Every Friday we share one non-obvious insight from your favorite creators in our newsletter.
July 2, 2020

1289: 3 Lessons on Content Distribution (from the Consumption Data of 4M B2B Professionals) w/ David Fortino

The player is loading ...
B2B Growth

In this episode, we talk to David Fortino, SVP of Audience and Product at NetLine.

If you like this episode, you'll probably also love:

2020 State of B2B Content Consumption and Demand Report for Marketers

Audience Explorer


Are you getting every B2B Growth episode in your favorite podcast player?

If not, you can easily subscribe & search past episodes here.

You can also find us on Apple Podcasts or Spotify.

Transcript
WEBVTT 1 00:00:06.000 --> 00:00:09.310 Welcome back to be tob growth. I'm looking lyles with sweet fish media. 2 00:00:09.509 --> 00:00:13.230 I'm joined today by David Fourteen. Oh, he's the STP of audience and 3 00:00:13.349 --> 00:00:15.990 product over at netline. David, welcome to the show. How's it going 4 00:00:16.070 --> 00:00:18.309 today, sir? It's going great. Thanks so much for having me. 5 00:00:18.710 --> 00:00:23.300 Awesome. We are going to be unpacking some lessons learned from a report that 6 00:00:23.460 --> 00:00:26.500 you guys do. I believe you're on your fourth edition of this. Tell 7 00:00:26.500 --> 00:00:30.899 us a little bit about about the report. Really all around content consumption. 8 00:00:31.300 --> 00:00:35.700 Not Not a more applicable topic for B Tob Marketers today than this, but 9 00:00:35.810 --> 00:00:38.250 give us a little bit of context. How long you guys been doing this? 10 00:00:38.609 --> 00:00:41.890 Why it's so important that you guys have have been doing this on a 11 00:00:41.929 --> 00:00:45.329 regular basis over at netline? Sure, sure, do Ya. So this 12 00:00:45.409 --> 00:00:50.679 is our fourth edition. It's formally known, or actually known, as the 13 00:00:50.759 --> 00:00:55.359 two thousand and twenty state of B Tob content consumption and demand report. It's 14 00:00:55.759 --> 00:00:59.719 really started four years ago, based upon questions from our own clients, saying, 15 00:00:59.759 --> 00:01:03.719 okay, you're processing all of this data on an annualized basis, seeing 16 00:01:03.840 --> 00:01:10.069 the content consumption trends that were occurring and really the customers wanted to better understand 17 00:01:10.109 --> 00:01:12.310 what was happening, not only as it related to their content, but other 18 00:01:12.670 --> 00:01:18.859 other competing organizations as well. Simultaneously, as an executive team, we met 19 00:01:18.980 --> 00:01:23.019 and really tried to force ourselves to rethink about how we were going to market 20 00:01:23.140 --> 00:01:26.659 right and and so most organizations talk about their products and their services and sure 21 00:01:26.780 --> 00:01:30.739 there's a content marketing strategy around that. But for us, who's always about 22 00:01:30.780 --> 00:01:37.290 the processing and capture of First Party, fully permission data that we deliver at 23 00:01:37.329 --> 00:01:42.010 scale to our customers. And so why not make data really front and Center 24 00:01:42.090 --> 00:01:45.849 for us as a company and build that out as our core pillar for any 25 00:01:45.890 --> 00:01:51.000 marketing strategy, not just content marketing, and then allow that data to educate 26 00:01:51.159 --> 00:01:53.879 marketers across the BB landscape so that they could be better at what they do? 27 00:01:55.640 --> 00:01:57.879 The thought process there is pretty simple, right, is that if marketers 28 00:01:57.920 --> 00:02:02.069 become reliant on us as a way to become more insightful and educated about their 29 00:02:02.109 --> 00:02:06.709 executions and they're more likely to become a client of ours. And that obviously 30 00:02:06.750 --> 00:02:09.150 has proven itself out over time, or we wouldn't continue to do it. 31 00:02:09.389 --> 00:02:15.349 So I guess the one cool observation there is I've kind of come to the 32 00:02:15.389 --> 00:02:19.460 conclusion that, regardless of what type of company you work at, as a 33 00:02:19.539 --> 00:02:23.460 marketer, you should really be seeking internally, trying to find those nuggets and 34 00:02:23.539 --> 00:02:29.259 superstar things that make you guys special and find a way to externally articulate that. 35 00:02:29.460 --> 00:02:31.210 For us it's data, but for every type of company it could be 36 00:02:31.289 --> 00:02:35.610 something different. Yeah, I mean what I hear you saying is just thought 37 00:02:35.650 --> 00:02:38.849 leadership, one and one, you know, delivering and being helpful and trying 38 00:02:38.930 --> 00:02:42.650 to analyze the trends in the way that you can. It's a little bit 39 00:02:42.729 --> 00:02:45.759 Meta for you guys, because you're all about the data for the audience that 40 00:02:45.840 --> 00:02:50.199 you serve, whether that's be to be marketers or ctos or or HR leaders 41 00:02:50.240 --> 00:02:53.080 and talent leaders whatever. That absolutely I think our one riff, though, 42 00:02:53.120 --> 00:03:00.150 on thought leadership, is that we were in a crowded space and Martech in 43 00:03:00.270 --> 00:03:04.669 general's extremely crowded and there's a lot of pontification, and then there's also a 44 00:03:04.830 --> 00:03:08.509 ton of surveys of two hundred of your peers right and then it's a bunch 45 00:03:08.509 --> 00:03:12.979 of talking heads at the executive level all saying the same thing about what's going 46 00:03:13.020 --> 00:03:17.539 to happen next. Year and we made a cognizant decision to not do that. 47 00:03:19.020 --> 00:03:23.340 We didn't want us to be the thought leader. The data was right 48 00:03:23.460 --> 00:03:27.289 and I think it is a distinction there to say this is