Transcript
WEBVTT
1
00:00:06.000 --> 00:00:09.310
Welcome back to be tob growth.
I'm looking lyles with sweet fish media.
2
00:00:09.509 --> 00:00:13.230
I'm joined today by David Fourteen.
Oh, he's the STP of audience and
3
00:00:13.349 --> 00:00:15.990
product over at netline. David,
welcome to the show. How's it going
4
00:00:16.070 --> 00:00:18.309
today, sir? It's going great. Thanks so much for having me.
5
00:00:18.710 --> 00:00:23.300
Awesome. We are going to be
unpacking some lessons learned from a report that
6
00:00:23.460 --> 00:00:26.500
you guys do. I believe you're
on your fourth edition of this. Tell
7
00:00:26.500 --> 00:00:30.899
us a little bit about about the
report. Really all around content consumption.
8
00:00:31.300 --> 00:00:35.700
Not Not a more applicable topic for
B Tob Marketers today than this, but
9
00:00:35.810 --> 00:00:38.250
give us a little bit of context. How long you guys been doing this?
10
00:00:38.609 --> 00:00:41.890
Why it's so important that you guys
have have been doing this on a
11
00:00:41.929 --> 00:00:45.329
regular basis over at netline? Sure, sure, do Ya. So this
12
00:00:45.409 --> 00:00:50.679
is our fourth edition. It's formally
known, or actually known, as the
13
00:00:50.759 --> 00:00:55.359
two thousand and twenty state of B
Tob content consumption and demand report. It's
14
00:00:55.759 --> 00:00:59.719
really started four years ago, based
upon questions from our own clients, saying,
15
00:00:59.759 --> 00:01:03.719
okay, you're processing all of this
data on an annualized basis, seeing
16
00:01:03.840 --> 00:01:10.069
the content consumption trends that were occurring
and really the customers wanted to better understand
17
00:01:10.109 --> 00:01:12.310
what was happening, not only as
it related to their content, but other
18
00:01:12.670 --> 00:01:18.859
other competing organizations as well. Simultaneously, as an executive team, we met
19
00:01:18.980 --> 00:01:23.019
and really tried to force ourselves to
rethink about how we were going to market
20
00:01:23.140 --> 00:01:26.659
right and and so most organizations talk
about their products and their services and sure
21
00:01:26.780 --> 00:01:30.739
there's a content marketing strategy around that. But for us, who's always about
22
00:01:30.780 --> 00:01:37.290
the processing and capture of First Party, fully permission data that we deliver at
23
00:01:37.329 --> 00:01:42.010
scale to our customers. And so
why not make data really front and Center
24
00:01:42.090 --> 00:01:45.849
for us as a company and build
that out as our core pillar for any
25
00:01:45.890 --> 00:01:51.000
marketing strategy, not just content marketing, and then allow that data to educate
26
00:01:51.159 --> 00:01:53.879
marketers across the BB landscape so that
they could be better at what they do?
27
00:01:55.640 --> 00:01:57.879
The thought process there is pretty simple, right, is that if marketers
28
00:01:57.920 --> 00:02:02.069
become reliant on us as a way
to become more insightful and educated about their
29
00:02:02.109 --> 00:02:06.709
executions and they're more likely to become
a client of ours. And that obviously
30
00:02:06.750 --> 00:02:09.150
has proven itself out over time,
or we wouldn't continue to do it.
31
00:02:09.389 --> 00:02:15.349
So I guess the one cool observation
there is I've kind of come to the
32
00:02:15.389 --> 00:02:19.460
conclusion that, regardless of what type
of company you work at, as a
33
00:02:19.539 --> 00:02:23.460
marketer, you should really be seeking
internally, trying to find those nuggets and
34
00:02:23.539 --> 00:02:29.259
superstar things that make you guys special
and find a way to externally articulate that.
35
00:02:29.460 --> 00:02:31.210
For us it's data, but for
every type of company it could be
36
00:02:31.289 --> 00:02:35.610
something different. Yeah, I mean
what I hear you saying is just thought
37
00:02:35.650 --> 00:02:38.849
leadership, one and one, you
know, delivering and being helpful and trying
38
00:02:38.930 --> 00:02:42.650
to analyze the trends in the way
that you can. It's a little bit
39
00:02:42.729 --> 00:02:45.759
Meta for you guys, because you're
all about the data for the audience that
40
00:02:45.840 --> 00:02:50.199
you serve, whether that's be to
be marketers or ctos or or HR leaders
41
00:02:50.240 --> 00:02:53.080
and talent leaders whatever. That absolutely
I think our one riff, though,
42
00:02:53.120 --> 00:03:00.150
on thought leadership, is that we
were in a crowded space and Martech in
43
00:03:00.270 --> 00:03:04.669
general's extremely crowded and there's a lot
of pontification, and then there's also a
44
00:03:04.830 --> 00:03:08.509
ton of surveys of two hundred of
your peers right and then it's a bunch
45
00:03:08.509 --> 00:03:12.979
of talking heads at the executive level
all saying the same thing about what's going
46
00:03:13.020 --> 00:03:17.539
to happen next. Year and we
made a cognizant decision to not do that.
47
00:03:19.020 --> 00:03:23.340
We didn't want us to be the
thought leader. The data was right
48
00:03:23.460 --> 00:03:27.289
and I think it is a distinction
there to say this is fact, this
49
00:03:27.449 --> 00:03:30.930
is an opinion, this is not
some projected story that we believe will come
50
00:03:31.129 --> 00:03:37.289
true. This is based upon over
five million leads and over Sixteen Peta bytes
51
00:03:37.330 --> 00:03:42.360
worth the content consumption behavior being analyzed. I saw that as we were connecting
52
00:03:42.520 --> 00:03:45.280
over email before this interview. PEDA
bytes. I was like, when was
53
00:03:45.319 --> 00:03:50.159
the last time I read Peta Bytes? I can't remember. Let's talk about
54
00:03:50.199 --> 00:03:53.520
data a little bit. You you
mentioned this significance of First Party data.
