Every Friday we share one non-obvious insight from your favorite creators in our newsletter.
Nov. 2, 2022

Kyle Lacy’s Disagreement on Category Creation | Echo Chamber

Welcome to The Echo Chamber where James, Dan, and Benji throw in their 2 cents on what B2B marketers are talking about on the internet. Today, Kyle Lacy takes issue with Category Creation, and says brands just need better stories, but is it really...

The player is loading ...
B2B Growth
Welcome to The Echo Chamber where James, Dan, and Benji throw in their 2 cents on what B2B marketers are talking about on the internet. Today, Kyle Lacy takes issue with Category Creation, and says brands just need better stories, but is it really that simple? 
Micro-Clips: 
(Timestamps / Titles)
Sponsors: 
If you’re hiring, you need Indeed.
Sign up and get a $75 credit to sponsor your first job for better visibility, more applications and quicker hiring times. Stay in control with payment billing options, no long term contracts, pay for only what you need and pause spending at any time.*
Claim Your Credit 
*Sponsored Job credit offers available only for new U.S. accounts posting a job that expires one year after account creation. Upon expiration of credits, users are charged based on their Sponsored Job budget. Terms, conditions, and quality standards apply.
Transcript
WEBVTT 1 00:00:08.199 --> 00:00:12.880 Conversations from the front lines of marketing. This is B two B growth. 2 00:00:15.880 --> 00:00:19.280 We're stepping back into the echo chamber here on B two B growth, where 3 00:00:19.519 --> 00:00:23.199 we throw in our two cents on what B two B marketers are talking about 4 00:00:23.280 --> 00:00:26.760 on the internet and today, James and Dan, I thought it would be 5 00:00:27.000 --> 00:00:31.800 worth talking about kind of. Kyle Lacy had this disagreement of sorts with the 6 00:00:31.879 --> 00:00:36.039 idea of category creation, so it was a post on LinkedIn. I'll just 7 00:00:36.159 --> 00:00:39.880 read what he wrote and then we can discuss in further detail. But he 8 00:00:39.920 --> 00:00:45.119 says, I've been trying to describe my disagreement with the idea of category creation, 9 00:00:45.200 --> 00:00:50.520 and I think I finally found it. Most people rely on category creation 10 00:00:50.880 --> 00:00:56.079 as a strategy because they have failed to tell a compelling story. A meaningful 11 00:00:56.159 --> 00:01:02.399 story scales better than any category, and hope a great story will help fuel 12 00:01:02.880 --> 00:01:08.840 an eventual category creation exercise. It shouldn't be the other way around. People 13 00:01:08.879 --> 00:01:15.079 really liked this. It's sitting somewhere around the two hundred like sixty five comments 14 00:01:15.319 --> 00:01:19.400 area, and I thought it was really compelling to just see how people chimed 15 00:01:19.439 --> 00:01:23.120 in and tried to either agree or disagree. Dan. When you hear this 16 00:01:23.280 --> 00:01:26.200 and you think of category creation. What are your initial thoughts here? It 17 00:01:26.239 --> 00:01:33.439 triggers me because I just hear people and talk about story in such a romantic 18 00:01:33.480 --> 00:01:36.439 way, like it all starts at the story. It's the essence of being, 19 00:01:37.239 --> 00:01:40.359 isn't the story? And you're just kind of like, what are you 20 00:01:40.400 --> 00:01:44.239 talking about? I know of like fifty companies that like you don't know their 21 00:01:44.239 --> 00:01:47.480 story, but they're freaking huge, Like before this call, we're talking about 22 00:01:47.480 --> 00:01:51.400 like Target, like Target Massive Store. Do you know Target story? I 23 00:01:51.480 --> 00:01:55.079 don't. I've actually read some stories, like I've read Sam Walton story. 