fact, this 49 00:03:27.449 --> 00:03:30.930 is an opinion, this is not some projected story that we believe will come 50 00:03:31.129 --> 00:03:37.289 true. This is based upon over five million leads and over Sixteen Peta bytes 51 00:03:37.330 --> 00:03:42.360 worth the content consumption behavior being analyzed. I saw that as we were connecting 52 00:03:42.520 --> 00:03:45.280 over email before this interview. PEDA bytes. I was like, when was 53 00:03:45.319 --> 00:03:50.159 the last time I read Peta Bytes? I can't remember. Let's talk about 54 00:03:50.199 --> 00:03:53.520 data a little bit. You you mentioned this significance of First Party data. 55 00:03:53.639 --> 00:03:58.550 Talk a little bit about first party versus third party in what you guys were 56 00:03:58.590 --> 00:04:01.189 seeing. Now, as we get into the methodology and then unpacking some of 57 00:04:01.229 --> 00:04:04.590 the findings here. Yeah, and I think there's so first party versus third 58 00:04:04.669 --> 00:04:10.740 party. I'll describe and then we'll go into some particular reasons of importance, 59 00:04:10.780 --> 00:04:14.699 especially now moving forward. And so first party, as it sounds like, 60 00:04:15.419 --> 00:04:21.420 is directly sourced by individual users directly participating with content and deciding to share their 61 00:04:21.500 --> 00:04:27.730 information with you. So examples of that could be a person on an inbound 62 00:04:27.769 --> 00:04:30.129 strategy, finding their way to your corporate website, filling out a form, 63 00:04:30.370 --> 00:04:35.009 downloading a white paper or so on. On an our capacity, we operate 64 00:04:35.050 --> 00:04:41.560 a content syndication platform that's completely focused on driving by or engagement with be tob 65 00:04:41.639 --> 00:04:46.920 buyers, and so all of that consumption is taking place as users are proactively 66 00:04:46.959 --> 00:04:51.120 being recommended content specific to their business or technical challenges, but providing their own 67 00:04:51.199 --> 00:04:56.949 information when they're at the being prompted to actually request and engage with that content. 68 00:04:57.750 --> 00:05:00.589 There's a ton of effort and energy and money being spent on the opposite 69 00:05:00.589 --> 00:05:04.029 side of the industry, which would be around third party data. You'll hear 70 00:05:04.069 --> 00:05:10.740 references to this around intend or signals, things like that. I wouldn't say 71 00:05:10.779 --> 00:05:14.939 it's not used. It's or not necessarily you need to be used. It's 72 00:05:14.980 --> 00:05:20.180 certainly valuable. That said, it comes down to the fundamental debts I hear 73 00:05:20.300 --> 00:05:26.170 and part of its philosophical which is, are you okay as a marketer, 74 00:05:26.649 --> 00:05:31.730 tapping into data sets where your customer has zero idea that they're participating? And 75 00:05:31.850 --> 00:05:36.920 it's a really a challenging philosophy for much of the web right much of display 76 00:05:36.959 --> 00:05:43.000 based advertising has been predicated on buying audiences when the audiences have no idea that 77 00:05:43.079 --> 00:05:46.519 they're being sold. Social Media has a classic case of that as well. 78 00:05:46.560 --> 00:05:49.189 We're just on the opposite side of the spectrum, right, users that have 79 00:05:49.430 --> 00:05:54.790 to make a choice. They are provided the ability to do so. It's 80 00:05:54.870 --> 00:05:59.269 their choice to provide their information and, as such, the intent associated to 81 00:05:59.430 --> 00:06:01.670 that type of user, who sees your brand, who sees that long form, 82 00:06:02.069 --> 00:06:08.819 who sees your content, decides to engage, is statistically exponentially greater than 83 00:06:08.860 --> 00:06:13.939 a user who's cookies been followed unknowingly for thirteen days and traveling, you know, 84 00:06:14.100 --> 00:06:17.139 watching their behavior as it hits various news websites. It's not to say 85 00:06:17.180 --> 00:06:21.209 that that's not interesting and doesn't give you a better picture of your users journey, 86 00:06:21.370 --> 00:06:28.850 but realistically I think you've got to separate that. Now, looking forward, 87 00:06:29.290 --> 00:06:32.680 there's a ton of pushback from the attack and also even the government industries 88 00:06:33.959 --> 00:06:39.639 on the lack of use of third party data, especially across domains, and 89 00:06:39.759 --> 00:06:45.560 then also the push towards the removal of cookies in general, and so all 90 00:06:45.759 --> 00:06:48.389 of those models are predicated on third party data sets, not first party, 91 00:06:48.550 --> 00:06:54.670 and so you're seeing a lot of media companies now digging back in to the 92 00:06:54.790 --> 00:06:59.350 age old model that won't die and starting to create new email newsletters. The 93 00:06:59.709 --> 00:07:02.819 whole idea. There's your caption, first party data. You're then building progressive 94 00:07:02.819 --> 00:07:06.459 profiles and so on and going from there. Yeah, it seems like most 95 00:07:06.500 --> 00:07:12.060 marketers I talked to the the size of their own email list is still, 96 00:07:12.420 --> 00:07:15.970 you know, a very important staff for them, because it is, it 97 00:07:15.370 --> 00:07:19.290 is somewhat that the keys to the castle. Let's talk a little bit about 98 00:07:19.370 --> 00:07:23.850 some that's talked about in the report that you guys called the consumption gap. 99 00:07:23.889 --> 00:07:27.370 UNPACK that force a little bit. They would, I should are so the 100 00:07:27.449 --> 00:07:32.360 consumption gap was a phrase that we coined on our first report and it was 101 00:07:32.480 --> 00:07:36.800 based upon an observation that we actually never knew. We tract, we found 102 