21.600 Welcome to the journey here on B two B Growth, where we're documenting our 3 00:00:21.679 --> 00:00:25.559 journey of turning B two B growth. This show into every B two B 4 00:00:25.640 --> 00:00:30.800 marketers favorite media brand and how you can do the same for your market I'm 5 00:00:30.839 --> 00:00:36.479 joined today by Dan Sanchez, our executive producer, and my name is James 6 00:00:36.520 --> 00:00:40.719 Carberry. I'm the founder of sweet Fish, and today we're gonna be talking 7 00:00:40.759 --> 00:00:45.920 about a post that I actually put up on LinkedIn on Saturday. So one 8 00:00:45.960 --> 00:00:48.799 of the posts I think had over a hundred and thirty or a hundred and 9 00:00:48.799 --> 00:00:52.479 forty different engagements, lots of comments, and so I'm just gonna kick it 10 00:00:52.520 --> 00:00:55.880 off by reading what the post was that I posted on Saturday, and then 11 00:00:56.399 --> 00:01:00.240 Dan, have you kind of chime in with your thoughts Looking through of the 12 00:01:00.280 --> 00:01:03.880 comments, We've got some really affirming comments in this thing. So here's how 13 00:01:03.920 --> 00:01:07.480 it starts, and said, the next evolution of marketing is media, which 14 00:01:07.519 --> 00:01:11.239 means the next evolution of the VP of marketing role is the role of the 15 00:01:11.239 --> 00:01:15.799 executive producer. Modern marketing teams needs someone that can architect the media brand that 16 00:01:15.840 --> 00:01:21.760 becomes your markets favorite source of information on the Internet, developed compelling concepts and 17 00:01:21.799 --> 00:01:26.640 formats for the content franchises within that media brand, so newsletters, podcast, 18 00:01:26.719 --> 00:01:30.640 YouTube channels, etcetera. We've in the company's points of view into the stories 19 00:01:30.680 --> 00:01:37.680 being told inside the various content franchises, connect the media being created to the 20 00:01:37.719 --> 00:01:42.400 business objectives that need to be achieved. The executive producer is ultimately responsible for 21 00:01:42.439 --> 00:01:47.280 creating an irrational bias towards your brand, a bias so strong that your competition 22 00:01:47.280 --> 00:01:52.599 doesn't matter because the media you produce creates an affinity that can't be beaten. 23 00:01:53.079 --> 00:01:57.200 Dan, why do you think this kind of point of view? This post 24 00:01:57.359 --> 00:02:00.640 did as well as it did? Man, that's soon as I saw it, 25 00:02:00.680 --> 00:02:04.040 I was like, yes, this is it essentially is it's a baby 26 00:02:04.079 --> 00:02:07.319 step towards flushing out our hypothesis abound building a media brand. You're like, 27 00:02:07.400 --> 00:02:12.479 yes, let's define the roles within a media brand, like who's the new 28 00:02:12.560 --> 00:02:15.439 this? How does it all work? And of course I think the post 29 00:02:15.520 --> 00:02:17.719 did well because there were some people who freaking loved it. They're like, 30 00:02:17.960 --> 00:02:23.599 Oh, I've been looking for this, Like I've been wrestling with my role 31 00:02:23.680 --> 00:02:27.039 on how to define it and clearly articulated. Then there's some others that are 32 00:02:27.080 --> 00:02:30.800 like, is this just the new thing for marketing? Is this the new 33 00:02:30.800 --> 00:02:35.000 black? Like, what are we talking about? We're just throwing around terms. 34 00:02:35.560 --> 00:02:37.759 So there's a kind of a lot of people on both sides of the 35 00:02:37.800 --> 00:02:42.759 aisle saying yes or no, and those are what posts usually do well. 36 00:02:43.280 --> 00:02:46.039 James, you actually approached this topic a while ago, even just a few 37 00:02:46.039 --> 00:02:51.080 weeks ago talking to me about it. What triggered in your mind when you 38 00:02:51.159 --> 00:02:58.120 first thought about changing marketing titles over to media titles. Yeah, so as 39 00:02:58.159 --> 00:03:02.199 of a few weeks ago, we really made the decision that our marketing that 40 00:03:02.280 --> 00:03:07.479 sweet Fish is marketing would become we were putting all of our chips into B 41 00:03:07.479 --> 00:03:13.319 two B growth and so having Benji, Emily and you all focused on B 42 00:03:13.360 --> 00:03:17.800 two B growth and that was really our marketing spent was are we growing B 43 00:03:17.879 --> 00:03:23.159 two B growth? Are we tying the business objectives of the company to the 44 00:03:23.240 --> 00:03:29.560 results of BtoB growth? Is BDB growth tangibly doing the work that it needs 45 00:03:29.599 --> 00:03:32.680 to do to actually drive revenue for Sweet Fish? Now we're starting more and 46 00:03:32.719 --> 00:03:38.360 more to think about like monetizing B two B growth as a standalone asset. 