55
00:03:53.639 --> 00:03:58.550
Talk a little bit about first party
versus third party in what you guys were
56
00:03:58.590 --> 00:04:01.189
seeing. Now, as we get
into the methodology and then unpacking some of
57
00:04:01.229 --> 00:04:04.590
the findings here. Yeah, and
I think there's so first party versus third
58
00:04:04.669 --> 00:04:10.740
party. I'll describe and then we'll
go into some particular reasons of importance,
59
00:04:10.780 --> 00:04:14.699
especially now moving forward. And so
first party, as it sounds like,
60
00:04:15.419 --> 00:04:21.420
is directly sourced by individual users directly
participating with content and deciding to share their
61
00:04:21.500 --> 00:04:27.730
information with you. So examples of
that could be a person on an inbound
62
00:04:27.769 --> 00:04:30.129
strategy, finding their way to your
corporate website, filling out a form,
63
00:04:30.370 --> 00:04:35.009
downloading a white paper or so on. On an our capacity, we operate
64
00:04:35.050 --> 00:04:41.560
a content syndication platform that's completely focused
on driving by or engagement with be tob
65
00:04:41.639 --> 00:04:46.920
buyers, and so all of that
consumption is taking place as users are proactively
66
00:04:46.959 --> 00:04:51.120
being recommended content specific to their business
or technical challenges, but providing their own
67
00:04:51.199 --> 00:04:56.949
information when they're at the being prompted
to actually request and engage with that content.
68
00:04:57.750 --> 00:05:00.589
There's a ton of effort and energy
and money being spent on the opposite
69
00:05:00.589 --> 00:05:04.029
side of the industry, which would
be around third party data. You'll hear
70
00:05:04.069 --> 00:05:10.740
references to this around intend or signals, things like that. I wouldn't say
71
00:05:10.779 --> 00:05:14.939
it's not used. It's or not
necessarily you need to be used. It's
72
00:05:14.980 --> 00:05:20.180
certainly valuable. That said, it
comes down to the fundamental debts I hear
73
00:05:20.300 --> 00:05:26.170
and part of its philosophical which is, are you okay as a marketer,
74
00:05:26.649 --> 00:05:31.730
tapping into data sets where your customer
has zero idea that they're participating? And
75
00:05:31.850 --> 00:05:36.920
it's a really a challenging philosophy for
much of the web right much of display
76
00:05:36.959 --> 00:05:43.000
based advertising has been predicated on buying
audiences when the audiences have no idea that
77
00:05:43.079 --> 00:05:46.519
they're being sold. Social Media has
a classic case of that as well.
78
00:05:46.560 --> 00:05:49.189
We're just on the opposite side of
the spectrum, right, users that have
79
00:05:49.430 --> 00:05:54.790
to make a choice. They are
provided the ability to do so. It's
80
00:05:54.870 --> 00:05:59.269
their choice to provide their information and, as such, the intent associated to
81
00:05:59.430 --> 00:06:01.670
that type of user, who sees
your brand, who sees that long form,
82
00:06:02.069 --> 00:06:08.819
who sees your content, decides to
engage, is statistically exponentially greater than
83
00:06:08.860 --> 00:06:13.939
a user who's cookies been followed unknowingly
for thirteen days and traveling, you know,
84
00:06:14.100 --> 00:06:17.139
watching their behavior as it hits various
news websites. It's not to say
85
00:06:17.180 --> 00:06:21.209
that that's not interesting and doesn't give
you a better picture of your users journey,
86
00:06:21.370 --> 00:06:28.850
but realistically I think you've got to
separate that. Now, looking forward,
87
00:06:29.290 --> 00:06:32.680
there's a ton of pushback from the
attack and also even the government industries
88
00:06:33.959 --> 00:06:39.639
on the lack of use of third
party data, especially across domains, and
89
00:06:39.759 --> 00:06:45.560
then also the push towards the removal
of cookies in general, and so all
90
00:06:45.759 --> 00:06:48.389
of those models are predicated on third
party data sets, not first party,
91
00:06:48.550 --> 00:06:54.670
and so you're seeing a lot of
media companies now digging back in to the
92
00:06:54.790 --> 00:06:59.350
age old model that won't die and
starting to create new email newsletters. The
93
00:06:59.709 --> 00:07:02.819
whole idea. There's your caption,
first party data. You're then building progressive
94
00:07:02.819 --> 00:07:06.459
profiles and so on and going from
there. Yeah, it seems like most
95
00:07:06.500 --> 00:07:12.060
marketers I talked to the the size
of their own email list is still,
96
00:07:12.420 --> 00:07:15.970
you know, a very important staff
for them, because it is, it
97
00:07:15.370 --> 00:07:19.290
is somewhat that the keys to the
castle. Let's talk a little bit about
98
00:07:19.370 --> 00:07:23.850
some that's talked about in the report
that you guys called the consumption gap.
99
00:07:23.889 --> 00:07:27.370
UNPACK that force a little bit.
They would, I should are so the
100
00:07:27.449 --> 00:07:32.360
consumption gap was a phrase that we
coined on our first report and it was
101
00:07:32.480 --> 00:07:36.800
based upon an observation that we actually
never knew. We tract, we found
102
00:07:36.839 --> 00:07:42.800
the data set just lurking and our
engineering team delivered it to us and we
103
00:07:42.879 --> 00:07:46.829
didn't really know what to really decipher
it as. And ultimately it's the time
104
00:07:47.029 --> 00:07:53.189
between when a user actually decides to
request your content, so they're registering for
105
00:07:53.230 --> 00:07:58.779
a Webinar or downloading an ebook or
a podcast or white paper, and the
106
00:07:58.899 --> 00:08:03.459
time that they ultimately get around to
consuming it. And so what's mind blowing
107
00:08:03.579 --> 00:08:07.699
is that, regardless of the year
that we've published the report, on average,
108
00:08:07.740 --> 00:08:11.819
it's taking well over twenty four hours
for the actual professional to get around
109
00:08:11.139 --> 00:08:16.730
to engaging with that content that they
instantaneously did have access to, right.
