Every Friday we share one non-obvious insight from your favorite creators in our newsletter.
June 5, 2021

Steps for Thought Leadership with Huge or Tiny Budgets

The player is loading ...
B2B Growth

In this episode, Dan Sanchez talked to Matthijs Van den Broek who is the head of Thought Leadership for WUA about what thought leadership can look like on a tiny or massive budget.

They discuss:

  • Matthijs' experience creating thought leadership for WUA for 5+ years
  • What he would do if he had to start over from scratch at a small company
  • What he would do if his boss 10x his budget
Transcript
WEBVTT 1 00:00:02.540 --> 00:00:02.740 Yeah, 2 00:00:05.540 --> 00:00:09.870 welcome back to BBB growth, I'm dan Sanchez, friends call me dan says and 3 00:00:09.870 --> 00:00:13.950 I'm here with Matthew Van den broek, who is the head of Thought Leadership 4 00:00:13.950 --> 00:00:19.150 at Woah and today I'm continuing the journey into the topic of Thought 5 00:00:19.160 --> 00:00:22.700 leadership marketing. If you're just joining us in this deep dive we're 6 00:00:22.700 --> 00:00:26.140 doing in the month of june today then just know that I've, if you haven't 7 00:00:26.140 --> 00:00:29.080 been following me to be growth for a while, it's like I've been fascinated 8 00:00:29.080 --> 00:00:32.409 with this idea of thought leadership and I've been waiting just to do a deep 9 00:00:32.409 --> 00:00:37.510 dive on an interview practitioners, interview vendors, interview experts 10 00:00:37.510 --> 00:00:40.720 and interview actual thought leaders as well as probably give a few thoughts of 11 00:00:40.720 --> 00:00:45.620 my own along the way. I think this topic is very divisive, People don't 12 00:00:45.630 --> 00:00:48.970 like this topic sometimes, but a lot of people are still looking for it are 13 00:00:48.970 --> 00:00:51.930 still asking about it and that's because honestly I find that thought 14 00:00:51.930 --> 00:00:56.180 leadership is really important. It really works especially And AB two B 15 00:00:56.190 --> 00:01:00.460 context. Yet there's a lot of people who would say that thought leadership 16 00:01:00.460 --> 00:01:03.550 isn't even a thing that it's really just expertise that it's just a 17 00:01:03.550 --> 00:01:07.100 buzzword and I'm trying to do this thought leadership journey to really 18 00:01:07.110 --> 00:01:10.420 unpack that to dig into it. I think it's more than that and I think it's 19 00:01:10.420 --> 00:01:14.260 really powerful. So actually today I'm talking to Matthew who's been in it for 20 00:01:14.260 --> 00:01:19.550 five years at his company, Being full time thought leadership marketer, he's 21 00:01:19.550 --> 00:01:23.010 been doing it, he's not necessarily even like the subject matter expert but 22 00:01:23.010 --> 00:01:27.570 he's responsible for making sure he's positioning his company as a thought 23 00:01:27.570 --> 00:01:32.670 leader in this space of I believe digital is a digital communication 24 00:01:32.670 --> 00:01:36.740 benchmarking, Matthew digital experiences that, right, so it's 25 00:01:36.740 --> 00:01:40.910 digital experience, it'll experienced benchmarking which is fascinating, 26 00:01:40.920 --> 00:01:45.160 could be its own show in itself. But today we're here to just talk about 27 00:01:45.160 --> 00:01:49.700 thought leadership. So Matthew, welcome to the show. Thanks for having me then. 28 00:01:49.860 --> 00:01:54.490 Much appreciate it. Absolutely. I was just talking to him about what we're 29 00:01:54.490 --> 00:01:59.200 gonna be talking about in this interview and what I stumbled upon, 30 00:01:59.200 --> 00:02:03.340 what I'm fascinated to kind of unpack is what being five years into this 31 00:02:03.340 --> 00:02:08.199 position or for over five years and I'm curious to hear what Matthew would do 32 00:02:08.210 --> 00:02:12.250 if he had almost no budget and was starting over from scratch as well as 33 00:02:12.250 --> 00:02:16.980 like if it was times of plenty and he was, if Ceo walked into his office and 34 00:02:16.980 --> 00:02:22.180 been like Matthew I'm going to 10 x your budget, give us the best bang for 35 00:02:22.180 --> 00:02:25.570 our buck as far as thought leadership is just concerned because it's working 36 00:02:25.570 --> 00:02:29.770 and I want 10 times more maybe they had just landed around a VC funding and 37 00:02:29.770 --> 00:02:33.650 knew that this was the route they wanted to go, what would that look like. 38 00:02:33.660 --> 00:02:37.390 So, but let's start off on the small end Matthew, if you were starting over 39 00:02:37.390 --> 00:02:41.750 at a small, maybe tech tech company and you were tasked with creating thought 40 00:02:41.750 --> 00:02:45.210 leadership for them company, I'd be interested to hear what would be some 41 00:02:45.210 --> 00:02:48.960 of the first couple of steps you would take in order order to get that started. 42 00:02:49.340 --> 00:02:54.330 Yeah. So I would definitely, if you, if you have to start small and have 43 00:02:54.330 --> 00:02:58.890 limited budget, you definitely start by looking around what, what's already 44 00:02:58.890 --> 00:03:03.260 there. So the human capital that is already within the organization and 45 00:03:03.270 --> 00:03:09.020 that you might want to unlock and that's also how I am, how I started at 46 00:03:09.070 --> 00:03:14.280 you are we just take a look at the data and all the research that we already 47 00:03:14.280 --> 00:03:19.210 provide and see what stories are already there and unleash those stories 48 00:03:19.210 --> 00:03:27.580 to uh, the most relevant public that we that we could find. So I think if you 49 00:03:27.580 --> 00:03:31.600 want to start small and you have limited budgets, you'll you'll start to 50 00:03:31.600 --> 00:03:37.150 see what what people already can do. So you see the talent, the talent that 51 00:03:37.160 --> 00:03:43.260 with the people who are on the, on the payroll and you could definitely 52 00:03:43.270 --> 00:03:51.020 organize events or webinars or or small knowledge platforms or communities on 53 00:03:51.030 --> 00:03:56.040 on linkedin. There's so much out there that is free to go. But I think 54 00:03:56.050 --> 00:04:01.440 critical success factories, do you have compelling and relevant content that 55 00:04:01.440 --> 00:04:08.870 people want to read or listen or watch? And that's where uh in my opinion, a 56 00:04:08.880 --> 00:04:14.100 great story and and good content marketing. Start it starts it all 57 00:04:14.100 --> 00:04:18.970 starts with great content and then uh the distribution phase and the scaling 58 00:04:18.970 --> 00:04:24.630 up phase and the frequency phase of your of your most interesting articles. 