00:07:36.839 --> 00:07:42.800 the data set just lurking and our engineering team delivered it to us and we 103 00:07:42.879 --> 00:07:46.829 didn't really know what to really decipher it as. And ultimately it's the time 104 00:07:47.029 --> 00:07:53.189 between when a user actually decides to request your content, so they're registering for 105 00:07:53.230 --> 00:07:58.779 a Webinar or downloading an ebook or a podcast or white paper, and the 106 00:07:58.899 --> 00:08:03.459 time that they ultimately get around to consuming it. And so what's mind blowing 107 00:08:03.579 --> 00:08:07.699 is that, regardless of the year that we've published the report, on average, 108 00:08:07.740 --> 00:08:11.819 it's taking well over twenty four hours for the actual professional to get around 109 00:08:11.139 --> 00:08:16.730 to engaging with that content that they instantaneously did have access to, right. 110 00:08:16.850 --> 00:08:20.730 So, they requested it, they have access to it immediately. Yeah, 111 00:08:20.850 --> 00:08:22.970 so you're not talking about the gap between the request for the Info in the 112 00:08:24.009 --> 00:08:28.319 delivery of the content. You're talking about the time from request to actual consumption, 113 00:08:28.600 --> 00:08:35.080 exactly exactly. And so what's interesting here is that you're looking at averages 114 00:08:35.120 --> 00:08:37.960 around twenty four hours. For VP's they're exactly at twenty four four. Senior 115 00:08:39.000 --> 00:08:41.950 directors, they tend to be the fastest and they'll consume content at around twenty 116 00:08:43.029 --> 00:08:46.669 hours after their initial point of request. Contractors are the absolute worst and that 117 00:08:46.750 --> 00:08:50.710 they take up to forty four to forty five hours. But what's, I 118 00:08:50.830 --> 00:08:56.019 think, most pertinent here for marketers to understand is how that fact layers over. 119 00:08:56.059 --> 00:09:01.259 There exist nurture paths and follow up procedures when it comes to actually interacting 120 00:09:01.299 --> 00:09:09.259 with their sales foaks and so calling someone instantaneously and saying hey, thanks so 121 00:09:09.299 --> 00:09:13.129 much for downloading the report. What you think about the data? That's not 122 00:09:13.289 --> 00:09:15.889 the right context. It's not to say that you can't make the call, 123 00:09:16.370 --> 00:09:20.610 but the context needs to change. The user has not engaged with your content, 124 00:09:20.730 --> 00:09:24.289 they've not read any of it or watched a minute of your video. 125 00:09:24.120 --> 00:09:28.120 So you need to still be appreciative if you want to create that first impression. 126 00:09:28.399 --> 00:09:31.759 Make sure that you're presented as a resource and that you'll follow up down 127 00:09:31.799 --> 00:09:35.799 the road. It's not it's just simply not as great starting point. And 128 00:09:35.919 --> 00:09:41.669 knowing this data onhand, we've had countless clients actually pivot their nurture paths to 129 00:09:41.710 --> 00:09:43.830 run on this lader a little bit more of a delay. Firsts what they 130 00:09:43.830 --> 00:09:48.629 had, their sales follow up procedures have changed and so on, and this 131 00:09:48.750 --> 00:09:50.629 is something we put in a practice on our side. The only time you'd 132 00:09:50.629 --> 00:09:54.899 override that is obvious, and not if a user explicitly said the requesting for 133 00:09:54.980 --> 00:09:58.100 you to contact them. They want a demo and yet disregard all of this 134 00:09:58.340 --> 00:10:01.220 and jump right to it. But yeah, that's it's a huge one. 135 00:10:01.259 --> 00:10:07.330 It's been eye opening because we didn't necessarily expect to see it be that long. 136 00:10:07.009 --> 00:10:13.370 It defies most understood thought processes related to that. Has that consumption gap 137 00:10:13.409 --> 00:10:15.730 over the last four years of you, as you guys, have done that 138 00:10:15.850 --> 00:10:18.330 report. Have you seen that Linkedin? Have you seen it shortened? Has 139 00:10:18.370 --> 00:10:24.000 it been the same as it's actually lengthened really? Okay, so it's taking 140 00:10:24.039 --> 00:10:30.799 eight percent longer this year than in past years. So, yeah, this 141 00:10:30.919 --> 00:10:33.879 gets into areas where we as a company try not to go, where we 142 00:10:33.000 --> 00:10:37.470 start hypothesizing about things without facts to prove them. You know, the fact 143 00:10:37.549 --> 00:10:43.470 is it's taking eight percent longer. The reality is perhaps the markets more flooded 144 00:10:43.470 --> 00:10:46.269 with content than ever and it's harder for people to keep up with said content. 145 00:10:48.309 --> 00:10:52.100 There's more distractions, companies are constantly being asked to do more with less. 146 00:10:52.139 --> 00:10:56.700 All of those things. I'm sure all of that adds up to you, 147 00:10:56.139 --> 00:11:01.100 some of that delay, but I can't quantify that with with confidence at 148 00:11:01.100 --> 00:11:05.289 least. So I would say just aunt about. Yeah, again, this 149 00:11:05.450 --> 00:11:09.450 is just anecdotal, but I know in in my own experience, often times 150 00:11:09.490 --> 00:11:15.330 I will request a piece of a piece of content and I will immediately save 151 00:11:15.490 --> 00:11:18.679 that in a bookmarking APP that I use called pocket. I can catalog it, 152 00:11:18.879 --> 00:11:22.840 I can put tags on it and it's there from when when I'm ready, 153 00:11:22.879 --> 00:11:28.039 because due exactly times when I when I find something, it's not necessarily 154 00:11:28.240 --> 00:11:30.799 that I was looking for it. It might be an email I was subscribed 155 00:11:30.840 --> 00:11:33.990 to or a piece of content that was promoted on social and it seems interesting 156 00:11:35.029 --> 00:11:37.990 and I don't want to lose it, but it doesn't mean I'm going right 157 00:11:37.190 --> 00:11:43.309 to write to consuming it. The other metric beyond you know, because I 158 00:11:43.389 --> 00:11:48.820 think we get caught up so much as marketers in okay, someone's downloaded a 159 00:11:48.820 --> 00:11:52.419 piece of content. That equals a lade right, and that's because we've been 160 00:11:52.820 --> 00:11:58.340 trained to to be measured on mql's and ask you and leads in general. 