24 00:01:55.079 --> 00:01:57.640 I haven't read Target story. I don't even know how it started. But 25 00:01:57.879 --> 00:02:00.920 Best Buy like like do you know the company's? Sorry, most people don't 26 00:02:00.959 --> 00:02:04.719 know Massive company story. And if you go over into um even in the 27 00:02:04.760 --> 00:02:08.400 sas space Mail Chimp, I don't know Male Chimp story. I just don't. 28 00:02:08.759 --> 00:02:14.080 Do you know Intuit story? I don't think I mean even the iconic 29 00:02:14.159 --> 00:02:16.280 brands like in B two B right now, Like I don't think I know 30 00:02:16.840 --> 00:02:22.400 Gong story. I don't think I know Outreach your sales lost story. Now 31 00:02:22.479 --> 00:02:24.319 this might be a dumb question, but is the story doesn't have to be 32 00:02:24.400 --> 00:02:27.800 the company story? Because when I think of it too, it can also 33 00:02:27.840 --> 00:02:30.919 be the customer story that they're selling, like how they're going to make your 34 00:02:30.960 --> 00:02:35.560 life easier. And when you're talking about consumer products like a target, maybe 35 00:02:35.719 --> 00:02:38.319 like like you're kind of buying things that you need in a different way than 36 00:02:38.360 --> 00:02:43.080 like in the B two B space where you're selling like a solution that you're 37 00:02:43.080 --> 00:02:46.120 solving for. That's not the story though, that's the value proposition sure, 38 00:02:46.439 --> 00:02:51.400 right, or the positioning. I could think of salesforces story like I think 39 00:02:51.400 --> 00:02:54.360 a lot of us, like at least maybe maybe I've just been around sales 40 00:02:54.360 --> 00:02:58.520 for us long enough. But like Mark ben and Off like went off from 41 00:02:58.560 --> 00:03:00.800 Oracle because he knew he wanted to make a cloud based He's like, we're 42 00:03:00.840 --> 00:03:05.439 selling people these one off, one off purchases, but what if we just 43 00:03:05.479 --> 00:03:08.280 made it a reoccurring subscription and they could just forever have access to it and 44 00:03:08.280 --> 00:03:13.840 it just always updated right on the cloud, right, And they remember they 45 00:03:13.840 --> 00:03:16.560 started with the big no software thing, So I remember that story. Netflix 46 00:03:16.680 --> 00:03:22.159 also really strategic story. Do you guys know Netflix's story their official story because 47 00:03:22.199 --> 00:03:27.439 their unofficial their actual stories different, but their official story. Everyone's actual story 48 00:03:27.520 --> 00:03:30.680 is different. I was just watching a documentary of their story. I mean, 49 00:03:30.719 --> 00:03:35.479 there's it's fascinating how Read ended up looping it, you know, bringing 50 00:03:35.520 --> 00:03:38.960 in his former employee to co found it with him, and I mean, 51 00:03:39.120 --> 00:03:42.439 yeah, there's there's a lot of a lot of juice in that story. 52 00:03:42.599 --> 00:03:46.199 But you know what the official, like a few sentence story is. I 53 00:03:46.240 --> 00:03:50.080 mean, it's the one about him getting like all the late fees from Blockbusters. 54 00:03:52.159 --> 00:03:54.039 Yeah, no, it did happen. It did happen, but it's 55 00:03:54.039 --> 00:03:59.199 not the only thing that kicks off Netflix. So back and forth, I 56 00:03:59.240 --> 00:04:02.360 don't think it happens. I'm pretty sure they've they've talked about how that wasn't 57 00:04:02.360 --> 00:04:05.879 even actually the real thing, like that didn't actually happen. That was like 58 00:04:05.960 --> 00:04:09.840 maybe I heard that, I read I remember reading their found their book, 59 00:04:10.080 --> 00:04:13.800 and they're like, yeah, that was an element something that had happened, 60 00:04:13.800 --> 00:04:15.920 but like we were well into it way before that. It's kind of like, 61 00:04:16.560 --> 00:04:19.879 is it the thing that kicked it off? Not really, but we 62 00:04:20.399 --> 00:04:25.000 used there was a nice little sound bite of a chunk because it had happened 63 00:04:25.040 --> 00:04:27.800 to Read where he had a freaking huge late fee from not turning