110
00:08:16.850 --> 00:08:20.730
So, they requested it, they
have access to it immediately. Yeah,
111
00:08:20.850 --> 00:08:22.970
so you're not talking about the gap
between the request for the Info in the
112
00:08:24.009 --> 00:08:28.319
delivery of the content. You're talking
about the time from request to actual consumption,
113
00:08:28.600 --> 00:08:35.080
exactly exactly. And so what's interesting
here is that you're looking at averages
114
00:08:35.120 --> 00:08:37.960
around twenty four hours. For VP's
they're exactly at twenty four four. Senior
115
00:08:39.000 --> 00:08:41.950
directors, they tend to be the
fastest and they'll consume content at around twenty
116
00:08:43.029 --> 00:08:46.669
hours after their initial point of request. Contractors are the absolute worst and that
117
00:08:46.750 --> 00:08:50.710
they take up to forty four to
forty five hours. But what's, I
118
00:08:50.830 --> 00:08:56.019
think, most pertinent here for marketers
to understand is how that fact layers over.
119
00:08:56.059 --> 00:09:01.259
There exist nurture paths and follow up
procedures when it comes to actually interacting
120
00:09:01.299 --> 00:09:09.259
with their sales foaks and so calling
someone instantaneously and saying hey, thanks so
121
00:09:09.299 --> 00:09:13.129
much for downloading the report. What
you think about the data? That's not
122
00:09:13.289 --> 00:09:15.889
the right context. It's not to
say that you can't make the call,
123
00:09:16.370 --> 00:09:20.610
but the context needs to change.
The user has not engaged with your content,
124
00:09:20.730 --> 00:09:24.289
they've not read any of it or
watched a minute of your video.
125
00:09:24.120 --> 00:09:28.120
So you need to still be appreciative
if you want to create that first impression.
126
00:09:28.399 --> 00:09:31.759
Make sure that you're presented as a
resource and that you'll follow up down
127
00:09:31.799 --> 00:09:35.799
the road. It's not it's just
simply not as great starting point. And
128
00:09:35.919 --> 00:09:41.669
knowing this data onhand, we've had
countless clients actually pivot their nurture paths to
129
00:09:41.710 --> 00:09:43.830
run on this lader a little bit
more of a delay. Firsts what they
130
00:09:43.830 --> 00:09:48.629
had, their sales follow up procedures
have changed and so on, and this
131
00:09:48.750 --> 00:09:50.629
is something we put in a practice
on our side. The only time you'd
132
00:09:50.629 --> 00:09:54.899
override that is obvious, and not
if a user explicitly said the requesting for
133
00:09:54.980 --> 00:09:58.100
you to contact them. They want
a demo and yet disregard all of this
134
00:09:58.340 --> 00:10:01.220
and jump right to it. But
yeah, that's it's a huge one.
135
00:10:01.259 --> 00:10:07.330
It's been eye opening because we didn't
necessarily expect to see it be that long.
136
00:10:07.009 --> 00:10:13.370
It defies most understood thought processes related
to that. Has that consumption gap
137
00:10:13.409 --> 00:10:15.730
over the last four years of you, as you guys, have done that
138
00:10:15.850 --> 00:10:18.330
report. Have you seen that Linkedin? Have you seen it shortened? Has
139
00:10:18.370 --> 00:10:24.000
it been the same as it's actually
lengthened really? Okay, so it's taking
140
00:10:24.039 --> 00:10:30.799
eight percent longer this year than in
past years. So, yeah, this
141
00:10:30.919 --> 00:10:33.879
gets into areas where we as a
company try not to go, where we
142
00:10:33.000 --> 00:10:37.470
start hypothesizing about things without facts to
prove them. You know, the fact
143
00:10:37.549 --> 00:10:43.470
is it's taking eight percent longer.
The reality is perhaps the markets more flooded
144
00:10:43.470 --> 00:10:46.269
with content than ever and it's harder
for people to keep up with said content.
145
00:10:48.309 --> 00:10:52.100
There's more distractions, companies are constantly
being asked to do more with less.
146
00:10:52.139 --> 00:10:56.700
All of those things. I'm sure
all of that adds up to you,
147
00:10:56.139 --> 00:11:01.100
some of that delay, but I
can't quantify that with with confidence at
148
00:11:01.100 --> 00:11:05.289
least. So I would say just
aunt about. Yeah, again, this
149
00:11:05.450 --> 00:11:09.450
is just anecdotal, but I know
in in my own experience, often times
150
00:11:09.490 --> 00:11:15.330
I will request a piece of a
piece of content and I will immediately save
151
00:11:15.490 --> 00:11:18.679
that in a bookmarking APP that I
use called pocket. I can catalog it,
152
00:11:18.879 --> 00:11:22.840
I can put tags on it and
it's there from when when I'm ready,
153
00:11:22.879 --> 00:11:28.039
because due exactly times when I when
I find something, it's not necessarily
154
00:11:28.240 --> 00:11:30.799
that I was looking for it.
It might be an email I was subscribed
155
00:11:30.840 --> 00:11:33.990
to or a piece of content that
was promoted on social and it seems interesting
156
00:11:35.029 --> 00:11:37.990
and I don't want to lose it, but it doesn't mean I'm going right
157
00:11:37.190 --> 00:11:43.309
to write to consuming it. The
other metric beyond you know, because I
158
00:11:43.389 --> 00:11:48.820
think we get caught up so much
as marketers in okay, someone's downloaded a
159
00:11:48.820 --> 00:11:52.419
piece of content. That equals a
lade right, and that's because we've been
160
00:11:52.820 --> 00:11:58.340
trained to to be measured on mql's
and ask you and leads in general.