161 00:11:58.740 --> 00:12:03.690 That's where the lead measurement starts. However, you're pointing out there are several 162 00:12:03.970 --> 00:12:09.049 micro conversions along the way requesting the content, actually consuming the content. That 163 00:12:09.210 --> 00:12:13.169 gap there. Have you noticed in your research, David, how much of 164 00:12:13.330 --> 00:12:18.320 that, how much of that requested content actually goes unconsumed? You talk about 165 00:12:18.320 --> 00:12:22.519 the delay, but then the percentage that is consumed or unconsumed. Have you 166 00:12:22.559 --> 00:12:24.919 seen some trends around that as well? It's been pretty steady actually, and 167 00:12:26.000 --> 00:12:31.070 it's about eleven percent of content ultimately gets requested and not engaged with. And 168 00:12:31.350 --> 00:12:37.990 so I've not done enough of a deeper dive into whether there's commonalities on topics, 169 00:12:39.629 --> 00:12:46.220 on persona of an audience segment that perhaps bubbles out to a really unique 170 00:12:46.259 --> 00:12:50.019 observation in the market place. It's a good idea actually. But yeah, 171 00:12:50.019 --> 00:12:54.820 we typically see around eleven percent consistently on an annualized basis of users who just 172 00:12:54.980 --> 00:12:58.850 don't engage. That's that's actually pretty encouraging to me. I was exp absolutely 173 00:13:00.049 --> 00:13:01.570 it because I mean, if you flip that around, that means ninety Bo, 174 00:13:01.769 --> 00:13:05.649 almost ninety percent of that content is getting consumed, and to me that's 175 00:13:05.690 --> 00:13:09.970 pretty encouraging. I would have expected that number to be lower. As far 176 00:13:09.970 --> 00:13:13.159 as the actual content consumption, you know, I had down here that we 177 00:13:13.240 --> 00:13:18.840 wanted to talk about the question of time. Is that related to the time 178 00:13:18.960 --> 00:13:22.919 of the follow up here or something else within the report that you wanted to 179 00:13:22.960 --> 00:13:24.679 call out, David? Yeah, so, as it related to the consumption 180 00:13:24.879 --> 00:13:31.029 gap it, it turns out that each job area and also job level has 181 00:13:31.070 --> 00:13:35.950 a predisposed time when it's best to reach them for consuming content, and so 182 00:13:37.070 --> 00:13:39.909 this gets back to not only the gap but when they're actually engaging with content. 183 00:13:41.029 --> 00:13:46.419 The first place one that's stuck out was ceasweet professionals. Tuesday at ten 184 00:13:46.500 --> 00:13:52.059 am local time, regardless of the geographic region, is the best time to 185 00:13:52.179 --> 00:13:56.809 reach them with any type of BB content. Why that is I have no 186 00:13:56.929 --> 00:14:00.330 idea. It sounds to me. It seems like a weird time, right, 187 00:14:00.409 --> 00:14:03.330 you would think earlier in the morning, possibly at lunch, mid morning. 188 00:14:05.129 --> 00:14:07.929 I can't compute that. But again, the data is what it is, 189 00:14:09.090 --> 00:14:13.799 and so we've taken a stance where we are externalizing all of this data, 190 00:14:13.039 --> 00:14:18.600 arming marketers with the information and hopefully allowing them to execute better campaigns moving 191 00:14:18.679 --> 00:14:22.759 forward. And so if marketers are thinking about that, that is the the 192 00:14:24.389 --> 00:14:28.870 time when they're best consuming it or most apt to to request and actually take 193 00:14:28.950 --> 00:14:33.629 action on it. So most like APP, yeah, most APPs to engage 194 00:14:33.870 --> 00:14:37.940 and and actually engage with your content. So, whether you're using US, 195 00:14:39.059 --> 00:14:43.139 whether you're promoting to your own inhouse file, if you're running display campaigns, 196 00:14:43.179 --> 00:14:46.059 you could probably do some day parting around that as well. It might be 197 00:14:46.220 --> 00:14:50.139 some interesting tactics, even if it's an ABM campaign, knowing that these folks 198 00:14:50.179 --> 00:14:56.450 are at their desks. You're not wasting impressions because on an ABM display campaign 199 00:14:58.009 --> 00:15:01.490 you're likely to be hitting the account, but not necessarily the sea suite. 200 00:15:01.850 --> 00:15:05.769 So if you were stacking a day part around ten am local, you're more 201 00:15:05.970 --> 00:15:09.360 more than likely to hit them. Interesting. I love digging into data like 202 00:15:09.480 --> 00:15:11.600 this. I can, I can nerve down on it all day long. 203 00:15:11.639 --> 00:15:16.399 David, let's talk a little bit. You know, we've tried not to 204 00:15:16.600 --> 00:15:20.960 hammer the new normals so much all the time, coronavirus, the the covid 205 00:15:20.000 --> 00:15:24.309 nineteen pandemic. But we've got to think about what does all of this mean 206 00:15:24.909 --> 00:15:31.190 in a postcovid world as we look forward to you know whatever, then the 207 00:15:31.350 --> 00:15:35.470 coming months in and years contained it seems like two thousand and twenty. No 208 00:15:35.590 --> 00:15:37.659 one knows what the heck the next day is going on ring. But what 209 00:15:37.820 --> 00:15:41.500 are some of the things? Again, without getting into too