back his 64 00:04:27.879 --> 00:04:30.920 video back in you know, the part that I heard in the documentary that 65 00:04:30.959 --> 00:04:35.560 I recently watched was that I'm blanking on the other seat. Like the co 66 00:04:35.680 --> 00:04:39.920 founder that went on was like the first CEO of the company. I'm blanking 67 00:04:39.920 --> 00:04:44.120 on his name. His is the book that I read. But they essentially 68 00:04:44.120 --> 00:04:49.839 started it because the opportunity was massive, Like the video rental market was a 69 00:04:50.000 --> 00:04:55.600 huge market, and they saw a problem and like people not wanting to wait 70 00:04:55.639 --> 00:05:00.560 in line to and to go out of their house. And they had revelation 71 00:05:00.600 --> 00:05:03.879 that the cost of shipping the DVDs was small because of how small the DVD 72 00:05:04.160 --> 00:05:06.839 was, and they're like, hey, there's something here, because shipping is 73 00:05:06.839 --> 00:05:10.399 gonna be so low on these things that we can freaking make it. We 74 00:05:10.399 --> 00:05:13.519 should be able to make a profit off this. That's not why we buy 75 00:05:13.639 --> 00:05:16.959 Netflix. I don't. I don't pay twelve or fourteen or whatever the prices 76 00:05:17.000 --> 00:05:23.519 because of their story. I buy it because their value probably is insane. 77 00:05:23.720 --> 00:05:27.959 I think that's sort of what Chris Walker was driving at in his comment on 78 00:05:28.000 --> 00:05:31.279 this post, because he was basically saying, like, the story matters, 79 00:05:31.319 --> 00:05:36.240 but category creation is about the business model, product strategy, company strategy, 80 00:05:36.279 --> 00:05:42.360 So culture, talent, demand creation strategy and the p O V in story. 81 00:05:42.680 --> 00:05:48.000 So it's like it's all these things working in tandem that make category creation 82 00:05:48.439 --> 00:05:51.959 work. But when you only highlight like, oh, we gotta tell a 83 00:05:53.000 --> 00:05:57.040 more compelling story, that's gonna then in his opinion, and I think I 84 00:05:57.079 --> 00:05:59.920 would tend to agree, but be looked at more as a marketing ploy. 85 00:06:00.600 --> 00:06:02.439 I think there are cases. I just think there's just so many ways to 86 00:06:02.439 --> 00:06:06.519 win. Sometimes you're value Like sometimes a big selling point is in this story. 87 00:06:06.920 --> 00:06:10.519 You see this a lot in the health and wellness space, Right, 88 00:06:11.079 --> 00:06:15.680 somebody has a massive breakthrough and finds an easier way to control and manage their 89 00:06:15.680 --> 00:06:18.879 weight. Right, and it's controversial they think of that the liver king, 90 00:06:19.279 --> 00:06:24.040 right. Or like my friend was just staying over at our house and she 91 00:06:24.160 --> 00:06:27.360 was talking to me about this new wheat. They found this wheat in like 92 00:06:27.480 --> 00:06:30.560 this old tomb of some kind where they had a collection of these like this 93 00:06:30.680 --> 00:06:33.720 wheat jar, and they even found it in like the I don't know, 94 00:06:33.920 --> 00:06:36.160 like the mummy or I don't know if it was a mummy, but like 95 00:06:36.199 --> 00:06:39.959 it was this like ancient thing they found and then they found it a bunch 96 00:06:39.959 --> 00:06:43.759 of these preserved in a jar and I think they started growing it or something 97 00:06:43.959 --> 00:06:47.040 and then they're like, WHOA, this wheat supernutrient dense and it doesn't have 98 00:06:47.079 --> 00:06:51.160 all the stuff that causes people to be gluten intolerant, so people can actually 99 00:06:51.399 --> 00:06:55.000 people that are gluten and Tollert can now eat this bread. And so she 100 00:06:55.079 --> 00:06:57.319 bakes them while he were here, and it was good. It was also 101 00:06:57.480 --> 00:07:00.759 expensive, but she she told me this story about this like ancient wheat, 102 00:07:01.079 --> 00:07:04.639 and it was about the story that she led into this product with, and 103 00:07:04.680 --> 00:07:08.399 I just thought it was fascinating. My mind was triggering with like, Oh, 104 00:07:08.439 --> 00:07:12.040 this is where story matters in this case. She also made like ten 105 00:07:12.079 --> 00:07:15.519 other recommendations that weren't story based, but this one was so I was like, 106 00:07:15.560 --> 00:07:18.439 there's just so many ways to win. Story can be a differentiating factor. 