59 00:04:24.640 --> 00:04:29.080 That's step two or step three or step four. That makes a lot of sense. So 60 00:04:29.080 --> 00:04:32.030 essentially you kind of go and do like an audit of the organization. You find 61 00:04:32.030 --> 00:04:34.980 out what content is already been written that just hasn't maybe gotten 62 00:04:34.980 --> 00:04:38.700 enough exposure yet. What subject matter experts do we already have 63 00:04:38.710 --> 00:04:42.480 access to if we're going to be creating thought leadership content. I'm curious 64 00:04:42.480 --> 00:04:47.120 to hear. Like is there a step you take before you go do that? But did you even 65 00:04:47.120 --> 00:04:51.410 find out like what the markets hungry for? Um, what customers are asking 66 00:04:51.410 --> 00:04:55.890 about or what, what's considered even thought leadership in that particular 67 00:04:55.890 --> 00:05:01.060 industry? If you're not a subject matter expert yet, it would be smart to, 68 00:05:01.070 --> 00:05:06.900 to start with. I think it would be starting to start with buyer personas. 69 00:05:06.910 --> 00:05:13.470 So who are my customers and uh, what people will I be doing business with? 70 00:05:13.480 --> 00:05:19.990 And what kind of or types of content are they looking for? And we did that 71 00:05:20.000 --> 00:05:27.970 like uh with the revamp of our website in January 2019, we decided to aim more 72 00:05:27.980 --> 00:05:32.690 on on the buyer personas so that sea level and it's marketeers, that's also 73 00:05:32.690 --> 00:05:38.370 market researchers, it's you exercise. And it's also the web analytics uh kind 74 00:05:38.370 --> 00:05:44.300 of guys at this moment and girls of course. So that would be uh smart to to 75 00:05:44.300 --> 00:05:50.640 talk to your sales people or people who have a lot of customer contact. So how 76 00:05:50.640 --> 00:05:54.880 do how do you buy a personas look like? And what types of content are they 77 00:05:54.880 --> 00:05:59.900 interested in? So serve the right target audience with the right with the 78 00:05:59.900 --> 00:06:05.950 right message. That would be a good start when you when you want to craft 79 00:06:06.040 --> 00:06:10.820 For leadership program. And if you wanna, especially in B2B, you might 80 00:06:10.820 --> 00:06:15.650 want to have, you might have not won just one stakeholder, but multiple 81 00:06:15.650 --> 00:06:22.290 stakeholders before uh the seal the deal is done, and you want to convince 82 00:06:22.300 --> 00:06:26.360 all those stakeholders that you're the relevant company and with the right 83 00:06:26.360 --> 00:06:32.950 tools to work with. So I think that that would be smart to do to diversify 84 00:06:32.950 --> 00:06:39.940 your your content before you start, uh publishing it makes a lot of sense. So 85 00:06:39.940 --> 00:06:45.660 essentially we do a little bit of work, we established the personas, figure out 86 00:06:45.660 --> 00:06:49.000 what kinds of questions are asking, figure out what are the essentially, I 87 00:06:49.000 --> 00:06:51.310 guess what thought leadership, you're really looking for gaps in the 88 00:06:51.310 --> 00:06:55.140 knowledge, right? Because it's not your thought leadership is usually a new 89 00:06:55.140 --> 00:06:58.060 idea, something that's pushing forward the boundaries that haven't existed 90 00:06:58.060 --> 00:07:02.120 before. Um So you're looking for gaps, you're looking for what's relevant to 91 00:07:02.120 --> 00:07:07.200 the customers and then um doing inventory of the company, establishing 92 00:07:07.200 --> 00:07:10.860 what pieces are we already providing. Because you don't want to have to 93 00:07:10.860 --> 00:07:14.580 reinvent the wheel and then getting, do you like try to repackage those who 94 00:07:14.580 --> 00:07:17.880 just get them in front of people in different ways before you start 95 00:07:17.880 --> 00:07:23.490 creating new content? How does that work well if you were packaging? Yes. 96 00:07:23.490 --> 00:07:29.100 In a way. But the business we're into is is so customer experience 97 00:07:29.100 --> 00:07:35.040 benchmarking. It means we uh we compare sales funnels and we benchmark sales 98 00:07:35.040 --> 00:07:41.740 funnels and we tell our clients what is the best the best sales for. Not there 99 00:07:41.750 --> 00:07:46.090 are the best customer journey there and what you can learn from your 100 00:07:46.090 --> 00:07:51.600 competitors in a way. So it's a it's a kind of a mystery shopping on steroids, 101 00:07:51.600 --> 00:07:57.670 what we what we do and digital and strategic decisions on on on budgets 102 00:07:57.680 --> 00:08:05.470 are made by sometimes by sea level, but C. Level people are more more into the 103 00:08:05.480 --> 00:08:12.250 strategic questions. And I want to have a management summer we've with clear 104 00:08:12.250 --> 00:08:19.350 KPs. But the market researcher uh they want that the research is done in a 105 00:08:19.360 --> 00:08:24.660 proper way that it's uh that it's valid that it's trustworthy. It is repetitive 106 00:08:24.670 --> 00:08:31.920 and that the outcomes are just clear and and sure, so other uh we we we have 107 00:08:31.920 --> 00:08:36.860 a product that is suitable for all layers who are working with Digital 108 00:08:36.860 --> 00:08:40.770 within the organization, but they're looking at other aspects of our 109 00:08:40.770 --> 00:08:46.610 products. So we created in the past, we created uh