161
00:11:58.740 --> 00:12:03.690
That's where the lead measurement starts.
However, you're pointing out there are several
162
00:12:03.970 --> 00:12:09.049
micro conversions along the way requesting the
content, actually consuming the content. That
163
00:12:09.210 --> 00:12:13.169
gap there. Have you noticed in
your research, David, how much of
164
00:12:13.330 --> 00:12:18.320
that, how much of that requested
content actually goes unconsumed? You talk about
165
00:12:18.320 --> 00:12:22.519
the delay, but then the percentage
that is consumed or unconsumed. Have you
166
00:12:22.559 --> 00:12:24.919
seen some trends around that as well? It's been pretty steady actually, and
167
00:12:26.000 --> 00:12:31.070
it's about eleven percent of content ultimately
gets requested and not engaged with. And
168
00:12:31.350 --> 00:12:37.990
so I've not done enough of a
deeper dive into whether there's commonalities on topics,
169
00:12:39.629 --> 00:12:46.220
on persona of an audience segment that
perhaps bubbles out to a really unique
170
00:12:46.259 --> 00:12:50.019
observation in the market place. It's
a good idea actually. But yeah,
171
00:12:50.019 --> 00:12:54.820
we typically see around eleven percent consistently
on an annualized basis of users who just
172
00:12:54.980 --> 00:12:58.850
don't engage. That's that's actually pretty
encouraging to me. I was exp absolutely
173
00:13:00.049 --> 00:13:01.570
it because I mean, if you
flip that around, that means ninety Bo,
174
00:13:01.769 --> 00:13:05.649
almost ninety percent of that content is
getting consumed, and to me that's
175
00:13:05.690 --> 00:13:09.970
pretty encouraging. I would have expected
that number to be lower. As far
176
00:13:09.970 --> 00:13:13.159
as the actual content consumption, you
know, I had down here that we
177
00:13:13.240 --> 00:13:18.840
wanted to talk about the question of
time. Is that related to the time
178
00:13:18.960 --> 00:13:22.919
of the follow up here or something
else within the report that you wanted to
179
00:13:22.960 --> 00:13:24.679
call out, David? Yeah,
so, as it related to the consumption
180
00:13:24.879 --> 00:13:31.029
gap it, it turns out that
each job area and also job level has
181
00:13:31.070 --> 00:13:35.950
a predisposed time when it's best to
reach them for consuming content, and so
182
00:13:37.070 --> 00:13:39.909
this gets back to not only the
gap but when they're actually engaging with content.
183
00:13:41.029 --> 00:13:46.419
The first place one that's stuck out
was ceasweet professionals. Tuesday at ten
184
00:13:46.500 --> 00:13:52.059
am local time, regardless of the
geographic region, is the best time to
185
00:13:52.179 --> 00:13:56.809
reach them with any type of BB
content. Why that is I have no
186
00:13:56.929 --> 00:14:00.330
idea. It sounds to me.
It seems like a weird time, right,
187
00:14:00.409 --> 00:14:03.330
you would think earlier in the morning, possibly at lunch, mid morning.
188
00:14:05.129 --> 00:14:07.929
I can't compute that. But again, the data is what it is,
189
00:14:09.090 --> 00:14:13.799
and so we've taken a stance where
we are externalizing all of this data,
190
00:14:13.039 --> 00:14:18.600
arming marketers with the information and hopefully
allowing them to execute better campaigns moving
191
00:14:18.679 --> 00:14:22.759
forward. And so if marketers are
thinking about that, that is the the
192
00:14:24.389 --> 00:14:28.870
time when they're best consuming it or
most apt to to request and actually take
193
00:14:28.950 --> 00:14:33.629
action on it. So most like
APP, yeah, most APPs to engage
194
00:14:33.870 --> 00:14:37.940
and and actually engage with your content. So, whether you're using US,
195
00:14:39.059 --> 00:14:43.139
whether you're promoting to your own inhouse
file, if you're running display campaigns,
196
00:14:43.179 --> 00:14:46.059
you could probably do some day parting
around that as well. It might be
197
00:14:46.220 --> 00:14:50.139
some interesting tactics, even if it's
an ABM campaign, knowing that these folks
198
00:14:50.179 --> 00:14:56.450
are at their desks. You're not
wasting impressions because on an ABM display campaign
199
00:14:58.009 --> 00:15:01.490
you're likely to be hitting the account, but not necessarily the sea suite.
200
00:15:01.850 --> 00:15:05.769
So if you were stacking a day
part around ten am local, you're more
201
00:15:05.970 --> 00:15:09.360
more than likely to hit them.
Interesting. I love digging into data like
202
00:15:09.480 --> 00:15:11.600
this. I can, I can
nerve down on it all day long.