much hypothesizing, 210 00:15:41.580 --> 00:15:46.419 but what? What is the data showing marketers that they can take action on, 211 00:15:46.539 --> 00:15:50.409 based on based on these finding staved? Yeah, so the one thing 212 00:15:50.490 --> 00:15:54.809 that we've done there is we've really tried to take a more interactive stance on 213 00:15:56.490 --> 00:16:00.730 the annualized reporting that we historically have created. This now the two thousand and 214 00:16:00.730 --> 00:16:04.159 twenty report, and that we typically would create a static report and then let 215 00:16:04.200 --> 00:16:07.840 a year go by and revisit all of the data and have another benchmark, 216 00:16:07.919 --> 00:16:12.120 and so that's all well and good, but I don't feel it's good enough 217 00:16:12.279 --> 00:16:17.080 now. And so we've been asked by a lot of our clients even and 218 00:16:17.279 --> 00:16:22.909 users trying to better understand consumption patterns as they're happening today throughout the world, 219 00:16:22.750 --> 00:16:26.389 topics that are being impacted, and so we ultimately have started diving into this 220 00:16:26.470 --> 00:16:33.820 and we've been trying to produce monthly summaries on the impact that covid had at 221 00:16:33.860 --> 00:16:37.779 a consumption level across job areas, industries, geographic re agents and so on, 222 00:16:37.940 --> 00:16:44.019 and so that's something we're committed to. Will continuously externalize that on our 223 00:16:44.059 --> 00:16:48.610 blog until we don't have to. And so at some point I think the 224 00:16:48.649 --> 00:16:51.610 data is just going to normalize and look as normal as it could be, 225 00:16:51.850 --> 00:16:55.529 an even if that normal is different than what it was, there's not going 226 00:16:55.570 --> 00:16:59.850 to be any more interesting nuggets and stories to pull out. If that's the 227 00:16:59.929 --> 00:17:04.480 case, then we'll probably stop that blog series. The first post we looked 228 00:17:04.519 --> 00:17:08.799 at it was crazy because there was starting to be a flood of covid related 229 00:17:08.839 --> 00:17:15.309 business content being pushed on the platform within what was it a week. We 230 00:17:15.430 --> 00:17:22.990 saw as sixty six hundred percent increase from the beginning of January to the following 231 00:17:22.109 --> 00:17:26.789 week of January and requesting of that content. What was more interesting, though, 232 00:17:27.109 --> 00:17:32.779 was how that content was being requested and by whom. And so the 233 00:17:32.940 --> 00:17:37.740 first thing that happened was sea sweet professionals within large organizations for downloading this content 234 00:17:37.859 --> 00:17:42.019 at least a week in advance of their peers inside the company. And so 235 00:17:42.299 --> 00:17:47.049 right off the bat we're starting to think of things differently than we've ever had 236 00:17:47.130 --> 00:17:52.130 as well, where we're able to see content trends happening live before they're actually 237 00:17:52.210 --> 00:17:56.849 being ruled out. So that was a great example of seeing senior leadership doing 238 00:17:56.970 --> 00:18:00.599 research about what possible impact this is going to have on their company and then 239 00:18:00.680 --> 00:18:04.480 ultimately their employees, about a week and a half to two weeks later, 240 00:18:04.680 --> 00:18:08.559 downloading the same types of content as they are learning about the things that are 241 00:18:08.559 --> 00:18:12.869 going to happen in their company. A lot of that content spiking was around 242 00:18:14.069 --> 00:18:22.309 remote employees, were remote management, management of I would say management, growth 243 00:18:22.470 --> 00:18:26.180 tactic, stress management and oddly, some anxiety content to yeah, I mean 244 00:18:26.380 --> 00:18:30.940 it makes total sense. The other thing I think, to pull out of 245 00:18:30.059 --> 00:18:36.859 that lesson, just kind of an anecdote, thinking about for marketers and for 246 00:18:37.059 --> 00:18:41.259 sellers in the sea suite, the CEO and others in the sea suite. 247 00:18:41.690 --> 00:18:45.809 I've heard before from folks like Gong and and others. When you're selling to 248 00:18:45.890 --> 00:18:49.170 the sea sweet you need to talk less about the problems they've encountered and how 249 00:18:49.250 --> 00:18:52.930 you fix them. You need to talk about looking forward, the problems they're 250 00:18:52.970 --> 00:18:56.799 going to encounter, the ways they're going to deal with situations, the ways 251 00:18:56.839 --> 00:19:00.640 that they can innovate and take advantage of new opportunities that are coming in the 252 00:19:00.720 --> 00:19:04.440 future. And just that little nugget. You talking about CEOS and sea level 253 00:19:04.480 --> 00:19:08.960 executives downloading the same sort of content about a week before. That is more 254 00:19:10.309 --> 00:19:14.950 forward looking. That is, you know, future looking more so than folks, 255 00:19:15.150 --> 00:19:18.349 you know, lower on the Totem Pole, I guess you could sebolutely 256 00:19:18.789 --> 00:19:22.670 within organization. So that that was really interesting. Yeah, there's going to 257 00:19:22.710 --> 00:19:26.180 be another follow up post published, I believe, before the end of this 258 00:19:26.299 --> 00:19:30.819 week, that's going to be talking about the continuance of those trends, but 259 00:19:30.019 --> 00:19:34.900 by a job area perspective. And what's, I suppose, troubling right now 260 00:19:34.980 --> 00:19:41.210 is that we're seeing a massive spike of legal professionals, lawyers, consuming content 261 00:19:41.250 --> 00:19:47.690 and so historically across the platform I've not seen that type of behavior. So 262 00:19:47.809 --> 00:19:52.609 that's saying a lot of things right. People are either getting worried about legal 263 00:19:52.650 --> 00:19:57.640 implications to their business perhaps trying to firm things up as to how things proceed. 