47 00:03:38.439 --> 00:03:44.199 So because knowing that affinity takes time to convert to revenue, but affinity is 48 00:03:44.240 --> 00:03:49.000 absolutely the best path toward revenue. It doesn't show up on a spreadsheet quickly, 49 00:03:49.520 --> 00:03:53.240 and even when it does convert to revenue, it's sometimes often hard to 50 00:03:53.120 --> 00:03:59.000 attribute it to the work you did with the media brand, because the media 51 00:03:59.039 --> 00:04:00.680 brand is kind of the tip of spear, and it's how somebody starts to 52 00:04:00.719 --> 00:04:05.159 get acclimated to your ecosystem in your world. But then it could be a 53 00:04:05.159 --> 00:04:09.879 blog post that they read three weeks after getting introduced to the show that really 54 00:04:09.960 --> 00:04:12.680 put them over the top. Or it could be a conversation that they had 55 00:04:12.759 --> 00:04:15.399 with somebody one of our people on LinkedIn, so they attributed it to LinkedIn 56 00:04:15.480 --> 00:04:19.000 instead of it being attributed to they found B TWOB growth first. And so 57 00:04:19.600 --> 00:04:26.240 I think the more I've thought about our own marketing being really dumped into B 58 00:04:26.319 --> 00:04:30.040 two B growth, the more I thought, and this is how modern marketing 59 00:04:30.519 --> 00:04:34.480 is going to work. I think traditionally you've had a lot of marketers that 60 00:04:34.480 --> 00:04:40.240 have focused on funnels and focused on conversion metrics, and I think that is 61 00:04:40.279 --> 00:04:44.759 still needed. This post wasn't intended to say that everything that the VP of 62 00:04:44.800 --> 00:04:48.319 marketing was doing before isn't necessary. And I think some people kind of took 63 00:04:48.319 --> 00:04:53.040 it that way by saying, Okay, is this just the next fad? 64 00:04:53.399 --> 00:04:57.240 Is this just us kind of giving marketing another name yet again. I think 65 00:04:57.319 --> 00:05:00.160 there's certainly some tiredness to that, with all the talk around strategic narrative, 66 00:05:00.199 --> 00:05:05.399 old game, new game, category creation. I think marketers in particularly are 67 00:05:05.399 --> 00:05:09.199 getting a little bit iy rolly about that stuff because it's like, Okay, 68 00:05:09.240 --> 00:05:13.560 sure, tell me that marketing is completely changed yet again. But I think 69 00:05:13.639 --> 00:05:18.600 that this approach to marketing really focusing on the media is actually what content marketing 70 00:05:18.639 --> 00:05:23.519 intended to do. I think when you look at Joe Politici and what he 71 00:05:23.600 --> 00:05:29.240 intended to build whenever he built the content marketing category was that you would put 72 00:05:29.279 --> 00:05:33.079 so much effort into the content and making the content so good that it would 73 00:05:33.120 --> 00:05:36.800 give you that a rational bias, It would give someone that affinity towards your 74 00:05:36.839 --> 00:05:42.800 brand. But I think a lot of marketers kind of bastardized that, and 75 00:05:43.240 --> 00:05:46.399 not always because being their own fault, because they've got senior executives that are 76 00:05:46.439 --> 00:05:50.319 breathing down their their neck about needing m q L s and and needing to 77 00:05:50.399 --> 00:05:55.800 justify what we're doing with this quote unquote content marketing thing. We need revenue, 78 00:05:56.279 --> 00:06:00.720 and so content marketing started to resemble more and more product marketing. It's 79 00:06:00.759 --> 00:06:02.560 just like, how can we figure out how to talk about our product in 80 00:06:02.600 --> 00:06:08.279 a disguised way? And this is really a retreat from that and saying no, 81 00:06:08.399 --> 00:06:12.680 let's go back to the original intent of what content marketing should be. 82 00:06:13.279 --> 00:06:15.360 And do we name it something different? I don't know, but one of 83 00:06:15.399 --> 00:06:19.639 the things that I'm thinking about is like starts by roll definition and if you're 84 00:06:19.639 --> 00:06:25.680 going to treat a media property differently than how we've traditionally been treating content marketing, 85 00:06:25.800 --> 00:06:29.800 it's way more than just blog posts that rank for keywords. It's funny 86 00:06:30.079 --> 00:06:35.199 the original I remember watching um that content marketing documentary. Right, it's a 87 00:06:35.959 --> 00:06:39.879 if you haven't seen it, like just google content marketing documentary. It's a 88 00:06:39.920 --> 00:06:43.079 great little video about like the origin of it, and it goes all the 89 00:06:43.120 --> 00:06:46.480 way back to like John Deere rolling out their magazine The Furrow. Right, 90 00:06:47.120 --> 00:06:50.680 it's over a hundred years old, and they weren't even talking about John Deer 91 00:06:50.720 --> 00:06:55.199 detractors they were, or good equipment. They were just talking about stuff farmers 92 00:06:55.240 --> 00:06:59.079 found relatively useful they knew, like John Deere put it out, but it 93 00:06:59.199 --> 00:07:01.600 wasn't a product thing. It was a media brand. It was a magazine 94 00:07:01.639 --> 00:07:05.160 in and of itself. And that's ultimately where we want to bring it back. 95 00:07:05.160 --> 00:07:09.240 And I think you're right in that it's a lot of content marketing has 96 00:07:09.279 --> 00:07:12.360 become product marketing. But even when it's not, even when it's a how 97 00:07:12.399 --> 00:07:15.959 to list that's broader than the product that they sell, it still has this 98 00:07:16.240 --> 00:07:21.639 flavor of marketing in it, right. It still has marketing in its goal, 99 00:07:21.680 --> 00:07:26.920 and you can feel it by the five pop ups that jump out. 100 00:07:27.160 --> 00:07:30.399 You know, it's kind of like and it's on the company blog and it's 101 00:07:30.399 --> 00:07:34.240 branded across the top and a big footer, and it's written by somebody who's 102 00:07:34.279 --> 00:07:38.920 not actually a subject matter expert and what the customer cares about. It's written 103 00:07:38.920 --> 00:07:42.920 by a content person that the company hired to put this out so that they 104 00:07:42.959 --> 00:07:46.560 could get traffic to their website. And the whole thing has a flavor to 105 00:07:46.639 --> 00:07:50.720 it that just feels like marketing, right, and it's not even as helpful 106 00:07:50.720 --> 00:07:54.839 as it needs to be. So I think by repositioning it a little bit 107 00:07:54.920 --> 00:07:57.240 is actually useful, and that's our take on it. Of course, some 108 00:07:57.279 --> 00:08:01.199 people there's always, like you said, I rolls when you trying to change 109 00:08:01.240 --> 00:08:03.639 the way people talk about things. Because marketers are good at that, we 110 00:08:03.680 --> 00:08:07.920 do it a lot um, sometimes more successful in others. Some of the 111 00:08:07.920 --> 00:08:11.480 pushback that I've heard in other posts whenever I talk about companies needing to become 112 00:08:11.480 --> 00:08:15.600 media companies. One of the guys I'm thinking of right now is I think 113 00:08:15.600 --> 00:08:18.879 a friend of yours Dan, But he's basically pushing back on that because media 114 00:08:18.920 --> 00:08:24.160 companies are a really hard business model, like creating content that is so good 115 00:08:24.199 --> 00:08:31.120 that other companies trying to reach your target audience are willing to pay you to 116 00:08:31.240 --> 00:08:35.879 get talked about or to get in front of the exact people that your content 117 00:08:35.279 --> 00:08:39.919 reaches because of how good it is. And so the investment that you have 118 00:08:41.000 --> 00:08:45.200 to make in making that content and then what you can actually sell in terms 119 00:08:45.200 --> 00:08:48.960 of what people are willing to pay to get in front of that audience, 120 00:08:48.440 --> 00:08:52.600 that business model is. It can be very challenging, but I think it's 121 00:08:52.600 --> 00:08:56.000 actually helpful at least since we've started having these conversations with B two B growth 122 00:08:56.039 --> 00:08:58.720 and thinking about how we can start doing this for our client shows. I 123 00:08:58.799 --> 00:09:03.639 think gets actually helpful to think about how can you monetize the media itself, 124 00:09:03.679 --> 00:09:07.519 because it's a forcing function for you to make sure that that content is good 125 00:09:07.600 --> 00:09:11.759 in and of itself. Curious to get your thoughts. Do you think that 126 00:09:11.759 --> 00:09:18.360 that departure of trying to tie your media brand directly to revenue is like do 127 