107 00:07:19.079 --> 00:07:23.639 The trick is is it always how critical is it to category? Creation? 108 00:07:24.279 --> 00:07:33.120 B two B growth will be right back, m oh, this is 109 00:07:33.120 --> 00:07:38.439 where a story matters in this case. She also made like ten other recommendations 110 00:07:38.480 --> 00:07:40.920 that weren't story based, but this one was so. I was like, 111 00:07:40.959 --> 00:07:44.839 there's just so many ways to win. Story can be a differentiating factor. 112 00:07:45.480 --> 00:07:49.319 The trick is is it always how critical is it the category creation. Yeah, 113 00:07:50.199 --> 00:07:55.240 that's where I think the question is. And when we're talking about consumer 114 00:07:55.279 --> 00:08:01.600 products versus B two B there is a difference there as well. For when 115 00:08:01.639 --> 00:08:03.600 the story I would say, I don't want to say matters, because the 116 00:08:03.639 --> 00:08:07.279 story does matter, but like becomes the big thing, like in the story 117 00:08:07.319 --> 00:08:11.600 of the waiting, you know what I mean. Like it's it's slightly different 118 00:08:11.920 --> 00:08:13.800 in the B two B space. I thought there was a couple other like 119 00:08:13.879 --> 00:08:18.959 pretty compelling comments on this post in the back and forth I'll finish with like 120 00:08:20.000 --> 00:08:24.439 the Kyle and Chris Walker back and forth. So Kyle commented back, like 121 00:08:24.519 --> 00:08:28.040 he he agrees, which we've talked, we've laughed about this before. But 122 00:08:28.120 --> 00:08:31.240 it's the cordial like linked in back and forth, like fighting but not fighting 123 00:08:33.360 --> 00:08:39.159 though yeah, oh yeah, that story is not obviously a marketing ploy. 124 00:08:39.200 --> 00:08:43.759 And Chris just said the story brings everything together when done right for everyone else, 125 00:08:43.919 --> 00:08:48.080 it's truly a marketing ploy. That to me sums up so well, 126 00:08:48.120 --> 00:08:52.480 like don't if you only focus on the story, getting the story as shiny 127 00:08:52.480 --> 00:08:56.080 as you possibly can, but you had all these other pieces of product and 128 00:08:56.120 --> 00:09:01.159 stuff that's like doesn't align to that story. The story comes far less compelling 129 00:09:01.200 --> 00:09:05.159 because we would just all call bs on it. That to me is like 130 00:09:05.240 --> 00:09:09.320 the push and pull of getting your story locked in anything else. Here on 131 00:09:09.360 --> 00:09:13.639 this topic of category creation and and story there there was one comment here from 132 00:09:13.679 --> 00:09:18.600 Mike Greenberg. He says, companies are extensions of their founders and executive teams, 133 00:09:18.080 --> 00:09:22.639 and so we'll exhibit the same human and psychological issues that people struggle with. 134 00:09:22.759 --> 00:09:26.159 Category creation is often used as a solution to figuring out what you want 135 00:09:26.639 --> 00:09:31.039 and what you are, where in reality it needs to be the other way 136 00:09:31.080 --> 00:09:33.759 around. It's just like when people who don't know, who don't yet know 137 00:09:33.799 --> 00:09:37.320 what they want, make a really big life decision because they think it will 138 00:09:37.320 --> 00:09:43.000 help them figure it out. It's an external solution to an internal problem. 