203
00:15:11.639 --> 00:15:16.399
David, let's talk a little bit. You know, we've tried not to
204
00:15:16.600 --> 00:15:20.960
hammer the new normals so much all
the time, coronavirus, the the covid
205
00:15:20.000 --> 00:15:24.309
nineteen pandemic. But we've got to
think about what does all of this mean
206
00:15:24.909 --> 00:15:31.190
in a postcovid world as we look
forward to you know whatever, then the
207
00:15:31.350 --> 00:15:35.470
coming months in and years contained it
seems like two thousand and twenty. No
208
00:15:35.590 --> 00:15:37.659
one knows what the heck the next
day is going on ring. But what
209
00:15:37.820 --> 00:15:41.500
are some of the things? Again, without getting into too much hypothesizing,
210
00:15:41.580 --> 00:15:46.419
but what? What is the data
showing marketers that they can take action on,
211
00:15:46.539 --> 00:15:50.409
based on based on these finding staved? Yeah, so the one thing
212
00:15:50.490 --> 00:15:54.809
that we've done there is we've really
tried to take a more interactive stance on
213
00:15:56.490 --> 00:16:00.730
the annualized reporting that we historically have
created. This now the two thousand and
214
00:16:00.730 --> 00:16:04.159
twenty report, and that we typically
would create a static report and then let
215
00:16:04.200 --> 00:16:07.840
a year go by and revisit all
of the data and have another benchmark,
216
00:16:07.919 --> 00:16:12.120
and so that's all well and good, but I don't feel it's good enough
217
00:16:12.279 --> 00:16:17.080
now. And so we've been asked
by a lot of our clients even and
218
00:16:17.279 --> 00:16:22.909
users trying to better understand consumption patterns
as they're happening today throughout the world,
219
00:16:22.750 --> 00:16:26.389
topics that are being impacted, and
so we ultimately have started diving into this
220
00:16:26.470 --> 00:16:33.820
and we've been trying to produce monthly
summaries on the impact that covid had at
221
00:16:33.860 --> 00:16:37.779
a consumption level across job areas,
industries, geographic re agents and so on,
222
00:16:37.940 --> 00:16:44.019
and so that's something we're committed to. Will continuously externalize that on our
223
00:16:44.059 --> 00:16:48.610
blog until we don't have to.
And so at some point I think the
224
00:16:48.649 --> 00:16:51.610
data is just going to normalize and
look as normal as it could be,
225
00:16:51.850 --> 00:16:55.529
an even if that normal is different
than what it was, there's not going
226
00:16:55.570 --> 00:16:59.850
to be any more interesting nuggets and
stories to pull out. If that's the
227
00:16:59.929 --> 00:17:04.480
case, then we'll probably stop that
blog series. The first post we looked
228
00:17:04.519 --> 00:17:08.799
at it was crazy because there was
starting to be a flood of covid related
229
00:17:08.839 --> 00:17:15.309
business content being pushed on the platform
within what was it a week. We
230
00:17:15.430 --> 00:17:22.990
saw as sixty six hundred percent increase
from the beginning of January to the following
231
00:17:22.109 --> 00:17:26.789
week of January and requesting of that
content. What was more interesting, though,
232
00:17:27.109 --> 00:17:32.779
was how that content was being requested
and by whom. And so the
233
00:17:32.940 --> 00:17:37.740
first thing that happened was sea sweet
professionals within large organizations for downloading this content
234
00:17:37.859 --> 00:17:42.019
at least a week in advance of
their peers inside the company. And so
235
00:17:42.299 --> 00:17:47.049
right off the bat we're starting to
think of things differently than we've ever had
236
00:17:47.130 --> 00:17:52.130
as well, where we're able to
see content trends happening live before they're actually
237
00:17:52.210 --> 00:17:56.849
being ruled out. So that was
a great example of seeing senior leadership doing
238
00:17:56.970 --> 00:18:00.599
research about what possible impact this is
going to have on their company and then
239
00:18:00.680 --> 00:18:04.480
ultimately their employees, about a week
and a half to two weeks later,
240
00:18:04.680 --> 00:18:08.559
downloading the same types of content as
they are learning about the things that are
241
00:18:08.559 --> 00:18:12.869
going to happen in their company.
A lot of that content spiking was around
242
00:18:14.069 --> 00:18:22.309
remote employees, were remote management,
management of I would say management, growth
243
00:18:22.470 --> 00:18:26.180
tactic, stress management and oddly,
some anxiety content to yeah, I mean
244
00:18:26.380 --> 00:18:30.940
it makes total sense. The other
thing I think, to pull out of
245
00:18:30.059 --> 00:18:36.859
that lesson, just kind of an
anecdote, thinking about for marketers and for
246
00:18:37.059 --> 00:18:41.259
sellers in the sea suite, the
CEO and others in the sea suite.
247
00:18:41.690 --> 00:18:45.809
I've heard before from folks like Gong
and and others. When you're selling to
248
00:18:45.890 --> 00:18:49.170
the sea sweet you need to talk
less about the problems they've encountered and how
249
00:18:49.250 --> 00:18:52.930
you fix them. You need to
talk about looking forward, the problems they're
250
00:18:52.970 --> 00:18:56.799
going to encounter, the ways they're
going to deal with situations, the ways
251
00:18:56.839 --> 00:19:00.640
that they can innovate and take advantage
of new opportunities that are coming in the
252
00:19:00.720 --> 00:19:04.440
future. And just that little nugget. You talking about CEOS and sea level
253
00:19:04.480 --> 00:19:08.960
executives downloading the same sort of content
about a week before. That is more
254
00:19:10.309 --> 00:19:14.950
forward looking. That is, you
know, future looking more so than folks,
255
00:19:15.150 --> 00:19:18.349
you know, lower on the Totem
Pole, I guess you could sebolutely
256
00:19:18.789 --> 00:19:22.670
within organization. So that that was
really interesting. Yeah, there's going to
257
00:19:22.710 --> 00:19:26.180
be another follow up post published,
I believe, before the end of this
258
00:19:26.299 --> 00:19:30.819
week, that's going to be talking
about the continuance of those trends, but
259
00:19:30.019 --> 00:19:34.900
by a job area perspective. And
what's, I suppose, troubling right now
260
00:19:34.980 --> 00:19:41.210
is that we're seeing a massive spike
of legal professionals, lawyers, consuming content
261
00:19:41.250 --> 00:19:47.690
and so historically across the platform I've
not seen that type of behavior. So
262
00:19:47.809 --> 00:19:52.609
that's saying a lot of things right. People are either getting worried about legal
263
00:19:52.650 --> 00:19:57.640
implications to their business perhaps trying to
firm things up as to how things proceed.
264
00:19:59.160 --> 00:20:04.359
The second largest biking job area is
obviously pretty transparent, which is hr
265
00:20:04.720 --> 00:20:10.309
and that's unfortunate as well. And
so because we know behind the scenes unemployments.