storylines about digital 110 00:08:46.610 --> 00:08:51.070 excellence and the digital excellence part really for the for the C. Level, 111 00:08:51.080 --> 00:08:58.380 people who are looking at Digital at a more strategic in a more strategic way. 112 00:08:58.390 --> 00:09:04.110 And they just they want to have the KPs go up and I wanna see an uplift in uh 113 00:09:04.120 --> 00:09:09.860 in online sales volumes. But how you how the product works and how you how 114 00:09:09.860 --> 00:09:15.290 you can make a deep dive into what customers are saying about your website 115 00:09:15.300 --> 00:09:20.330 uh compared to the competition. That's not not directly relevant for those 116 00:09:20.340 --> 00:09:24.950 people. And if you know that, then you can craft your message in in another 117 00:09:24.950 --> 00:09:31.850 way. And yes, that also means that uh sometimes you recycle content a bit 118 00:09:32.140 --> 00:09:41.810 because the message for the C. Level people is also aspiring for the people 119 00:09:41.810 --> 00:09:50.510 working under the those uh sea level or our management boards. So definitely 120 00:09:50.520 --> 00:09:57.170 it's good to see what's already there. And also recycle it a bit. But you 121 00:09:57.170 --> 00:10:01.750 don't want to copy paste too much because then if you copy paste too much, 122 00:10:01.760 --> 00:10:08.080 then you get not the SEO ranks and the find ability that you that you want to 123 00:10:08.080 --> 00:10:16.010 have. So it's also a threat to uh to recycle too much, I think. Yeah, I do 124 00:10:16.010 --> 00:10:19.280 like, I mean, I like recycling contents. I find that people need to hear things 125 00:10:19.280 --> 00:10:22.620 over and over and over and over again before it sinks in, right? Especially 126 00:10:22.620 --> 00:10:27.200 if you have a really powerful concept. Yeah, but again, you have to mix it up 127 00:10:27.200 --> 00:10:30.610 a little bit, you know? So I love it that you have all this research to pull 128 00:10:30.610 --> 00:10:33.850 from. Now. I'm curious to know like how do you repackage it? What's your 129 00:10:33.850 --> 00:10:37.820 favorite, like, especially if you're in a low budget situation, do you try to 130 00:10:37.820 --> 00:10:42.500 get it into writing? Do you try to get it into video form? Infographic? Like 131 00:10:42.500 --> 00:10:47.050 what's kind of like your favorite medium to go with? Just to start, wow, 132 00:10:47.640 --> 00:10:52.650 We're based in Amsterdam. So we're a Dutch company founded by Dutch cheese. 133 00:10:52.660 --> 00:10:59.600 So my my favorite recycling is translation, so I can publish the 134 00:10:59.600 --> 00:11:05.980 original content within the Dutch language area, that's not, not too too 135 00:11:05.980 --> 00:11:10.860 big, but we're talking about 20 million people or something or maybe a bit more. 136 00:11:10.940 --> 00:11:20.260 So if I translated to uh us English, then i it cost me uh some, but not not 137 00:11:20.260 --> 00:11:27.310 that many, and I have an original content in my head, um it's, of course, 138 00:11:27.320 --> 00:11:34.440 of course it's exactly the same, but it delivers me directly a broader, broader 139 00:11:34.440 --> 00:11:39.250 audience. And it also means that I can can recycle it and have the double 140 00:11:39.250 --> 00:11:44.980 amount of use just by translating it. So that's the most, most easy part of 141 00:11:44.990 --> 00:11:51.430 content recycling and reusing a content from my perspective. The other way is 142 00:11:51.440 --> 00:11:58.180 what we, but we also uh did the first steps is we have a podcast since half 143 00:11:58.180 --> 00:12:04.970 year, or uh we did now nine episodes. And what I'm also trying to do is uh 144 00:12:04.980 --> 00:12:10.920 get the most important and most interesting parts per topic out of the 145 00:12:10.930 --> 00:12:17.240 podcast and create white papers out of out of bed. And that's what I I tried 146 00:12:17.240 --> 00:12:23.590 that with with external writer. His ideas were really good, but I had to I 147 00:12:23.600 --> 00:12:27.150 still have to follow up on that on that project. But it's also really 148 00:12:27.150 --> 00:12:34.100 interesting because he proposed to add if there's any new episode on your 149 00:12:34.100 --> 00:12:41.160 podcast To also renew the white papers and publish it when it's like seven or 150 00:12:41.170 --> 00:12:47.980 8 or nine pages long. And that's really interesting from from recycling 151 00:12:47.990 --> 00:12:52.660 perspective because it just it's it's a it's a machine, it just keeps on 152 00:12:52.660 --> 00:12:57.990 feeding with new new pieces of original content and I think original content 153 00:12:58.000 --> 00:13:04.360 and original ideas, be it that you have derived those original ideas from front 154 00:13:04.360 --> 00:13:08.640 runners in the digital industry. So persons or people you interview, just 155 00:13:08.640 --> 00:13:12.740 like we're doing now, that doesn't matter, That is what counts when you're 156 00:13:12.740 --> 00:13:18.120 we're talking about for leadership. So that's also really interesting. Uh and 157 00:13:18.120 --> 00:13:25.160 we also once created a book that we did, it did the interviews in Dutch, and I 158 00:13:25.170 --> 00:13:31.810 translated the whole book to uh to english, and uh we printed it in 2.5 159 00:13:31.810 --> 00:13:37.950 1000 copies, but we also uh had it available for download in english on 160 00:13:37.950 --> 00:13:43.420 our website. So it's also created a lot of, a lot of leads, so that's also a 161 00:13:43.420 --> 00:13:48.400 way of uh of content recycling and distribution and getting it together 162 00:13:48.400 --> 00:13:54.380 and then ripping it apart again. So yeah, sometimes the smaller pieces of 163 00:13:54.380 --> 00:13:58.490 content add up to a bigger to a bigger piece of content, and it can be a white 164 00:13:58.490 --> 00:14:03.880 paper or a book or or an event or seminar man, that's fascinating idea. 165 00:14:03.890 --> 00:14:07.750 Taking smaller pieces to make a bigger