264 00:19:59.160 --> 00:20:04.359 The second largest biking job area is obviously pretty transparent, which is hr 265 00:20:04.720 --> 00:20:10.309 and that's unfortunate as well. And so because we know behind the scenes unemployments. 266 00:20:10.349 --> 00:20:15.109 What fifteen percent plus in the states. So yeah, we're seeing, 267 00:20:17.109 --> 00:20:21.349 I think, some interesting positive things happening, but we're also seeing real time 268 00:20:21.460 --> 00:20:25.859 negativity through content consumption. But it's just our position to try to share this 269 00:20:26.019 --> 00:20:29.579 with everybody. Yeah, it's been interesting. The other thing that I can 270 00:20:29.660 --> 00:20:32.859 share in this is by far not based on as much data as you guys 271 00:20:32.900 --> 00:20:37.609 have collected, but we noticed, you know, in we were James Are 272 00:20:37.809 --> 00:20:41.690 CEO and I were contributing to some research just this week on BB podcasting. 273 00:20:41.769 --> 00:20:48.130 We got the question how has the pandemic affected podcast listenership, because, you 274 00:20:48.210 --> 00:20:52.680 know, commute times have been one of the staples of growing or audio content 275 00:20:52.799 --> 00:20:59.440 consumption and we saw a pretty significant dip in March and April and in May, 276 00:20:59.519 --> 00:21:02.920 as we just finished looking at that, because we're recording very first part 277 00:21:02.920 --> 00:21:06.950 of June here, we were back up and above and back to trending the 278 00:21:07.069 --> 00:21:08.910 way that we were. And I just saw a recent news article. I 279 00:21:08.990 --> 00:21:11.910 can't remember who it was from, but from what they saw, I can't 280 00:21:11.910 --> 00:21:18.269 necessarily cite the source, but podcasting content saw across the across the board, 281 00:21:18.269 --> 00:21:22.299 a bit of a dip and then back on to the same growth trajectory which 282 00:21:22.579 --> 00:21:26.660 to me kind of mirrored my own content consumption because I went to fully remote 283 00:21:26.660 --> 00:21:30.740 work two years ago and I joined the team here at sweetfish right and all 284 00:21:30.779 --> 00:21:33.849 of a sudden all of my drive time as an outside sales person was gone. 285 00:21:34.210 --> 00:21:38.809 But over time that the audio consumption kind of filled new spaces for me 286 00:21:38.930 --> 00:21:41.769 when I was walking the dog or doing the dishes, those sorts of things. 287 00:21:41.809 --> 00:21:47.599 So curiously here, if you guys have noticed anything in your recent data 288 00:21:47.640 --> 00:21:51.200 analysis, David on, we saw US content channels. Yeah, we saw 289 00:21:51.240 --> 00:21:57.599 a slight dip and most of our content tends to be highly produced editorial laden 290 00:21:57.720 --> 00:22:02.750 content and then next video, and so I would say we saw a slight 291 00:22:02.869 --> 00:22:07.910 dip in March across all content formats. Right now. There's a massive spike 292 00:22:07.150 --> 00:22:11.470 in consumption of Webinars, but everything else is really come back to where was, 293 00:22:11.789 --> 00:22:17.019 which is very encouraging. I think the only caution I would have with 294 00:22:17.619 --> 00:22:22.460 sales folks reaching out on marketing generated leads would be again going back to context 295 00:22:22.500 --> 00:22:29.980 I've I do you feel like professionals are proceeding with understanding technical or business hurdles, 296 00:22:30.089 --> 00:22:34.369 doing research to do so? But everybody's mental framework right now is a 297 00:22:34.410 --> 00:22:38.130 little bit different. Right. Even getting back to the podcasts and why I 298 00:22:38.329 --> 00:22:42.650 suspect you're seeing an increase again, it's like people are looking to try to 299 00:22:44.089 --> 00:22:47.039 regain some normalcy, right, even if it means they're not going to be 300 00:22:47.119 --> 00:22:49.759 in their car, and so, like I'm a cyclist outside of this. 301 00:22:51.119 --> 00:22:56.160 I've just been consuming a ton of cycling podcast lately just because it's just one 302 00:22:56.200 --> 00:22:59.549 less reason for me to pay attention to the real world because it's not so 303 00:22:59.750 --> 00:23:03.910 good. So, you know, I think everyone's going through that and whether 304 00:23:03.950 --> 00:23:08.829 that's immersing yourself into more real, hardcore business content, entertainment content or so 305 00:23:10.109 --> 00:23:14.099 on, I think that's why we're seeing spikes across the board. The webin 306 00:23:14.180 --> 00:23:18.859 our side is obvious, though, and that all offline events are canceled, 307 00:23:18.140 --> 00:23:25.700 and so all of that budget effort and important terms of Lee generating vehicles had 308 00:23:25.819 --> 00:23:27.930 to shift two digital yeah, yeah, the moment you said that I was 309 00:23:27.970 --> 00:23:30.730 like, well, there's an increase in Webin or consumption, but there's also 310 00:23:30.769 --> 00:23:34.529 been a huge increase in Weben or production at the at the same time. 311 00:23:34.650 --> 00:23:41.000 Absolutely there's more to consume there. It's really interesting to have have you share 312 00:23:41.079 --> 00:23:45.799 that on your personal experience listening to podcast because I think they're there, and 313 00:23:45.880 --> 00:23:48.680 we were talking about this probably a month ago, that you know, people 314 00:23:48.720 --> 00:23:53.880 will get back to consuming probably some more entertainment content and that sort of stuff 315 00:23:53.960 --> 00:23:59.029 to kind of