266
00:20:10.349 --> 00:20:15.109
What fifteen percent plus in the states. So yeah, we're seeing,
267
00:20:17.109 --> 00:20:21.349
I think, some interesting positive things
happening, but we're also seeing real time
268
00:20:21.460 --> 00:20:25.859
negativity through content consumption. But it's
just our position to try to share this
269
00:20:26.019 --> 00:20:29.579
with everybody. Yeah, it's been
interesting. The other thing that I can
270
00:20:29.660 --> 00:20:32.859
share in this is by far not
based on as much data as you guys
271
00:20:32.900 --> 00:20:37.609
have collected, but we noticed,
you know, in we were James Are
272
00:20:37.809 --> 00:20:41.690
CEO and I were contributing to some
research just this week on BB podcasting.
273
00:20:41.769 --> 00:20:48.130
We got the question how has the
pandemic affected podcast listenership, because, you
274
00:20:48.210 --> 00:20:52.680
know, commute times have been one
of the staples of growing or audio content
275
00:20:52.799 --> 00:20:59.440
consumption and we saw a pretty significant
dip in March and April and in May,
276
00:20:59.519 --> 00:21:02.920
as we just finished looking at that, because we're recording very first part
277
00:21:02.920 --> 00:21:06.950
of June here, we were back
up and above and back to trending the
278
00:21:07.069 --> 00:21:08.910
way that we were. And I
just saw a recent news article. I
279
00:21:08.990 --> 00:21:11.910
can't remember who it was from,
but from what they saw, I can't
280
00:21:11.910 --> 00:21:18.269
necessarily cite the source, but podcasting
content saw across the across the board,
281
00:21:18.269 --> 00:21:22.299
a bit of a dip and then
back on to the same growth trajectory which
282
00:21:22.579 --> 00:21:26.660
to me kind of mirrored my own
content consumption because I went to fully remote
283
00:21:26.660 --> 00:21:30.740
work two years ago and I joined
the team here at sweetfish right and all
284
00:21:30.779 --> 00:21:33.849
of a sudden all of my drive
time as an outside sales person was gone.
285
00:21:34.210 --> 00:21:38.809
But over time that the audio consumption
kind of filled new spaces for me
286
00:21:38.930 --> 00:21:41.769
when I was walking the dog or
doing the dishes, those sorts of things.
287
00:21:41.809 --> 00:21:47.599
So curiously here, if you guys
have noticed anything in your recent data
288
00:21:47.640 --> 00:21:51.200
analysis, David on, we saw
US content channels. Yeah, we saw
289
00:21:51.240 --> 00:21:57.599
a slight dip and most of our
content tends to be highly produced editorial laden
290
00:21:57.720 --> 00:22:02.750
content and then next video, and
so I would say we saw a slight
291
00:22:02.869 --> 00:22:07.910
dip in March across all content formats. Right now. There's a massive spike
292
00:22:07.150 --> 00:22:11.470
in consumption of Webinars, but everything
else is really come back to where was,
293
00:22:11.789 --> 00:22:17.019
which is very encouraging. I think
the only caution I would have with
294
00:22:17.619 --> 00:22:22.460
sales folks reaching out on marketing generated
leads would be again going back to context
295
00:22:22.500 --> 00:22:29.980
I've I do you feel like professionals
are proceeding with understanding technical or business hurdles,
296
00:22:30.089 --> 00:22:34.369
doing research to do so? But
everybody's mental framework right now is a
297
00:22:34.410 --> 00:22:38.130
little bit different. Right. Even
getting back to the podcasts and why I
298
00:22:38.329 --> 00:22:42.650
suspect you're seeing an increase again,
it's like people are looking to try to
299
00:22:44.089 --> 00:22:47.039
regain some normalcy, right, even
if it means they're not going to be
300
00:22:47.119 --> 00:22:49.759
in their car, and so,
like I'm a cyclist outside of this.
301
00:22:51.119 --> 00:22:56.160
I've just been consuming a ton of
cycling podcast lately just because it's just one
302
00:22:56.200 --> 00:22:59.549
less reason for me to pay attention
to the real world because it's not so
303
00:22:59.750 --> 00:23:03.910
good. So, you know,
I think everyone's going through that and whether
304
00:23:03.950 --> 00:23:08.829
that's immersing yourself into more real,
hardcore business content, entertainment content or so
305
00:23:10.109 --> 00:23:14.099
on, I think that's why we're
seeing spikes across the board. The webin
306
00:23:14.180 --> 00:23:18.859
our side is obvious, though,
and that all offline events are canceled,
307
00:23:18.140 --> 00:23:25.700
and so all of that budget effort
and important terms of Lee generating vehicles had
308
00:23:25.819 --> 00:23:27.930
to shift two digital yeah, yeah, the moment you said that I was
309
00:23:27.970 --> 00:23:30.730
like, well, there's an increase
in Webin or consumption, but there's also
310
00:23:30.769 --> 00:23:34.529
been a huge increase in Weben or
production at the at the same time.
311
00:23:34.650 --> 00:23:41.000
Absolutely there's more to consume there.