piece. We usually do the opposite here 166 00:14:07.750 --> 00:14:10.770 sweet fish by taking a bigger piece, like a longer interview like this one 167 00:14:10.770 --> 00:14:13.800 and then break it up into a bunch of smaller pieces. But I can definitely 168 00:14:13.800 --> 00:14:16.940 see reverse engineering and going the other way. Yeah, that's actually 169 00:14:16.940 --> 00:14:21.250 something I'm thinking about doing this series is turning not a lot, I've done 170 00:14:21.250 --> 00:14:24.590 a lot of original research myself, but taking parts of these interviews and 171 00:14:24.590 --> 00:14:27.620 turning it into a book that we created as a sweet Fish playbook for thought 172 00:14:27.620 --> 00:14:30.610 leadership. But I'm already thinking along those lines and I think you 173 00:14:30.610 --> 00:14:34.520 shared this idea with me even last time we talked way back in the fall, they 174 00:14:34.520 --> 00:14:39.160 kind of circle back around though too, picking channels to publish your 175 00:14:39.540 --> 00:14:42.840 thought leadership in. It sounds like you're mostly going with written 176 00:14:42.840 --> 00:14:46.750 content because it's easier to like turn written content into different 177 00:14:46.750 --> 00:14:51.240 languages and then sometimes the audio content as a next next step for your, 178 00:14:51.250 --> 00:14:54.940 your channels. Um, I'd be curious to know like if you're, if you're 179 00:14:54.940 --> 00:14:58.100 translating a lot of the written content, are you also translating audio 180 00:14:58.100 --> 00:15:01.130 content? Like what language are you recording in? And then are you posting 181 00:15:01.130 --> 00:15:04.600 two episodes, one for different like or three episodes one for different 182 00:15:04.600 --> 00:15:09.060 languages? Like how are you handling language when it comes to podcast? Yeah, 183 00:15:09.070 --> 00:15:14.070 So we don't subtitle the podcast. What we do now is just recorded in english 184 00:15:14.070 --> 00:15:19.710 and that's it. We do it for the videos we published on linkedin. So when a new 185 00:15:19.710 --> 00:15:25.740 study comes out, we, we present the study findings in a, in a dashboard and 186 00:15:25.740 --> 00:15:31.990 we present the high level findings of those of those study results in a short, 187 00:15:32.000 --> 00:15:36.710 uh, well a bit long at this moment, but we're trying to bring it back in in 188 00:15:36.710 --> 00:15:43.050 time, video on, on Lincoln. And we subtitled, uh, sometimes it's the, it's 189 00:15:43.050 --> 00:15:48.920 the languages in dutch and then we subtitle it in a translation in, in 190 00:15:48.920 --> 00:15:55.240 english. But what we try to do most of the times is to directly record the 191 00:15:55.250 --> 00:15:59.900 video in uh, in english and then have it subtitled also in english, so that 192 00:15:59.900 --> 00:16:06.660 people also can read uh, and don't have to plug in the any, uh, any airports or 193 00:16:06.660 --> 00:16:13.160 something. We didn't reverse the audio from english to, to touch because 194 00:16:13.540 --> 00:16:20.090 that's a lot of effort for a smaller language language area and I can, I can 195 00:16:20.090 --> 00:16:23.990 only make sense. I've had people ask me about it and I'm like, I don't have a 196 00:16:23.990 --> 00:16:28.190 good answer on that, customers asked me, I've had a few people in Lincoln like, 197 00:16:28.190 --> 00:16:31.240 how do you deal with languages? I'm like, I'm usually just doing english 198 00:16:31.240 --> 00:16:34.930 and distributing in english. That makes sense. That I would want to try to 199 00:16:34.930 --> 00:16:38.930 figure how to do it um, in different languages, I'm gonna have even wondered 200 00:16:38.930 --> 00:16:43.050 like if you're gonna distribute content via podcasting in different languages 201 00:16:43.050 --> 00:16:47.110 is better to have different episodes on the same episode or even split it out 202 00:16:47.110 --> 00:16:50.360 into different podcasts is kind of a thing. I would be interesting. It will 203 00:16:50.360 --> 00:16:54.900 be interesting to, to, I think that the spanish have not figured it out. Well, 204 00:16:54.900 --> 00:16:59.910 well, the spanish language area is of course also really, really, really big. 205 00:16:59.910 --> 00:17:04.560 So it would be, maybe it would be interesting also for you guys that beat, 206 00:17:04.560 --> 00:17:11.079 we grew up to do it in to have spanish episodes. Why not? It's huge. But then 207 00:17:11.079 --> 00:17:16.520 then you also have to have people who are who are natively or really, you got 208 00:17:16.520 --> 00:17:19.119 to think about your customer service teams and all that kind of stuff to 209 00:17:19.119 --> 00:17:22.720 work backwards and the languages, you know, that's something you guys have to 210 00:17:22.720 --> 00:17:25.599 think about and you're probably a little bit more but certainly symptom 211 00:17:25.599 --> 00:17:29.130 we're thinking more out here more. So we've kind of covered like what you 212 00:17:29.130 --> 00:17:32.580 would be doing in a smaller company if you're just getting started and what 213 00:17:32.580 --> 00:17:36.870 you're doing at your current organization. Um But I'd love to hear 214 00:17:36.870 --> 00:17:41.910 like if your boss walked in and gave you 10 X the budget to expand it, would 215 00:17:41.910 --> 00:17:44.910 you do something different or would you just scale what you're currently doing 216 00:17:44.910 --> 00:17:49.550 and make it more like tell me about what that would look like? Yeah, I I 217 00:17:49.550 --> 00:17:52.600 think I would definitely scale what we're what we're doing because when I 218 00:17:52.600 --> 00:17:58.180 started at this company I I came from uh I have a publishing and journalism 219 00:17:58.180 --> 00:18:02.420 background. So I really like the publishing part of the whole media 220 00:18:02.430 --> 00:18:08.940 media game. And I really see ourselves also really as a as a publisher of data 221 00:18:08.950 --> 00:18:14.320 and of qualitative. Really really good and