139 00:09:43.039 --> 00:09:46.519 I thought that was an interesting way to to look at it. We want 140 00:09:46.519 --> 00:09:50.080 to define what our category is so that we can know what we really want 141 00:09:50.080 --> 00:09:52.519 to be. And I think, I mean, you hear the lockheads of 142 00:09:52.519 --> 00:09:56.360 the world and uh, John Rougie's and the folks that really you know are 143 00:09:56.720 --> 00:10:03.120 prolifically talking about category recreation category design, and it's a process. And even 144 00:10:03.360 --> 00:10:07.240 Kyle I mean referred to it as you know, uh, an exercise like 145 00:10:07.399 --> 00:10:13.000 what do you say in in his you know, hopefully it leads to an 146 00:10:13.000 --> 00:10:16.720 eventual category creation exercise. So this stuff is a process. It takes time. 147 00:10:16.799 --> 00:10:20.720 I mean we're wrestling with it. We're talking about a lot more in 148 00:10:20.759 --> 00:10:24.679 the Journey series on GDP Growth, where Dan and I are talking about like 149 00:10:24.799 --> 00:10:28.600 us trying to figure out like what, you know, how that's the intersection 150 00:10:28.639 --> 00:10:31.279 between B two B growth story and sweet Fish story and like how does that 151 00:10:31.320 --> 00:10:35.879 play out with a media brand and the company's brand and and so yeah, 152 00:10:35.960 --> 00:10:39.120 I love seeing these debates. The overarching thing to me is just that, 153 00:10:39.240 --> 00:10:43.120 I mean, there are a lot of ways to win. And I think 154 00:10:43.120 --> 00:10:45.960 that's a recurring theme that we're gonna be talking about people growth a lot. 155 00:10:46.039 --> 00:10:48.759 But you pointed it out earlier, Dan, and I think it's spot on 156 00:10:48.840 --> 00:10:52.519 in this case. I did an episode on BDB Growth with a guy named 157 00:10:54.559 --> 00:10:58.039 klim All, and he had a fascinating take on this same subject that I 158 00:10:58.039 --> 00:11:03.120 think actually pulls the pieces together in a way that made sense to me and 159 00:11:03.240 --> 00:11:07.120 was really helpful for me when thinking about how does story connect to category And 160 00:11:07.159 --> 00:11:11.120 actually he had a third element of community in there um and his take when 161 00:11:11.120 --> 00:11:13.440 this the three became a flywheel. Like essentially, you have to figure out 162 00:11:13.440 --> 00:11:18.600 what's going on in the community in such a way that that story is actually 163 00:11:18.639 --> 00:11:20.679 going to resonate. Right, It all starts with who who are you talking 164 00:11:20.679 --> 00:11:24.799 to? And it's the story their story, Like you can make up a 165 00:11:24.840 --> 00:11:28.600 fantastical story, but like, is the story getna are they going to see 166 00:11:28.639 --> 00:11:31.039 themselves in that story? So it all starts with the community you're reaching, 167 00:11:31.320 --> 00:11:35.960 right, So the community informs the story or a k A strategic narrative, 168 00:11:37.159 --> 00:11:41.919 same thing, right, the strategic narrative framework is just storytelling right in a 169 00:11:41.960 --> 00:11:46.879 compelling way that becomes a category. Right. Sometimes the strategic narrative is the 170 00:11:46.919 --> 00:11:50.600 conclusion of it, as we need to start this new way of doing things 171 00:11:50.639 --> 00:11:54.000 because the old way of doing it's broken. Right. It's exactly what Chris 172 00:11:54.000 --> 00:11:58.240 Walker is doing. But his first round at it was just coming back into 173 00:11:58.320 --> 00:12:00.879 this is how demand gen is done. He didn't have to create a new 174 00:12:01.240 --> 00:12:05.320 category, just hijacked the existing category beautiful. It didn't have to become a 175 00:12:05.320 --> 00:12:09.519 new category. Sometimes it does and then the category eventually everyone grabs hold of 176 00:12:09.519 --> 00:12:13.919 that and it evolves and it still becomes back to the community. The community 177 