It's really interesting to have have you share
312
00:23:41.079 --> 00:23:45.799
that on your personal experience listening to
podcast because I think they're there, and
313
00:23:45.880 --> 00:23:48.680
we were talking about this probably a
month ago, that you know, people
314
00:23:48.720 --> 00:23:53.880
will get back to consuming probably some
more entertainment content and that sort of stuff
315
00:23:53.960 --> 00:23:59.029
to kind of break from news binging
and that sort of stuff. And also,
316
00:23:59.390 --> 00:24:03.109
you know, you talked about,
unfortunately, the unemployment rate. There
317
00:24:03.309 --> 00:24:06.509
are going to be a lot of
people who are either looking for new work
318
00:24:06.630 --> 00:24:10.299
and trying to skill up or people
who maybe are a little bit anxious about
319
00:24:10.339 --> 00:24:12.420
what is the future going to hold
for my organization. I better skill up
320
00:24:12.500 --> 00:24:17.259
now. So as much as you
can deliver that sort of content to the
321
00:24:17.339 --> 00:24:19.380
folks in the niche that you're trying
to serve, the better off. I
322
00:24:19.460 --> 00:24:23.019
think you're going to be so to
talk a little bit as we round out
323
00:24:23.019 --> 00:24:29.529
the conversation, David, on what
marketers can do moving forward with some lightshed
324
00:24:29.730 --> 00:24:33.490
on content consumption through the data you
guys are sharing. We talked one about
325
00:24:33.130 --> 00:24:37.759
timing, your follow up cadences,
your your follow up, both the context
326
00:24:37.920 --> 00:24:41.839
and and the timing. What are
some other things, if there are,
327
00:24:41.039 --> 00:24:45.319
you know a couple things you think
beb marketer should take away from this that
328
00:24:45.400 --> 00:24:49.200
they could take action on this week, this quarter moving forward? Yeah,
329
00:24:49.200 --> 00:24:55.269
I think realistically, the most important
thing that we've been coaching our clients with
330
00:24:55.630 --> 00:24:59.470
is just looking at your content with
new eyes as it relates to the world
331
00:24:59.509 --> 00:25:02.910
today. It's likely that you're not
going to have to do a rewrite or
332
00:25:03.069 --> 00:25:07.660
reproduce of any video content or a
podcast, but you are going to need
333
00:25:07.740 --> 00:25:14.180
to change the context of how you
initially present that piece, unless it's extremely
334
00:25:14.259 --> 00:25:18.099
down funnel oriented content, where it
is, by our decision, oriented,
335
00:25:18.220 --> 00:25:23.529
only that's different. Everything else from
midfunnel and above needs to some how embrace
336
00:25:25.529 --> 00:25:27.769
what's happening in the world without overtly
talking about it. We don't need to
337
00:25:27.890 --> 00:25:33.930
consider consistently have COVID and every headline
of every white paper or Ebook, which
338
00:25:33.930 --> 00:25:37.319
we do see a ton of,
but it's about getting people through this time
339
00:25:37.480 --> 00:25:41.680
and becoming a trusted resource for them. And so if that means, you
340
00:25:41.759 --> 00:25:45.519
know, creating a platform where you
can lend an ear, and maybe that's
341
00:25:47.119 --> 00:25:52.470
virtual zoom conferences with with your with
your prospects or any other form of interactive
342
00:25:52.470 --> 00:25:57.789
content that allows them to engage with
your brand, build trust but have some
343
00:25:57.990 --> 00:26:03.390
empathy woven into that, I think
that will go a long way. Right
344
00:26:03.470 --> 00:26:06.859
now, the idea that you can
take a white paper that you created last
345
00:26:06.900 --> 00:26:10.259
year and just throw it in the
marketplace, I think is somewhat to be
346
00:26:10.380 --> 00:26:14.539
debated, if not challenged. There
needs to be just some messaging or refresh
347
00:26:14.940 --> 00:26:18.259
but it doesn't need a complete rewrite. But yeah, I think that's that's
348
00:26:18.299 --> 00:26:22.410
huge. Yeah, the other thing
that I just want to round things out
349
00:26:22.410 --> 00:26:26.210
with, so we talked about follow
up timing. You mentioned not necessarily rewriting
350
00:26:26.250 --> 00:26:30.089
all of your content, but a
shift especially to your top of funnel and
351
00:26:30.170 --> 00:26:33.160
mid funnel content in the way that
that is delivered in a one way.
352
00:26:33.240 --> 00:26:37.400
We've done that cur at sweetfish is, you know, obviously our pillar content
353
00:26:37.599 --> 00:26:41.400
is the show, our daily be
to be marching show be to be growth
354
00:26:41.480 --> 00:26:45.480
where a podcast agency, so podcasts
are pillar content. Just makes sense.
355
00:26:45.799 --> 00:26:49.910
We've never been much in Webinars,
but we started doing a monthly zoom call
356
00:26:51.430 --> 00:26:53.710
on bb podcasting, q an a. So we call it a live QNA.
357
00:26:53.910 --> 00:26:56.430
It's essentially a Webinar, but you
know, we do we don't like
358
00:26:56.630 --> 00:27:00.309
the way historical webinars have been run. So that's the way we phrase it.
359
00:27:00.460 --> 00:27:04.740
But that's one of the ways that
we've shifted some one of our content
360
00:27:04.819 --> 00:27:08.819
formats and it's allowed us to get
some more real time engagement those sorts of
361
00:27:08.859 --> 00:27:14.660
things. We've also been doing a
monthly mastermind call internally with our customers.
362
00:27:14.740 --> 00:27:17.930
So same sort of thing but on
a smaller, more narrow format, and
363
00:27:18.049 --> 00:27:23.289
so we found that just by offering
some some different types and exploring some different
364
00:27:23.410 --> 00:27:27.690
delivery mechanisms, we've seen some refreshed
engagement. So I would encourage folks on
365
00:27:27.930 --> 00:27:32.920
that. And then the last thing
is just that that time of delivery tip.
366
00:27:33.119 --> 00:27:37.000
You mentioning Ten am local time Tuesday
mornings. For whatever reason. Try
367
00:27:37.079 --> 00:27:41.119
that out over the next week and
say sort of results, you know work.