professional too high professional 222 00:18:14.320 --> 00:18:20.660 standards insights on digital customer experience. So I I would definitely 223 00:18:20.670 --> 00:18:26.570 what I'd love is that everybody every company who wants to sell something 224 00:18:26.570 --> 00:18:31.870 online worked with us in the future. So I would definitely scale what we what 225 00:18:31.870 --> 00:18:37.640 we do what we do now and increase the budget for translations, increase the 226 00:18:37.640 --> 00:18:42.780 budget for editing. And I would really love to see are we now have research 227 00:18:42.780 --> 00:18:48.800 team of uh 11 digital research consultants. So there they studied 228 00:18:48.810 --> 00:18:54.600 neuropsychology or psychology or economics or or marketing and what we 229 00:18:54.600 --> 00:18:58.660 what we what I really would love is that they can only have two that, that 230 00:18:58.660 --> 00:19:04.590 they can check the content that is created by by external riders, so that 231 00:19:04.590 --> 00:19:08.790 you can scale up all the, all the things you already do and that, that 232 00:19:08.790 --> 00:19:14.450 just costs a lot of money to get professional riders who are skilled, 233 00:19:14.460 --> 00:19:20.190 who are flawless in their in their english and you also, I don't wanna 234 00:19:20.200 --> 00:19:24.600 have to check on what they've written, but you just know that it's that it's 235 00:19:24.600 --> 00:19:29.790 good from a language perspective of them, and I would I would definitely 236 00:19:29.790 --> 00:19:37.570 scale the distribution part. So, what we now do is we, we advertise a lot on 237 00:19:37.570 --> 00:19:44.330 on linkedin and we targeted on specific, specific job job groups or on people 238 00:19:44.330 --> 00:19:49.220 who are in the industry of finance, in the Netherlands, who are responsible 239 00:19:49.220 --> 00:19:54.640 for the mortgage or personal loan journey. You can easily target them on, 240 00:19:54.640 --> 00:19:59.540 on linkedin. But there are all around the planet. There are people who are 241 00:19:59.550 --> 00:20:05.470 doing that job at different banks and we want to reach them with all our 242 00:20:05.480 --> 00:20:09.240 research because really relevant for them, and if the data is not relevant 243 00:20:09.240 --> 00:20:14.640 for them, they should give us a call or drop us an email and say, hey, can you 244 00:20:14.650 --> 00:20:20.520 do this study for me in Portugal because I want to have a data of my own, 245 00:20:20.530 --> 00:20:26.610 uh, of the country I'm responsible for. So the scaling up about everything we 246 00:20:26.610 --> 00:20:34.350 did in the last year was getting the company ready to ready to skill. So 247 00:20:34.360 --> 00:20:38.570 that is the mantra of this year. And it's also for that, that's from the 248 00:20:38.570 --> 00:20:43.940 business perspective. So getting the organization ready to uh, to maximize 249 00:20:43.940 --> 00:20:48.510 the amount of studies we do in the next year, but it's also for the, for the 250 00:20:48.510 --> 00:20:56.060 fault leadership efforts and for our messages. We uh, we push to the, to the 251 00:20:56.060 --> 00:21:03.050 world, I want to have more more of what we already do because it's really, I 252 00:21:03.060 --> 00:21:10.570 think original research is the way to go to uh, to be, to be and stay 253 00:21:10.580 --> 00:21:19.010 relevant in this uh, in this era of, of info overload. So, um, and what I would 254 00:21:19.010 --> 00:21:28.570 do is because that's really also tends to be expensive in a way, uh, have more 255 00:21:28.580 --> 00:21:35.450 more on video marketing and create a Youtube channel and have it have it 256 00:21:35.460 --> 00:21:41.200 optimized for SEO purposes. And so that we can also be really that we can all 257 00:21:41.210 --> 00:21:47.280 that we get found more easily in what is the biggest, the second biggest 258 00:21:47.290 --> 00:21:52.450 search engine of the world. And we, yeah, we tend to forget that Youtube is 259 00:21:52.840 --> 00:21:57.760 that's that, that Youtube is the second biggest search engine of the world and, 260 00:21:57.760 --> 00:22:02.980 and we now don't don't do a lot of Yeah, yeah, but we we we we don't have that 261 00:22:02.990 --> 00:22:07.920 at this moment. And it's also, of course it's also priorities. But it's 262 00:22:07.920 --> 00:22:14.470 also uh, yeah, money and have an agency who helps you with that for content. We 263 00:22:14.470 --> 00:22:19.980 have already a translation and editing agency helping us with that. Its 264 00:22:19.980 --> 00:22:24.780 content to its based in the Netherlands and Amsterdam also, that's also already 265 00:22:24.780 --> 00:22:30.890 really nice in my idea of of of getting skills that you have a flexible set of 266 00:22:30.900 --> 00:22:37.510 professionals who write better than you. That that you can just ask to write 267 00:22:37.520 --> 00:22:42.080 content piece X or Y and they just do it and deliver it on time and stick to 268 00:22:42.080 --> 00:22:48.850 their deadlines. I really love that. Yeah. Hey, everybody Logan with sweet 269 00:22:48.850 --> 00:22:52.240 fish here. If you've been listening to the show for a while, you know where 270 00:22:52.240 --> 00:22:56.970 big proponents of putting out original organic content on linked in. But one 271 00:22:56.970 --> 00:23:01.130 thing that's always been a struggle for a team like ours is to easily track the 272 00:23:01.130 --> 00:23:04.900 reach of that linked in content. That's why I was really excited when I heard 273 00:23:04.900 --> 00:23:08.830 about Shield the other day from a connection on, you guessed it linked in 274 00:23:08.840 --> 00:23:13.700 since our team started using Shield. I've loved how it's led us easily track 275 00:23:13.710 --> 00:23:17.630 and analyze the performance of our linkedin content without having to 276 00:23:17.630 --> 00:23:21.480 manually log it ourselves. It automatically creates reports and 277 00:23:21.480 --> 00:23:25.100 generate some dashboards that are incredibly useful