break from news binging and that sort of stuff. And also, 316 00:23:59.390 --> 00:24:03.109 you know, you talked about, unfortunately, the unemployment rate. There 317 00:24:03.309 --> 00:24:06.509 are going to be a lot of people who are either looking for new work 318 00:24:06.630 --> 00:24:10.299 and trying to skill up or people who maybe are a little bit anxious about 319 00:24:10.339 --> 00:24:12.420 what is the future going to hold for my organization. I better skill up 320 00:24:12.500 --> 00:24:17.259 now. So as much as you can deliver that sort of content to the 321 00:24:17.339 --> 00:24:19.380 folks in the niche that you're trying to serve, the better off. I 322 00:24:19.460 --> 00:24:23.019 think you're going to be so to talk a little bit as we round out 323 00:24:23.019 --> 00:24:29.529 the conversation, David, on what marketers can do moving forward with some lightshed 324 00:24:29.730 --> 00:24:33.490 on content consumption through the data you guys are sharing. We talked one about 325 00:24:33.130 --> 00:24:37.759 timing, your follow up cadences, your your follow up, both the context 326 00:24:37.920 --> 00:24:41.839 and and the timing. What are some other things, if there are, 327 00:24:41.039 --> 00:24:45.319 you know a couple things you think beb marketer should take away from this that 328 00:24:45.400 --> 00:24:49.200 they could take action on this week, this quarter moving forward? Yeah, 329 00:24:49.200 --> 00:24:55.269 I think realistically, the most important thing that we've been coaching our clients with 330 00:24:55.630 --> 00:24:59.470 is just looking at your content with new eyes as it relates to the world 331 00:24:59.509 --> 00:25:02.910 today. It's likely that you're not going to have to do a rewrite or 332 00:25:03.069 --> 00:25:07.660 reproduce of any video content or a podcast, but you are going to need 333 00:25:07.740 --> 00:25:14.180 to change the context of how you initially present that piece, unless it's extremely 334 00:25:14.259 --> 00:25:18.099 down funnel oriented content, where it is, by our decision, oriented, 335 00:25:18.220 --> 00:25:23.529 only that's different. Everything else from midfunnel and above needs to some how embrace 336 00:25:25.529 --> 00:25:27.769 what's happening in the world without overtly talking about it. We don't need to 337 00:25:27.890 --> 00:25:33.930 consider consistently have COVID and every headline of every white paper or Ebook, which 338 00:25:33.930 --> 00:25:37.319 we do see a ton of, but it's about getting people through this time 339 00:25:37.480 --> 00:25:41.680 and becoming a trusted resource for them. And so if that means, you 340 00:25:41.759 --> 00:25:45.519 know, creating a platform where you can lend an ear, and maybe that's 341 00:25:47.119 --> 00:25:52.470 virtual zoom conferences with with your with your prospects or any other form of interactive 342 00:25:52.470 --> 00:25:57.789 content that allows them to engage with your brand, build trust but have some 343 00:25:57.990 --> 00:26:03.390 empathy woven into that, I think that will go a long way. Right 344 00:26:03.470 --> 00:26:06.859 now, the idea that you can take a white paper that you created last 345 00:26:06.900 --> 00:26:10.259 year and just throw it in the marketplace, I think is somewhat to be 346 00:26:10.380 --> 00:26:14.539 debated, if not challenged. There needs to be just some messaging or refresh 347 00:26:14.940 --> 00:26:18.259 but it doesn't need a complete rewrite. But yeah, I think that's that's 348 00:26:18.299 --> 00:26:22.410 huge. Yeah, the other thing that I just want to round things out 349 00:26:22.410 --> 00:26:26.210 with, so we talked about follow up timing. You mentioned not necessarily rewriting 350 00:26:26.250 --> 00:26:30.089 all of your content, but a shift especially to your top of funnel and 351 00:26:30.170 --> 00:26:33.160 mid funnel content in the way that that is delivered in a one way. 352 00:26:33.240 --> 00:26:37.400 We've done that cur at sweetfish is, you know, obviously our pillar content 353 00:26:37.599 --> 00:26:41.400 is the show, our daily be to be marching show be to be growth 354 00:26:41.480 --> 00:26:45.480 where a podcast agency, so podcasts are pillar content. Just makes sense. 355 00:26:45.799 --> 00:26:49.910 We've never been much in Webinars, but we started doing a monthly zoom call 356 00:26:51.430 --> 00:26:53.710 on bb podcasting, q an a. So we call it a live QNA. 357 00:26:53.910 --> 00:26:56.430 It's essentially a Webinar, but you know, we do we don't like 358 00:26:56.630 --> 00:27:00.309 the way historical webinars have been run. So that's the way we phrase it. 359 00:27:00.460 --> 00:27:04.740 But that's one of the ways that we've shifted some one of our content 360 00:27:04.819 --> 00:27:08.819 formats and it's allowed us to get some more real time engagement those sorts of 361 00:27:08.859 --> 00:27:14.660 things. We've also been doing a monthly mastermind call internally with our customers. 