00:09:18.399 --> 00:09:20.480 you think I've swung too far the other way and trying to make the media 128 00:09:20.519 --> 00:09:26.360 brand pay for itself? No? No, I think that should be everybody's 129 00:09:26.399 --> 00:09:30.960 goal. Not everybody will get there, and that's okay because it will still 130 00:09:30.960 --> 00:09:35.480 work and generate revenue for your business. But if you can make it big 131 00:09:35.600 --> 00:09:39.039 enough and attractive enough for other people to sponsor and essentially create like a perpetual 132 00:09:39.759 --> 00:09:43.759 marketing machine, I think of like perpetual emotion. I'm a nerd. I 133 00:09:43.159 --> 00:09:48.480 love studying how people have made perpetual emotion machines, and even though it's technically 134 00:09:48.519 --> 00:09:50.440 like impossible, right, but still, I just love the idea of it 135 00:09:50.480 --> 00:09:54.159 in physics, of something that just never stops. I'm like, man, 136 00:09:54.200 --> 00:09:58.759 I want that in marketing. It's also impossible marketing for the long term, 137 00:09:58.840 --> 00:10:01.200 like eventually like you have to put massive effort or things into it to make 138 00:10:01.240 --> 00:10:03.799 it go again. But like, if I can get it to the point 139 00:10:03.799 --> 00:10:09.919 where a marketing channel that's making revenue for my company pays for itself, I 140 00:10:09.919 --> 00:10:13.279 want to call out a few things here, Dan some comments that popped up 141 00:10:13.279 --> 00:10:18.519 on this post. One was really really encouraging to me from Tyler Lossard, 142 00:10:18.600 --> 00:10:24.039 who, in my opinion, might be executing this whole media brand strategy that 143 00:10:24.080 --> 00:10:28.320 we're advocating for better than anyone and B two B right now through a media 144 00:10:28.360 --> 00:10:33.879 brand called sales Feed. Now, Tyler Lessard is the CMO of Vidyard, 145 00:10:35.039 --> 00:10:39.720 so like a video email platform, and they've created a separate media brand called 146 00:10:39.759 --> 00:10:43.799 sales Feed. They've staffed it with I thinks Will Aikin was actually a sales 147 00:10:43.879 --> 00:10:48.000 influencer and so his comment on the post was, Oh my gosh, I've 148 00:10:48.000 --> 00:10:52.240 been trying to figure out how to articulate the evolution of my role and this 149 00:10:52.320 --> 00:10:56.879 is it off to update my LinkedIn profile. Another comment my friend Obed Dorani. 150 00:10:58.120 --> 00:11:00.879 He said, easy dream job, Where do I sign up? Oh? 151 00:11:00.919 --> 00:11:03.480 Oh? Bet is the living embodiment of thinking about content this way? 152 00:11:03.600 --> 00:11:09.120 Him him, Todd Klausser Emily Brady, you know, from our team, 153 00:11:09.200 --> 00:11:11.600 is kind of in that crew. They hang out with Will Aching a lot 154 00:11:11.639 --> 00:11:15.840 too, so they're living and breathing this. There was one comment here from 155 00:11:15.960 --> 00:11:20.080 David Uraguay. He said, it sounds about right to me. Head of 156 00:11:20.120 --> 00:11:24.600 brand strategy times head of product marketing equals modern VP of marketing. I struggle 157 00:11:26.080 --> 00:11:31.320 with that common a little bit in terms of like brand strategy times head of 158 00:11:31.399 --> 00:11:35.759 product marketing, that's a lot of product marketing in the mix there. I 159 00:11:35.759 --> 00:11:39.159 mean, you're basically just saying it's a combo of brand strategy and product marketing. 160 00:11:39.440 --> 00:11:43.440 I think the product marketing has to be lesser. I think that's the 161 00:11:43.480 --> 00:11:48.399 mistake we've made traditionally, is making product marketing too much a part of the 162 00:11:48.440 --> 00:11:52.639 media brand, and it ends up breaking trust with the audience because people can 163 00:11:52.679 --> 00:11:56.279 see that, oh, you're just really trying to sling a product, and 164 00:11:56.360 --> 00:12:00.360 I think there's a line there. You don't want to pretend to become copletely 165 00:12:00.399 --> 00:12:03.919 unbiased. We talk on Sweet Fish a lot about how like we're not mother 166 00:12:03.039 --> 00:12:09.159 Teresa, We're not just doing this because we've got this altruistic heart to try 167 00:12:09.159 --> 00:12:11.720 to help marketers get better at their job. No, we know that if 168 00:12:11.720 --> 00:12:16.240 we help marketers create an unfair advantage in their work, then that affinity towards 169 