to see things like 278 00:23:25.110 --> 00:23:28.570 what contents been performing the best and what days of the week are we 279 00:23:28.570 --> 00:23:32.960 getting the most engagement and our average views per post, I highly 280 00:23:32.960 --> 00:23:36.410 suggest you guys check out this tool. If you're putting out content on linked 281 00:23:36.410 --> 00:23:40.540 in and if you're not you should be. It's been a game changer for us. If you 282 00:23:40.540 --> 00:23:45.710 go to shield app dot ai and check out the 10 day free trial. You can even use 283 00:23:45.720 --> 00:23:51.980 our promo code B two B growth to get a 25% discount again. That's shield app 284 00:23:51.990 --> 00:23:58.160 dot Ai And that promo code is B the number two de growth. All one word. All 285 00:23:58.160 --> 00:24:04.800 right. Let's get back to the show. So I definitely hear you want to build a 286 00:24:04.800 --> 00:24:10.420 writing team? Maybe have an editor can like editing and kind of moderating 287 00:24:10.420 --> 00:24:15.340 that writing team. Right? Maybe a small video team if if it was 10 X the budget. 288 00:24:15.340 --> 00:24:20.360 Right, definitely. Would you add like a subject matter expert to the mix that 289 00:24:20.360 --> 00:24:25.970 could do nothing but talk or would you go and find just find external subject 290 00:24:25.970 --> 00:24:30.120 matter experts in order to get more data from Or would you just depend on 291 00:24:30.120 --> 00:24:34.930 the benchmarks you already have? I almost wonder if like 10 x the budget, 292 00:24:34.930 --> 00:24:40.880 I'd almost be hiring someone that was nothing but the idea guy or a girl, you 293 00:24:40.880 --> 00:24:45.450 know looking at the data and then just I pretty much just put a microphone in 294 00:24:45.450 --> 00:24:49.160 front of that person, just be like talk will be turned into a lot of articles 295 00:24:49.160 --> 00:24:55.750 or something like that. Well uh if you if you take a look at how Forrester 296 00:24:55.760 --> 00:25:02.060 Research company did that in the last years. They had keynote speakers all 297 00:25:02.060 --> 00:25:06.070 over the, all over the place and when those keynote speakers became 298 00:25:06.070 --> 00:25:11.330 successful they left Forrester so it's Jeremiah o yang brian solis chillingly 299 00:25:11.330 --> 00:25:16.570 just burn off to name a few. They all uh that was the strategy of first to 300 00:25:16.570 --> 00:25:21.810 get the first message across and they did nothing. They did exactly what you, 301 00:25:21.820 --> 00:25:25.620 what you said. And they also were principal consultants, of course, so 302 00:25:25.620 --> 00:25:30.200 they did the probably, I don't know, I've never worked at first and also 303 00:25:30.210 --> 00:25:35.540 didn't talk to them the last couple of years. But but what they did is is just 304 00:25:35.550 --> 00:25:43.140 get the get a really inspiring story online or digital or on well board, 305 00:25:43.140 --> 00:25:48.400 board level uh, strategic stuff that people found relevant. And they wrote 306 00:25:48.400 --> 00:25:53.210 books about it and they and they were all over the place in the last last 307 00:25:53.210 --> 00:25:59.250 decade. And that's really, really smart. But it's also of course costing a lot 308 00:25:59.250 --> 00:26:05.590 of money in a way because it's not always directly delivering dollars or, 309 00:26:05.590 --> 00:26:11.060 or bottom line euros. But that's a really interesting strategy uh, 310 00:26:11.070 --> 00:26:15.690 strategy to go. But I think that you have to have a bit of a scale in your 311 00:26:15.690 --> 00:26:21.890 organization to to adapt to that strategy. But in small, we're already 312 00:26:21.890 --> 00:26:29.300 doing that because our our our ceo is now more becoming the the guy who gets 313 00:26:29.300 --> 00:26:36.550 the uh boom message across uh talking about digital excellence at at big uh 314 00:26:36.560 --> 00:26:42.140 Fintech, uh I was ATF innovate, innovate europe in the last uh in 315 00:26:42.150 --> 00:26:46.920 november. So he's already getting the stages and in the in the in the 316 00:26:46.920 --> 00:26:51.920 Netherlands were already delivered keynotes by are researchers, 317 00:26:51.930 --> 00:26:57.280 researchers sometimes with clients in duo duo presentation. And they get on 318 00:26:57.280 --> 00:27:04.750 the on the speaking platform because uh they also love to of course they wanna 319 00:27:04.760 --> 00:27:11.500 they wanna shine with their expertise, but it's also really interesting as a 320 00:27:11.500 --> 00:27:17.230 professional to do those uh performances. Um so in small, we 321 00:27:17.230 --> 00:27:25.850 already uh we already did it, but um if you have 10 times the budget, then uh 322 00:27:25.860 --> 00:27:32.530 probably you can hire more research consultants who spend more time on 323 00:27:32.530 --> 00:27:38.250 those guest appearances and fly around the world to get the message across. If 324 00:27:38.250 --> 00:27:45.570 Covid, Covid is gone then probably uh we will again fly around the world and 325 00:27:45.580 --> 00:27:50.640 and and take some more international also create a more international 326 00:27:50.640 --> 00:27:56.820 footprint there. But to be honest that costs a lot of Yeah I definitely think 327 00:27:56.830 --> 00:27:59.970 I think you're right and that the bigger piece would be the publishing 328 00:27:59.970 --> 00:28:04.460 team, the writing and publishing team. Right? Because there's probably your 329 00:28:04.460 --> 00:28:07.370 company already has subject matter experts. The time is actually 330 00:28:07.380 --> 00:28:11.450 converting their expertise into thought leadership, converting their ideas into 331 00:28:11.450 --> 00:28:15.760 something that people can actually read and consume. Because I don't know I 332 00:28:15.760 --> 00:28:20.750 find that subject matter experts are usually not the best writing and like 333 00:28:20.750 --> 00:28:26.090 presenting. So having a so a journalist especially a team with the journalistic 334 00:28:26.100 --> 00:28:29.810 background is going to be able to take and turn a lot of those ideas into 335 00:28:29.810 --> 00:28:34.340 something they just consumed a lot more what what what what we see at our 336 00:28:34.340 --> 00:28:40.450 company is that they are rock stars in presenting and they are also uh rock 337 00:28:40.450 --> 00:28:44.390 stars in writing. But they at this moment they're not that they don't have 338 00:28:44.400 --> 00:28:47.860 most of the time, they don't have time to do it because they're working for 339 00:28:47.940 --> 00:28:54.090 demanding clients and it's totally appropriate that they are demanding 340 00:28:54.090 --> 00:28:57.860 because they just want one of the best and they can get it. But it costs a lot 341 00:28:57.860 --> 00:29:04.220 of time to serve them. So it's it's also uh and what I can't do it all, you 342 00:29:04.230 --> 00:29:08.390 better to have your expertise pushing pushing the way forward and having 343 00:29:08.390 --> 00:29:12.130 somebody else doing the thing that you can hire them out for. Yeah or or you 344 00:29:12.140 --> 00:29:17.530 you should. And that's also what I would definitely do if you uh if I if I 345 00:29:17.530 --> 00:29:21.500 would have had 10 times the budget, I would definitely push the budget 346 00:29:21.510 --> 00:29:29.350 towards the research team. And also towards uh to get maybe to come to 347 00:29:29.350 --> 00:29:36.470 agreement of 20 or 30, of your time comes in is reserved for content 348 00:29:36.470 --> 00:29:41.380 marketing purposes. And be it a podcast, be it a white paper, be it a blog 349 00:29:41.390 --> 00:29:46.940 article being the keynote speech at a big webinar, It doesn't matter. But 350 00:29:46.940 --> 00:29:52.210 that's something that that is. I'm working on that every day to get to get 351 00:29:52.210 --> 00:29:59.640 the to get that message across. And yes, it does really matter what kind of 352 00:29:59.640 --> 00:30:05.750 people what kind of D. N. A. That's you have inside you if you're an introvert 353 00:30:05.750 --> 00:30:10.280 or an extrovert. And and then what I would say is that you have to cherish 354 00:30:10.280 --> 00:30:16.290 that and and see how you can contribute instead of saying this is, this is 355 00:30:16.290 --> 00:30:20.800 nothing, this is nothing for me. And let me just do some, let me just do the 356 00:30:20.800 --> 00:30:26.410 client berg, that's a really big shift were making at the company also that 357 00:30:26.420 --> 00:30:32.550 everybody can contribute in a way and I'm facilitating, uh, that they can 358 00:30:32.560 --> 00:30:38.460 contribute so everything, everything is possible. Yeah. My last question is 359 00:30:38.460 --> 00:30:43.220 following up on video. I actually find video to be very fascinating. I do have 360 00:30:43.220 --> 00:30:46.630 in my, my like, I guess I don't even have it written down, but in my mental 361 00:30:46.630 --> 00:30:50.400 roadmap for sweet fish media to push hard into Youtube Within the next year 362 00:30:50.400 --> 00:30:54.200 or two. I think YouTube is going to get bigger, even though as big as it is 363 00:30:54.200 --> 00:30:57.120 already. I'm like, I don't know, I'm predicting that it's going to be twice 364 00:30:57.120 --> 00:31:01.630 as big in 10 years. But though I'm curious to hear like, why are you going 365 00:31:01.630 --> 00:31:04.640 into Youtube? Like what's your hypothesis in video and Youtube 366 00:31:04.640 --> 00:31:10.820 specifically? Yeah, I recently saw a presentation of video marketing agency 367 00:31:10.820 --> 00:31:18.210 and he said that the how to content is and also the uh, yeah, so how to 368 00:31:18.210 --> 00:31:24.360 content is really container is that it's a lot, but that people are just 369 00:31:24.440 --> 00:31:31.050 searching for on Youtube tube explore and to do, to do stuff themselves or 370 00:31:31.060 --> 00:31:36.070 learn, learn stuff, learned how to do stuff. And I would say that that there 371 00:31:36.070 --> 00:31:42.980 is a big chance also uh for us and that if I agree with you that youtube is 372 00:31:42.990 --> 00:31:49.930 really big and, and also I think also it's gonna gonna grow uh faster than 373 00:31:49.930 --> 00:31:57.260 they just really, really dominant. And we, we forget that people search there. 374 00:31:57.640 --> 00:32:02.670 First they go to google and second they go to go to Youtube to search for stuff 375 00:32:02.680 --> 00:32:09.060 and video is now so much more easy. It's not it's not all the internet 376 00:32:09.060 --> 00:32:15.330 connection speeds are are there five G is coming up? Everybody has a big as 377 00:32:15.340 --> 00:32:20.900 powerful uh internet internet speed in the in the in the western world. So 378 00:32:20.910 --> 00:32:24.800 that was that was in the past, that was the big problem with video. And then 379 00:32:24.940 --> 00:32:29.560 yeah, you just say oh well we can more easily do it in text and it's more uh 380 00:32:29.570 --> 00:32:34.790 it's better found in google but we're in a total different different 381 00:32:34.790 --> 00:32:40.770 landscape at this moment. So for me also it would be really more logical to 382 00:32:41.240 --> 00:32:49.680 get the message out also on on Youtube. And and I think we're also gonna start 383 00:32:49.680 --> 00:32:54.670 it somewhere this year just with all the videos that we're now publishing 384 00:32:54.670 --> 00:33:00.840 native on on on Lincoln, I'm just gonna upload them all to Youtube and get some 385 00:33:00.850 --> 00:33:08.060 advice by the video marketing guys on how to optimize it for S. E. O. 386 00:33:08.060 --> 00:33:13.960 Purposes. And then I'm gonna see what happens and it's more or less ashamed. 