362 00:27:14.740 --> 00:27:17.930 So same sort of thing but on a smaller, more narrow format, and 363 00:27:18.049 --> 00:27:23.289 so we found that just by offering some some different types and exploring some different 364 00:27:23.410 --> 00:27:27.690 delivery mechanisms, we've seen some refreshed engagement. So I would encourage folks on 365 00:27:27.930 --> 00:27:32.920 that. And then the last thing is just that that time of delivery tip. 366 00:27:33.119 --> 00:27:37.000 You mentioning Ten am local time Tuesday mornings. For whatever reason. Try 367 00:27:37.079 --> 00:27:41.119 that out over the next week and say sort of results, you know work. 368 00:27:41.400 --> 00:27:44.710 What's it's laughable when we talk about this, though, because I knew 369 00:27:44.750 --> 00:27:48.789 when we publish this is like the more we circulate nextternalize that we're going to 370 00:27:48.829 --> 00:27:52.509 break that stat unfortunately. Yeah, because everyone's going to use it. To 371 00:27:52.589 --> 00:27:55.109 do it quick. Do it now, but don't do it for the next 372 00:27:55.109 --> 00:27:57.509 quarter because right will it will have changed, just like you know, I'm 373 00:27:57.549 --> 00:28:03.900 sure you guys saw a spike in content with Covid in the headline and then 374 00:28:03.019 --> 00:28:07.140 once that, you know, we got that fatigue. Now I'm I saw 375 00:28:07.259 --> 00:28:11.059 something from I think sales loft that covid and subject lines. This was like 376 00:28:11.259 --> 00:28:17.009 six weeks ago, was already starting to decrease reply rights as opposed to increase 377 00:28:17.049 --> 00:28:18.690 it. So you've got to be Asile, you've got to be moving quickly. 378 00:28:19.130 --> 00:28:22.250 But I think those three tips, as well as the other context that 379 00:28:22.369 --> 00:28:26.410 you shared with the with the data that you guys have unpacked, David, 380 00:28:26.809 --> 00:28:29.960 has been very helpful for listeners. If they want to take next steps, 381 00:28:30.000 --> 00:28:33.240 they want to find the full report or reach out to you or stay connected 382 00:28:33.279 --> 00:28:34.720 with you in the team at netline. What's the best way for them to 383 00:28:34.759 --> 00:28:37.480 do that? Yeah, it's so. For netline itself, just go to 384 00:28:37.559 --> 00:28:44.710 netlinecom, an Etli, anycom the reports available right off the home page multiple 385 00:28:44.750 --> 00:28:47.269 places as well, so you can't miss it. We're all over the place 386 00:28:47.349 --> 00:28:51.990 on social but most active on Linkedin and twitter, and then me personally linkedin. 387 00:28:52.589 --> 00:28:55.430 That's probably the best place to hit up. Beyond the report, there's 388 00:28:55.430 --> 00:29:00.019 also an interactive version of the report called audience explorer that allows you to drop 389 00:29:00.140 --> 00:29:04.019 in your own distinct personas, and so if you're a marketer, I don't 390 00:29:04.019 --> 00:29:10.009 know, targeting finance professionals in the manufacturing vertical, you can actually visit that 391 00:29:10.410 --> 00:29:15.930 free. It's completely ungated and see the content consumption behavior actively occurring on the 392 00:29:15.970 --> 00:29:19.490 platform over the past one hundred eighty days and it's a cool way to have 393 00:29:19.609 --> 00:29:25.880 a more live feed version of the static PDF report that we produce on an 394 00:29:25.880 --> 00:29:29.799 annualized basis. So definitely check that out. You don't even become a lead 395 00:29:29.799 --> 00:29:32.319 for us because we don't know who you are, you're not filling out anything, 396 00:29:32.519 --> 00:29:34.599 but our hopes are that you find value in it and would like to 397 00:29:34.680 --> 00:29:37.750 get your content in front of some of those users. Yeah, absolutely, 398 00:29:37.789 --> 00:29:41.390 I mean that sounds very timely right now. I know I just wrote audience 399 00:29:41.470 --> 00:29:45.109 and explore down. Will Link to that in the show notes as well as 400 00:29:45.150 --> 00:29:48.349 the full report. I appreciate you know as much as you guys are all 401 00:29:48.390 --> 00:29:52.019 about the data still having a mixture of dated and ungated content. It's one 402 00:29:52.019 --> 00:29:56.140 of those things that I get pretty passionate about that. Hey, not everything 403 00:29:56.259 --> 00:30:00.059 is meant to be content. Consumption lead straight to a lead into A to 404 00:30:00.180 --> 00:30:03.180 a sales call. So, anyway, gree just you guys are we could 405 00:30:03.180 --> 00:30:06.740 have a whole other with us. Thirty, yes, Oh, yes, 406 00:30:06.940 --> 00:30:08.690 more than thirty for sure. But, David, this has been fantastic. 407 00:30:08.730 --> 00:30:11.450 Thank you so much for joining us on the show. IDEA. Take care. 408 00:30:11.569 --> 00:30:18.410 Thanks. It's sweetish. We're on a mission to create the most helpful 409 00:30:18.529 --> 00:30:22.880 content on the Internet for every job, function and industry on the planet. 410 00:30:22.319 --> 00:30:26.119 For the BEB marketing industry, this show is how we're executing on that mission. 411 00:30:26.160 --> 00:30:30.400 If you know a marketing leader, that would be an awesome guest for 412 00:30:30.519 --> 00:30:33.000 this podcast. Shoot me a text message. Don't call me because I don't 413 00:30:33.039 --> 00:30:37.869 answer unknown numbers, but text me at four hundred seven for and I know 414 00:30:37.309 --> 00:30:41.190 three, three, two eight. Just shoot me their name, maybe a 415 00:30:41.230 --> 00:30:44.670 link to their linkedin profile, and I'd love to check them out to see 416 00:30:44.710 --> 00:30:47.910 if we can get them on the show. Thanks a lot. It's sweet 417 00:30:47.950 --> 00:30:52.019 fish. We're on a mission to create the most helpful content on the Internet 418 00:30:52.140 --> 00:30:56.019 for every job function in industry on the planet. For the BEB marketing industry, 419 00:30:56.180 --> 00:31:00.380 this show is how we're executing on that mission. If you know a 420 00:31:00.500 --> 00:31:03.259 marketing leader, that would be an awesome guest for this podcast. Shoot me 421 00:31:03.289 --> 00:31:07.410 a text message. Don't call me because I don't answer unknown numbers, but 422 00:31:07.569 --> 00:31:11.529 text me at four hundred seven for and I know three, three, two 423 00:31:11.569 --> 00:31:14.809 eight. Just shoot me their name, maybe a link to their linkedin profile, 424 00:31:15.009 --> 00:31:17.849 and I'd love to check them out to see if we can get them 425 00:31:17.890 --> 00:31:18.319 on the show. Thanks a lot.