00:12:16.240 --> 00:12:18.960 sweet Fish is going to result in dollars for our business. And so that's 170 00:12:20.000 --> 00:12:24.519 my one issue with that comment from David is a man. Maybe it's brand 171 00:12:24.600 --> 00:12:31.279 strategy, it's strategic editorial meets you know, a light version. Maybe it's 172 00:12:31.679 --> 00:12:35.600 head of product marketing divided by two would be the closer to the equation that 173 00:12:35.679 --> 00:12:39.720 I'm thinking of there. And then another comment from Asher Matthew. He says, 174 00:12:39.799 --> 00:12:43.840 is this another case of what's old is new? Was this true for 175 00:12:43.960 --> 00:12:46.320 vps of marketing before demand gen became such a focus for them? I think 176 00:12:46.320 --> 00:12:52.440 the way I responded to Asher's comment was, I actually think that by executing 177 00:12:52.480 --> 00:12:58.600 a media brand strategy, well, I think it's still demand gen, but 178 00:12:58.080 --> 00:13:03.440 it is. I think you first got to create demand for your media, 179 00:13:03.720 --> 00:13:09.919 and then once you've created a raving desire for your media, then it expedites 180 00:13:09.960 --> 00:13:13.200 the effectiveness of the demand that you're going to create for your product when you 181 00:13:13.360 --> 00:13:18.279 do strategically figure out how to integrate your product into that media. What are 182 00:13:18.279 --> 00:13:22.639 your thoughts there, Dan, I think you're writing that you're setting up a 183 00:13:22.679 --> 00:13:26.480 separate brand. It is a separate brand, Should it tie it nicely to 184 00:13:26.519 --> 00:13:28.399 your other brand? Yes, but it doesn't even need to be like a 185 00:13:28.440 --> 00:13:33.080 sub brand necessarily of your brand and like creatively all fit together a nice package. 186 00:13:33.080 --> 00:13:37.279 You can just needs to be a separate brand to create separations so you 187 00:13:37.320 --> 00:13:41.240 can position it differently than your other brand. Right, the positioning on these 188 00:13:41.279 --> 00:13:43.440 two things are probably going to be different once. Probably your media brand is 189 00:13:43.440 --> 00:13:46.960 gonna be broader, right because you should have tooken a niche positioning within whatever 190 00:13:48.000 --> 00:13:50.039 industry you're playing in. Yours is going to be brought. The media brand 191 00:13:50.039 --> 00:13:56.600 is gonna be all encompassing for everything your buyers love. So you're actually creating 192 00:13:56.639 --> 00:14:00.639 marketing for your media and treating it like its own little mini copenny within your 193 00:14:00.639 --> 00:14:03.240 company. And I think you can do that with just a few employees, 194 00:14:03.279 --> 00:14:07.759 like it doesn't take a huge media team. That's the other pushback we got 195 00:14:07.799 --> 00:14:09.039 is, oh, this is too expensive. It's too expensive. I don't 196 00:14:09.039 --> 00:14:11.360 think it needs to be. I mean, we're executing this with B two 197 00:14:11.360 --> 00:14:16.240 B growth, with a three person team. We're gonna wind this one down. 198 00:14:16.759 --> 00:14:18.960 But I love having these conversations I love kind of giving a peek behind 199 00:14:18.960 --> 00:14:22.919 the curtain of how we're thinking about this at sweet Fish and how B TWOB 200 00:14:24.000 --> 00:14:28.720 growth is playing into too our company strategy. It's not just this kind of 201 00:14:28.759 --> 00:14:31.679 side piece that so many companies look at their podcast. It's just like this 202 00:14:31.720 --> 00:14:35.559 little tactical thing over on the side. Now, this is central to our 203 00:14:35.600 --> 00:14:39.000 company's growth strategy, and I think that should be how other marketing leaders are 204 00:14:39.039 --> 00:14:43.240 looking at their media brand as well. So thank you all so much for 205 00:14:43.279 --> 00:14:46.679 listening. Um Dan, thanks for jumping on here and talking through this. 206 00:14:48.360 --> 00:14:50.759 That's it for today's episode of the Journey. Remember there are a lot of 207 00:14:50.879 --> 00:14:56.360 ways to win in B two B marketing, but commodity content is the enemy. 208 00:14:56.639 --> 00:15:01.120 Focus on affinity over awareness. Don't just be this able, be memorable 209 00:15:01.200 --> 00:15:05.559 for all things GDP growth. Visit GDP Growth Show dot com and connect with 210 00:15:05.639 --> 00:15:07.440 us over on LinkedIn. We're out.