387 00:33:14.040 --> 00:33:19.460 But we didn't already professionalize our, our Youtube channel at this at 388 00:33:19.460 --> 00:33:25.210 this moment. So that's a note to self uh this moment. Yeah, I think you're 389 00:33:25.210 --> 00:33:29.940 good. I actually think by doing now you're early In my opinion. Like B2B 390 00:33:29.940 --> 00:33:34.010 content doesn't do that great on YouTube right now. Real estate didn't 391 00:33:34.010 --> 00:33:40.230 do well on Youtube until two years ago now, it's blowing up like, But if you 392 00:33:40.230 --> 00:33:44.560 look at the trends of Youtube, the way gen Z interacts with Youtube is very 393 00:33:44.560 --> 00:33:48.060 different from millennials, Millennials would go there and reference things all 394 00:33:48.060 --> 00:33:53.130 the time, but gen Z like subscribes the channels are like passionate about 395 00:33:53.130 --> 00:33:57.100 following every single video from certain creators. So their consumption 396 00:33:57.100 --> 00:34:00.950 levels like through the roof compared to millennials and they're just now 397 00:34:00.950 --> 00:34:04.560 graduating college, depending on where you put gen Z at. As far as your 398 00:34:04.560 --> 00:34:11.580 timeline goes, If you put it at 2000, then there what, 2020 21? So they're 21 399 00:34:11.590 --> 00:34:15.090 they're literally just like, they're in their last year of college, maybe you 400 00:34:15.090 --> 00:34:18.550 push it, push it all the way back to 95 but they're just out of college. They 401 00:34:18.550 --> 00:34:21.860 haven't yet really started searching for all the stuff that's considered me 402 00:34:21.860 --> 00:34:25.120 to be because usually getting into B two B maybe you're studying like 403 00:34:25.120 --> 00:34:27.750 marketing in general, in college and you're starting to go through those 404 00:34:28.040 --> 00:34:31.560 Crappy YouTube videos that are there. But even like marketing in general, 405 00:34:31.560 --> 00:34:35.360 entrepreneurialism is really popular on YouTube. But like B2B content isn't 406 00:34:35.360 --> 00:34:40.630 popular yet. Right? As gen Z starts to grow up and starts to do what they do 407 00:34:40.630 --> 00:34:43.300 by learning through youtube, they're gonna start looking for me to be 408 00:34:43.300 --> 00:34:46.900 content. They're gonna start looking for those deeper things beyond what 409 00:34:46.900 --> 00:34:51.650 Neil Patel's posting. So it's going to be bigger and there's going to be more 410 00:34:51.650 --> 00:34:55.460 people there and YouTube so far is the only place that like, really pays 411 00:34:55.460 --> 00:34:58.860 creators. So I expect that that's going to pan out over the next 10 years. 412 00:34:59.340 --> 00:35:03.080 Everybody else just like wants you to give them money to reach your full 413 00:35:03.080 --> 00:35:07.710 audience where youtube actually pays you. So I think more and more creators 414 00:35:07.710 --> 00:35:11.300 going to go there interesting. They, they've got a, that's my, that's my two 415 00:35:11.300 --> 00:35:15.620 cents on youtube anyway, so I think you're, you're not late to the game. 416 00:35:15.630 --> 00:35:23.000 Great. That's a, that's a relief for, at this moment. Yeah. Even now I think 417 00:35:23.000 --> 00:35:27.160 I have two years before we can still be considered early. One thing I do know 418 00:35:27.160 --> 00:35:31.640 about Youtube's, it takes a long time. Like so be prepared to like slog 419 00:35:31.640 --> 00:35:35.790 through it for like quite a few years before you start to see traction. Even 420 00:35:35.790 --> 00:35:40.310 if you're giving it your best shot, it's a long game. Everybody I've heard 421 00:35:40.310 --> 00:35:44.800 that gets successful on Youtube is like, they're like, oh yeah, we just, we knew 422 00:35:44.800 --> 00:35:48.370 we were going to make a 3 to 5 year commitment and didn't, we just just 423 00:35:48.370 --> 00:35:51.570 decided not to really like we looked at the metrics to optimize of course, but 424 00:35:51.570 --> 00:35:56.730 like we didn't let the lack of being having a million subscribers like stop 425 00:35:56.730 --> 00:36:01.550 us from producing our best content every week. So it just takes a long 426 00:36:01.550 --> 00:36:06.860 time. But those who pay it early. By the time we're getting around 2030, 427 00:36:06.870 --> 00:36:11.070 we'll be reaping the rewards. That's, that's my opinion. And I think a lot 428 00:36:11.070 --> 00:36:15.400 leadership is going to play a big role in that. Anyway, I have to wrap this up. 429 00:36:15.400 --> 00:36:19.420 This has been a fantastic time getting to know you Matthew and getting to know 430 00:36:19.420 --> 00:36:24.020 what you would be doing for companies, where they're small or who are growing 431 00:36:24.020 --> 00:36:28.730 rapidly and have lots of cash to spend. If people want to learn more and dive 432 00:36:28.730 --> 00:36:32.150 into what you've, all the insights you've learned about thought leadership 433 00:36:32.150 --> 00:36:35.610 after doing this for over five years. Um where can they go to learn more 434 00:36:35.610 --> 00:36:42.320 about you? And your company will uh well best is uh just visit the website 435 00:36:42.320 --> 00:36:47.340 and then you can do a global dot com and you get, if you are a new visitor 436 00:36:47.340 --> 00:36:52.240 you get you get a pop up with subscribe subscription to our newsletter monthly. 437 00:36:52.330 --> 00:37:00.040 And all our data and fresh research is published on our linkedin linkedin page. 438 00:37:00.330 --> 00:37:06.130 And that's uh easily found fire fire of a global in in the Lincoln search and 439 00:37:06.130 --> 00:37:11.130 in the company a company section. Uh yeah, that would that would be best to 440 00:37:11.140 --> 00:37:17.460 say they updated and you can connect with me on linkedin also with otitis 441 00:37:17.460 --> 00:37:22.460 funding book. Fantastic again. Thank you for joining me. I'm GDP Growth. 442 00:37:23.030 --> 00:37:24.050 Thanks for having me dan 443 00:37:26.430 --> 00:37:31.070 Is your buyer at BDB Marketer. If so, you should think about sponsoring this 444 00:37:31.070 --> 00:37:36.020 podcast. BTB growth gets downloaded over 130 1000 times each month and our 445 00:37:36.020 --> 00:37:39.840 listeners are marketing decision makers. If it sounds interesting, send Logan 446 00:37:39.840 --> 00:37:44.250 and email Logan at sweet fish Media dot com.