368
00:27:41.400 --> 00:27:44.710
What's it's laughable when we talk about
this, though, because I knew
369
00:27:44.750 --> 00:27:48.789
when we publish this is like the
more we circulate nextternalize that we're going to
370
00:27:48.829 --> 00:27:52.509
break that stat unfortunately. Yeah,
because everyone's going to use it. To
371
00:27:52.589 --> 00:27:55.109
do it quick. Do it now, but don't do it for the next
372
00:27:55.109 --> 00:27:57.509
quarter because right will it will have
changed, just like you know, I'm
373
00:27:57.549 --> 00:28:03.900
sure you guys saw a spike in
content with Covid in the headline and then
374
00:28:03.019 --> 00:28:07.140
once that, you know, we
got that fatigue. Now I'm I saw
375
00:28:07.259 --> 00:28:11.059
something from I think sales loft that
covid and subject lines. This was like
376
00:28:11.259 --> 00:28:17.009
six weeks ago, was already starting
to decrease reply rights as opposed to increase
377
00:28:17.049 --> 00:28:18.690
it. So you've got to be
Asile, you've got to be moving quickly.
378
00:28:19.130 --> 00:28:22.250
But I think those three tips,
as well as the other context that
379
00:28:22.369 --> 00:28:26.410
you shared with the with the data
that you guys have unpacked, David,
380
00:28:26.809 --> 00:28:29.960
has been very helpful for listeners.
If they want to take next steps,
381
00:28:30.000 --> 00:28:33.240
they want to find the full report
or reach out to you or stay connected
382
00:28:33.279 --> 00:28:34.720
with you in the team at netline. What's the best way for them to
383
00:28:34.759 --> 00:28:37.480
do that? Yeah, it's so. For netline itself, just go to
384
00:28:37.559 --> 00:28:44.710
netlinecom, an Etli, anycom the
reports available right off the home page multiple
385
00:28:44.750 --> 00:28:47.269
places as well, so you can't
miss it. We're all over the place
386
00:28:47.349 --> 00:28:51.990
on social but most active on Linkedin
and twitter, and then me personally linkedin.
387
00:28:52.589 --> 00:28:55.430
That's probably the best place to hit
up. Beyond the report, there's
388
00:28:55.430 --> 00:29:00.019
also an interactive version of the report
called audience explorer that allows you to drop
389
00:29:00.140 --> 00:29:04.019
in your own distinct personas, and
so if you're a marketer, I don't
390
00:29:04.019 --> 00:29:10.009
know, targeting finance professionals in the
manufacturing vertical, you can actually visit that
391
00:29:10.410 --> 00:29:15.930
free. It's completely ungated and see
the content consumption behavior actively occurring on the
392
00:29:15.970 --> 00:29:19.490
platform over the past one hundred eighty
days and it's a cool way to have
393
00:29:19.609 --> 00:29:25.880
a more live feed version of the
static PDF report that we produce on an
394
00:29:25.880 --> 00:29:29.799
annualized basis. So definitely check that
out. You don't even become a lead
395
00:29:29.799 --> 00:29:32.319
for us because we don't know who
you are, you're not filling out anything,
396
00:29:32.519 --> 00:29:34.599
but our hopes are that you find
value in it and would like to
397
00:29:34.680 --> 00:29:37.750
get your content in front of some
of those users. Yeah, absolutely,
398
00:29:37.789 --> 00:29:41.390
I mean that sounds very timely right
now. I know I just wrote audience
399
00:29:41.470 --> 00:29:45.109
and explore down. Will Link to
that in the show notes as well as
400
00:29:45.150 --> 00:29:48.349
the full report. I appreciate you
know as much as you guys are all
401
00:29:48.390 --> 00:29:52.019
about the data still having a mixture
of dated and ungated content. It's one
402
00:29:52.019 --> 00:29:56.140
of those things that I get pretty
passionate about that. Hey, not everything
403
00:29:56.259 --> 00:30:00.059
is meant to be content. Consumption
lead straight to a lead into A to
404
00:30:00.180 --> 00:30:03.180
a sales call. So, anyway, gree just you guys are we could
405
00:30:03.180 --> 00:30:06.740
have a whole other with us.
Thirty, yes, Oh, yes,
406
00:30:06.940 --> 00:30:08.690
more than thirty for sure. But, David, this has been fantastic.
407
00:30:08.730 --> 00:30:11.450
Thank you so much for joining us
on the show. IDEA. Take care.
408
00:30:11.569 --> 00:30:18.410
Thanks. It's sweetish. We're on
a mission to create the most helpful
409
00:30:18.529 --> 00:30:22.880
content on the Internet for every job, function and industry on the planet.
410
00:30:22.319 --> 00:30:26.119
For the BEB marketing industry, this
show is how we're executing on that mission.
411
00:30:26.160 --> 00:30:30.400
If you know a marketing leader,
that would be an awesome guest for
412
00:30:30.519 --> 00:30:33.000
this podcast. Shoot me a text
message. Don't call me because I don't
413
00:30:33.039 --> 00:30:37.869
answer unknown numbers, but text me
at four hundred seven for and I know
414
00:30:37.309 --> 00:30:41.190
three, three, two eight.
Just shoot me their name, maybe a
415
00:30:41.230 --> 00:30:44.670
link to their linkedin profile, and
I'd love to check them out to see
416
00:30:44.710 --> 00:30:47.910
if we can get them on the
show. Thanks a lot. It's sweet
417
00:30:47.950 --> 00:30:52.019
fish. We're on a mission to
create the most helpful content on the Internet
418
00:30:52.140 --> 00:30:56.019
for every job function in industry on
the planet. For the BEB marketing industry,
419
00:30:56.180 --> 00:31:00.380
this show is how we're executing on
that mission. If you know a
420
00:31:00.500 --> 00:31:03.259
marketing leader, that would be an
awesome guest for this podcast. Shoot me
421
00:31:03.289 --> 00:31:07.410
a text message. Don't call me
because I don't answer unknown numbers, but
422
00:31:07.569 --> 00:31:11.529
text me at four hundred seven for
and I know three, three, two
423
00:31:11.569 --> 00:31:14.809
eight. Just shoot me their name, maybe a link to their linkedin profile,
424
00:31:15.009 --> 00:31:17.849
and I'd love to check them out
to see if we can get them
425
00:31:17.890 --> 00:31:18.319
on the show. Thanks a lot.