00:12:13.000 --> 00:12:18.440 changes, and eventually the community starts to run into new issues, which turns 178 00:12:18.440 --> 00:12:20.360 back into a new narrative, which turns into a new category, and around 179 00:12:20.360 --> 00:12:24.600 and round it goes. Um Well, link to that in the show notes, 180 00:12:24.639 --> 00:12:26.879 because I think it was kind of a fascinating way of framework to think 181 00:12:26.919 --> 00:12:31.480 about how this all works together. But that's that was a framework that actually 182 00:12:31.519 --> 00:12:33.440 kind of pulled all the pieces together for me about a year and a half 183 00:12:33.480 --> 00:12:37.399 ago. I'm saying something if you saw it a year and a half ago 184 00:12:37.440 --> 00:12:39.399 and you're still talking about it today, images are always so helpful. So 185 00:12:39.399 --> 00:12:43.000 like I can imagine that flywheel in my head right now, and like, 186 00:12:43.080 --> 00:12:46.720 yeah, it definitely makes sense. When you focus on adding value to a 187 00:12:46.759 --> 00:12:52.360 community, you're going to discover new ways to do that over time, right 188 00:12:52.360 --> 00:12:56.840 because everyone's working to continuously get better, and then you're providing that new value 189 00:12:56.879 --> 00:13:00.279 and it just on and on it goes. And then if there's a new 190 00:13:00.279 --> 00:13:03.519 gap, right then it's like the aha moment. Oh now it's the time 191 00:13:03.559 --> 00:13:05.919 we create the category. But you've got to be in that community in order 192 00:13:05.919 --> 00:13:09.240 for it to make sense. I don't so in that way, I don't 193 00:13:09.240 --> 00:13:11.000 believe. I don't agree with Chris Walker that you actually have to build a 194 00:13:11.000 --> 00:13:15.440 business model around it. I think there are more elements than the story of 195 00:13:15.559 --> 00:13:18.200 creating a category, but you don't have to build a business around it. 196 00:13:18.240 --> 00:13:20.440 You can literally build the category, be the king of it and not have 197 00:13:20.519 --> 00:13:24.720 the business of it. Somebody else can come in and actually capitalize on it 198 00:13:24.759 --> 00:13:28.559 way better than you. Most people will be strategic enough to build a business 199 00:13:28.600 --> 00:13:31.000 around it. But I think you could be like a YouTuber and end up 200 00:13:31.039 --> 00:13:33.159 building a category just because you're educating in a way and starting a movement. 201 00:13:33.360 --> 00:13:37.399 But I think that's ultimately what you're trying to do is get a new get 202 00:13:37.399 --> 00:13:39.679 a new method or a way of thinking in there out into the world. 203 00:13:39.799 --> 00:13:43.480 But I don't necessarily think it requires building a business around it. Like you 204 00:13:43.519 --> 00:13:48.039 can just have a new framework and new way of doing it and make money 205 00:13:48.080 --> 00:13:52.919 on ads because you're a media your media machine, media company. Fascinating conversation. 206 00:13:52.960 --> 00:13:58.080 Well that's it for today's Echo Chamber episode. You can find all things 207 00:13:58.159 --> 00:14:01.080 be to be growth at B two B Growth showed dot com. Connect with 208 00:14:01.120 --> 00:14:03.799 each of us over on LinkedIn. We'd love to chat with you and thanks 209 00:14:03.799 --> 00:14:20.240 for listening everybody. Bye. B two B growth is brought to you by 210 00:14:20.279 --> 00:14:22.639 the team at sweet Fish Media. Here at sweet Fish, we produce podcasts 211 00:14:22.679 --> 00:14:26.759 for some of the most innovative brands in the world, and we help them 212 00:14:26.799 --> 00:14:31.440 turn those podcasts into micro videos, LinkedIn content, blog posts, and more. 213 00:14:31.559 --> 00:14:35.279 We're on a mission to produce every leader's favorite show. Want more information, 214 00:14:35.600 --> 00:14:43.639 visit sweet fish media dot com.